Red 3 (Erythrosine): Banned in Cosmetics But Still in Food

Red 3, known chemically as Erythrosine and designated E127 in Europe, represents one of the most glaring contradictions in American food safety regulation. In 1990, the FDA formally banned Red 3 from use in cosmetics and externally applied drugs after studies conclusively demonstrated that it causes thyroid cancer in laboratory animals. Yet despite this finding, the FDA has allowed Red 3 to remain legal in food and ingested drugs for over three decades. This means that while you cannot legally put Red 3 on your skin in a lipstick, you can eat it in candy, swallow it in a pill, and feed it to your children in cake frosting. This regulatory absurdity persisted until California took action in 2023, becoming the first state to ban Red 3 in food products.

Table of Contents

  1. Key Harms at a Glance
  2. Chemical Composition and Properties
  3. The FDA Contradiction: Banned on Skin, Allowed in Food
  4. Thyroid Disruption Mechanism
  5. Tumor Promotion
  6. California Food Safety Act of 2023
  7. Common Foods Containing Red 3 (Exposure Routes)
  8. EU Restrictions and International Status
  9. The Call for a Full FDA Ban
  10. Safety Thresholds & ADI
  11. How to Protect Yourself and Your Family
  12. Research Papers
  13. Connections
  14. Featured Videos

Key Harms at a Glance

Back to Table of Contents


Chemical Composition and Properties

The FDA Contradiction: Banned on Skin, Allowed in Food

The story of Red 3's partial ban is a case study in regulatory failure and industry influence over food safety policy.

The Evidence That Led to the Cosmetics Ban

In the 1980s, studies conducted as part of the National Toxicology Program demonstrated that high doses of Erythrosine caused thyroid follicular cell adenomas and carcinomas in male rats. The mechanism was identified: Erythrosine disrupts thyroid hormone regulation, leading to chronically elevated levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), which in turn promotes the growth of thyroid tumors. The evidence was considered conclusive enough that in January 1990, the FDA invoked the Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban Red 3 from cosmetics and externally applied drugs. The Delaney Clause, enacted in 1958, states that no additive shall be deemed safe if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals.

Why It Was Not Banned in Food

The obvious question is: if Red 3 causes cancer in animals and was banned from cosmetics under the Delaney Clause, why was it not simultaneously banned from food, where exposure is far greater because the substance is actually ingested? The answer lies in a combination of industry lobbying, bureaucratic inertia, and legal maneuvering.

The Result

The result is a regulatory situation that defies common sense: a substance that the FDA itself determined causes cancer in animals is banned from being applied to the outside of your body but is perfectly legal to put inside your body through food. This contradiction has persisted for over three decades and has become a symbol of the FDA's failure to adequately protect public health from harmful food additives.

Thyroid Disruption Mechanism

The thyroid-disrupting properties of Red 3 are well-documented and directly related to its molecular structure.

Tumor Promotion

California Food Safety Act of 2023

In October 2023, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the California Food Safety Act (AB 418), making California the first state in the nation to ban Red 3 from food products. The law also bans potassium bromate, brominated vegetable oil, and propylparaben.

Common Foods Containing Red 3

Despite declining use as some manufacturers have voluntarily switched to alternatives, Red 3 remains present in many popular food products.

EU Restrictions and International Status

The Call for a Full FDA Ban

Consumer advocacy organizations, independent scientists, and a growing number of legislators have called on the FDA to complete the ban it started in 1990 by removing Red 3 from food and ingested drugs.

Safety Thresholds & ADI

Back to Table of Contents

Protecting Yourself and Your Family

Back to Table of Contents


Research Papers

  1. National Toxicology Program. Carcinogenesis Studies of FD&C Red No. 3 (Erythrosine) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies). NTP TR 269.
  2. FDA. Color Additive Petitions — documentation of the 1990 cosmetics ban and 2025 food-use revocation of FD&C Red No. 3.
  3. PubMed topic search: erythrosine thyroid tumor rat
  4. PubMed topic search: erythrosine TSH pituitary
  5. PubMed topic search: FD&C Red No. 3 carcinogenicity
  6. PubMed topic search: erythrosine iodine thyroid hormone
  7. PubMed topic search: Delaney Clause food additive cancer
  8. PubMed topic search: food dye hyperactivity meta-analysis
  9. PubMed topic search: xanthene dye genotoxicity
  10. PubMed topic search: erythrosine neurobehavior children
  11. EFSA Panel on Food Additives. Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of Erythrosine (E 127) as a food additive. EFSA Journal. 2011;9(1):1854.
  12. California AB 418 (California Food Safety Act, 2023).

Back to Table of Contents


Connections

Back to Table of Contents


Video Thumbnail

FDA Bans Red Dye No. 3: What Families Need to Know!

Video Thumbnail

42: FDA Bans Red Dye No. 3: Understanding the Risks and What's Next

Video Thumbnail

Red Dye 3 Banned by FDA, what does it mean?

Video Thumbnail

Why Red No. 3 Is One of the Most Dangerous Food Dyes

Video Thumbnail

HMPV; Red Dye No.3; FDA Updates “Healthy” Food; Respiratory Viruses | S6E2

Video Thumbnail

Why You Should Never Consume Artificial Food Dyes (Coloring) | Healthy Living

Video Thumbnail

The uncomfortable secrets of the food industry

Video Thumbnail

Eating Red Dye No. 3 Everyday: Deep Dive

Video Thumbnail

WARNING: 5 Popular Children's Snacks that have PETROLEUM & Cause Childhood CANCER ✓