DASH Diet: The Blood-Pressure Diet That Actually Has Trials

Most "blood-pressure diets" are somebody's opinion. DASH is different: it was designed by researchers funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health specifically to lower blood pressure with food, and then it was put through the kind of tightly controlled clinical trials normally reserved for drugs — trials where every meal was cooked in a research kitchen and handed to the participants, so there was no guesswork about what anyone actually ate. It worked. In people with hypertension, the diet alone lowered systolic blood pressure by about 11 points in eight weeks — without salt restriction, without weight loss, and without a single pill. This article walks through what DASH is, what the trials really found (including the parts that get glossed over), what you actually eat, and how to start without turning your kitchen upside down.

Table of Contents

1. What DASH Is
2. The Original Trials, Honestly Reported
3. What You Actually Eat
4. Why It Works
5. DASH vs the Mediterranean Diet
6. Beyond Blood Pressure
7. A Week of Real Meals
8. Sodium, Honestly
9. Who Should Be Careful
10. Getting Started
11. Research Papers and References
12. Connections

What DASH Is

DASH stands for Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension. It is not a commercial diet — there is no book to buy, no membership, no branded products, and nobody profits when you follow it. It's an eating pattern designed in the early 1990s by a team of academic researchers with funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (part of the NIH), who asked a straightforward question: instead of testing single nutrients one at a time, what happens to blood pressure if you change the whole pattern of a person's food?

The pattern they built was deliberately ordinary: lots of vegetables and fruit, whole grains, fish, poultry, beans, nuts, and dairy, with less red meat, fewer sweets, and fewer sugary drinks than the typical American diet. Nothing exotic, nothing eliminated entirely, no fasting windows, no macros to track. What made it scientific was not the food — it was the testing. The DASH team ran controlled feeding studies: participants ate only food prepared by the study kitchens for weeks at a time, their weight was deliberately held steady, and even their salt intake was fixed. That design removes the two biggest excuses skeptics can raise about diet research ("they probably lost weight" and "they probably just ate less salt") and isolates the effect of the food pattern itself.

Because of that rigor, DASH sits in essentially every major hypertension guideline in the world as first-line lifestyle treatment. If your doctor has ever said "let's try diet and exercise before medication," DASH is, formally, the diet they mean.

The Original Trials, Honestly Reported

DASH (1997): the feeding study that started it

The original trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1997, enrolled 459 adults with blood pressure that was elevated but not severe. After three weeks on a control diet resembling typical American eating, they were randomly assigned for eight weeks to one of three diets: the control diet, a diet simply enriched with fruits and vegetables, or the full "combination" diet — fruits, vegetables, and dairy foods with reduced saturated fat, which became known as the DASH diet. Every meal was provided. Sodium and body weight were intentionally kept constant across all three groups.

The results, with no rounding games: the full DASH diet lowered blood pressure by 5.5/3.0 mmHg more than the control diet across everyone in the study. In the 133 participants who had hypertension, the effect was much larger — 11.4/5.5 mmHg below the control diet. The fruits-and-vegetables-only diet landed in between, lowering systolic pressure by 2.8 mmHg, which told researchers that produce does a lot of the work but the full pattern does more. The effect appeared quickly, within about two weeks, and then held steady.

To put 11.4/5.5 mmHg in perspective: that is in the same range as what a single first-line blood-pressure medication typically achieves. From food, in two months, with salt and weight deliberately held still.

DASH-Sodium (2001): adding salt reduction

The follow-up trial asked the obvious next question: what happens when you combine the DASH pattern with lower sodium? A total of 412 adults ate either the control diet or the DASH diet, and within their assigned diet spent 30 days at each of three sodium levels — roughly 3,500 mg a day (a typical American intake), roughly 2,300 mg, and a low level that worked out to about 1,500 mg a day.

Three honest findings came out of it. First, lowering sodium lowered blood pressure on both diets, and the effect grew as sodium dropped further. Second — and this is the combination everyone quotes — the DASH diet at the lowest sodium level, compared with the control diet at typical American sodium, lowered systolic blood pressure by 7.1 mmHg in people without hypertension and 11.5 mmHg in people with hypertension; averaged across all participants the combined effect was about 8.9/4.5 mmHg. Third, a nuance that rarely makes the headlines: sodium reduction mattered less on the DASH diet (about 3.0 mmHg going from high to low sodium) than on the control diet (about 6.7 mmHg). In other words, eating the DASH pattern partially protects you from the pressure-raising effect of salt — likely because of everything the diet adds, not just what it removes.

A 2017 reanalysis of the same trial, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, found that the benefit scales with how high your pressure is to begin with: in participants whose baseline systolic pressure was 150 mmHg or above, the combination of DASH plus low sodium lowered systolic pressure by a remarkable 20.8 mmHg versus the high-sodium control diet. The sicker your numbers, the more this way of eating gives back.

PREMIER (2003): the real-world check

Feeding studies prove what food can do; they don't prove people will do it in their own kitchens. The PREMIER trial tested exactly that: 810 adults with above-optimal blood pressure got either a single advice session, a full behavioral program (weight loss, exercise, sodium reduction, limited alcohol), or that same program plus DASH counseling — but everyone shopped and cooked for themselves. After six months, the behavioral program lowered systolic pressure a net 3.7 mmHg beyond advice alone, and adding DASH brought it to 4.3 mmHg — meaning the DASH component added only about 0.6 mmHg on top of the other lifestyle changes, a difference that was not statistically significant. More encouragingly, the share of participants who still had hypertension fell from 38% at baseline to 12% in the DASH group, versus 26% in the advice-only group.

The honest reading: DASH's full feeding-study effect is real, but self-directed adherence dilutes it. People in PREMIER only partially adopted the diet — their fruit, vegetable, and dairy intake rose, but nowhere near trial-kitchen levels. The diet works to the degree you actually eat it, which is exactly why the practical sections below matter more than the trial numbers.

What You Actually Eat

DASH is described in servings rather than rules. For a roughly 2,000-calorie day, the framework the trials and the NIH materials use looks like this:

• Vegetables — 4 to 5 servings a day. A serving is a cup of raw leafy greens or half a cup of anything cooked. Spinach, broccoli, carrots, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, beets — variety matters more than any single choice.
• Fruit — 4 to 5 servings a day. Whole fruit, not juice, does the job best: bananas, apples, oranges, berries, melon. Fruit is where much of the diet's potassium comes from.
• Whole grains — 6 to 8 servings a day. The trials emphasized whole grains: brown rice, oats, quinoa, barley, whole-wheat bread. A serving is modest — a slice of bread or half a cup of cooked rice — so this is less food than it sounds.
• Fish, poultry, and lean meats — up to about 6 ounces a day. Salmon, sardines, cod, chicken, and eggs all fit. Red meat isn't banned; it's occasional rather than daily.
• Nuts, seeds, and legumes — 4 to 5 servings a week. A handful of walnuts or almonds, or a half-cup of cooked lentils, chickpeas, or beans. Legumes pull triple duty: protein, fiber, and minerals.
• Dairy — 2 to 3 servings a day. Milk, yogurt, and cheese, in the portions the trials used. See the honest note on fat below.
• Fats and oils — 2 to 3 servings a day, and sweets — 5 or fewer a week. Sugary drinks are the main thing the pattern squeezes out, and they're the easiest thing to miss least.

The dairy-fat question, honestly

The original DASH trials used low-fat and non-fat dairy — that is a plain historical fact, and it reflected 1990s assumptions about saturated fat. But it was never tested against full-fat dairy in those trials; low-fat was simply built into the design. In 2016, researchers ran that missing comparison: a randomized crossover trial (often called the higher-fat DASH or HF-DASH study) in which 36 adults ate a standard DASH diet and a modified DASH diet with full-fat dairy, with sugar — mostly fruit juice — reduced to keep calories even. The result: the full-fat version lowered blood pressure just as much as classic DASH, and it also lowered triglycerides and large and medium VLDL particles, without significantly raising LDL cholesterol. It was a small, three-week-per-diet study, so it can't carry unlimited weight — but it is direct evidence that whole-milk yogurt or regular milk does not undo the diet.

This site's position, consistent with that trial: build DASH from whole foods, dairy included. Plain whole-milk yogurt and regular milk are real foods; fat-free processed dairy products with added sugars are not an upgrade. If you and your clinician are specifically chasing LDL reduction, the low-fat versions have the older trial evidence behind them — that's a legitimate reason some people choose them, not a moral one.

Why It Works

DASH wasn't reverse-engineered from a theory — it was assembled from foods rich in the nutrients that observational studies kept linking to lower blood pressure. Several mechanisms stack on top of each other:

• The mineral triad: potassium, magnesium, calcium. The trial menus delivered roughly 4,400–4,700 mg of potassium, around 500 mg of magnesium, and about 1,200 mg of calcium per day — each set near the 75th percentile of American intake, versus a control diet set near the 25th (only about 1,700 mg of potassium). Potassium is the heavyweight here: it helps the kidneys excrete sodium, relaxes the muscle in blood-vessel walls, and calms the sympathetic nervous system's grip on vessel tone.
• The sodium-to-potassium ratio. Many researchers now argue this ratio predicts blood pressure better than sodium alone. A typical American diet runs high-sodium/low-potassium; DASH flips both ends at once, which is part of why the food pattern outperformed what single-nutrient supplement studies had achieved.
• Fiber. The pattern provides roughly 30 grams a day from produce, beans, and whole grains like brown rice and oats — feeding gut bacteria whose short-chain fatty acid products are increasingly tied to vascular health and modestly lower blood pressure in their own right.
• Dietary nitrates. Leafy greens and beets supply nitrate that the body converts to nitric oxide, the molecule that tells arteries to dilate. Four-plus daily vegetable servings quietly add up to a meaningful nitrate dose.
• What's crowded out. Eight servings of produce and three of dairy leave little room for sugary drinks and ultra-processed snacks — the DASH menus cut added sugars sharply, which likely contributes through insulin and weight-independent vascular effects.

No single one of these explains the trial results; the honest summary is that DASH works because it moves half a dozen levers in the right direction simultaneously — which is exactly what single-nutrient pills fail to do.

DASH vs the Mediterranean Diet

These two patterns are cousins, not rivals. Both are built on vegetables, fruit, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and fish, with little processed food or added sugar. The differences are real but smaller than the marketing around either suggests: the Mediterranean diet is organized around olive oil as the dominant fat and is looser about structure; DASH is organized around produce, dairy, and explicit servings, says less about which oil to use, and is the only one of the two with a formal sodium arm in its evidence base.

Where each shines, judged by its evidence rather than its fame:

• DASH owns blood pressure. Its feeding-trial evidence for lowering blood pressure is the strongest that exists for any diet — controlled to a degree the Mediterranean trials never attempted. If your problem is hypertension specifically, DASH is the pattern designed and proven for it.
• The Mediterranean diet owns hard outcomes. The PREDIMED trial randomized about 7,400 high-risk adults and showed roughly 30% fewer heart attacks, strokes, and cardiovascular deaths over about five years. DASH has nothing equivalent: its outcome evidence — like the Nurses' Health Study analysis showing women who ate most DASH-like had 24% less coronary heart disease and 18% fewer strokes over 24 years — is observational, meaning it shows association, not proof of cause. That asymmetry is worth stating plainly, because DASH's blood-pressure effect makes better outcomes very plausible, but "plausible" and "demonstrated in a randomized trial" are different things.

In practice the two merge gracefully: cook DASH's servings framework in olive oil with fish a few times a week and you are eating something both research teams would endorse. Researchers have even formalized the hybrid (the MIND diet, aimed at brain health). Pick the frame that fits your life — structure-lovers tend to stick with DASH, intuitive cooks with Mediterranean — because the diet you continue eating is the one that works.

Beyond Blood Pressure

Blood pressure is DASH's headline act, but it has been studied against much more. Here's the evidence with its tier labeled — randomized trials are the strongest, cohort (observational) studies weaker, because healthy eaters differ from average eaters in many ways statistics can't fully untangle.

• Cholesterol — randomized trial evidence, with a caveat. In the original trial's lipid analysis, DASH lowered total cholesterol by 13.7 mg/dL and LDL by 10.7 mg/dL versus the control diet — but it also lowered HDL ("good") cholesterol by 3.7 mg/dL, and triglycerides didn't budge. The trial authors themselves flagged the HDL drop as needing further study. The 2016 full-fat-dairy variant discussed above improved the triglyceride/VLDL side of that picture, which is part of why rigid low-fat orthodoxy has softened.
• Overall cardiovascular risk — meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pooling 20 controlled trials with 1,917 participants, DASH lowered blood pressure by an average of 5.2/2.6 mmHg and modestly reduced total and LDL cholesterol; the authors estimated the combined changes would cut 10-year cardiovascular risk by about 13%. Estimated, not directly measured — but estimated from randomized data.
• Diabetes prevention — observational. Across 16 prospective cohorts, people eating most DASH-like developed type 2 diabetes 19% less often than those eating least DASH-like. Consistent and biologically sensible (fiber, less sugar, healthier weight), but not proven by a prevention trial. If blood sugar is your concern, see the blood sugar page for approaches with direct trial support.
• Gout — cohort evidence plus a randomized biomarker trial. In 26 years of follow-up of over 44,000 men, the most DASH-like eaters developed gout 32% less often, while Western-diet eaters had 42% more. Supporting mechanism: a randomized ancillary study of DASH-Sodium found the diet lowered serum uric acid by 0.35 mg/dL on average — and by about 1.3 mg/dL in the handful of participants who started with levels of 7 mg/dL or higher, which is the range where gout lives. (That same study found, unexpectedly, that higher sodium slightly lowered uric acid — a good reminder that biology rarely cooperates completely with any diet's story.)
• Kidney stones — observational, but striking. Across three large cohorts totaling over 240,000 people and 5,645 stone events, the most DASH-like eaters formed 40–45% fewer kidney stones — an effect that held even at lower calcium intakes and after excluding people with hypertension.
• Heart disease, stroke, and mortality — observational. The 24-year Nurses' Health Study numbers above (24% less coronary disease, 18% less stroke) came with lower levels of the inflammatory markers CRP and interleukin-6, which fits the mechanism story. Multiple cohorts point the same direction for overall mortality. Honest bottom line: strongly suggestive, never randomized.

A Week of Real Meals

The servings framework sounds bureaucratic until you see it on a plate. Here is a realistic week — nothing gourmet, nothing you can't buy at an ordinary grocery store.

• Breakfasts (rotate two or three): a bowl of oatmeal with a sliced banana and a spoonful of walnuts; whole-milk yogurt with berries; or scrambled eggs with sautéed spinach and whole-grain toast. Each one knocks out two to three servings before 8 a.m.
• Lunches: a big spinach salad with chickpeas, avocado, and olive-oil vinaigrette; lentil soup with a piece of fruit; leftover dinner over brown rice; a sardine-and-tomato plate on whole-grain bread.
• Dinners through the week: baked salmon, roasted sweet potatoes, and broccoli (Monday); chicken-and-vegetable stir-fry over brown rice (Tuesday); lentil-vegetable stew with a yogurt dollop (Wednesday); baked cod, quinoa, and a beet salad (Thursday); bean chili topped with avocado (Friday); a modest steak with a large salad and roasted vegetables (Saturday — red meat fits when it's occasional); roast chicken, barley, and green beans (Sunday).
• Snacks: fruit, a handful of unsalted nuts, carrot sticks, plain yogurt. This is where the 4–5 fruit servings quietly get finished.

Two practical notes from the trials: portions of grains and meat are smaller than restaurant culture has taught us, and the pattern only "works" arithmetically if vegetables or fruit show up at every meal — back-loading all your produce into dinner doesn't add up to five servings.

Sodium, Honestly

Sodium deserves its own section because it is both genuinely important and genuinely oversimplified — in both directions. The full picture, including why sodium is an essential nutrient and not a poison, lives on its own page; here is what the DASH evidence specifically supports.

What the trial showed: lowering sodium lowered blood pressure at every step, on both diets, with the biggest single effect coming from the drop below 2,300 mg toward 1,500 mg. But the response was not uniform — it was clearly larger in people with hypertension, and larger still at higher starting pressures. And the DASH pattern itself blunted salt's effect: high sodium simply hurt less when the rest of the diet was right, plausibly because the diet's potassium load helps the body excrete sodium.

Who is salt-sensitive? Blood pressure's response to sodium varies enormously between people. Sensitivity is more common in people who already have hypertension, in older adults, in African Americans, in people with kidney disease or diabetes, and it tends to increase with age. A young, lean, active person with 110/70 pressure and a whole-foods diet has little reason to obsess over sodium; a 62-year-old with 152/94 has a great deal.

The 1,500 vs 2,300 debate, stated fairly: the American Heart Association promotes an ideal of 1,500 mg largely on the strength of DASH-Sodium's dose-response; skeptics counter that 1,500 mg is very hard to sustain on self-prepared food, that trial evidence for hard outcomes (not just blood pressure) at such low intakes is thin, and that some observational studies suggest very low sodium intakes associate with worse outcomes — though those studies have measurement problems and reverse-causation concerns of their own (sick people eat less, and less salt). A defensible reading for most people with elevated pressure: getting from a typical 3,400 mg down to around 2,300 mg captures a large share of the benefit and is achievable; pushing to 1,500 mg adds more, mainly matters if you're salt-sensitive or hypertensive, and is worth discussing with your clinician rather than treating as a moral obligation.

The practical shortcut: roughly 70% of American sodium comes from packaged and restaurant food, not the salt shaker. Cook the meals in the section above from whole ingredients and your sodium falls near the 2,300 mg range almost automatically — salting your own cooking to taste included. That is the quiet genius of the pattern: it fixes the sodium-to-potassium ratio from both ends without asking you to eat bland food.

Who Should Be Careful

DASH is among the safest dietary patterns ever studied — it's essentially "eat normal whole foods in sensible proportions." But a few groups need to adapt it deliberately:

• Advanced chronic kidney disease. DASH's defining feature — a heavy potassium load — is exactly what damaged kidneys can struggle to excrete. In moderate-to-advanced CKD (especially stages 3b–5), high-potassium eating can raise the risk of hyperkalemia, a genuinely dangerous elevation of blood potassium. People with CKD should not adopt DASH on their own; a renal dietitian can build a modified version, and many people with early CKD do well on DASH with monitoring. The kidney-stone benefit above is for prevention in healthy kidneys, not a treatment for failing ones.
• Medications that raise potassium. ACE inhibitors (lisinopril, ramipril), ARBs (losartan, valsartan), spironolactone and other potassium-sparing diuretics, and some other drugs reduce potassium excretion. Most people on these medications tolerate a high-potassium diet fine — but the combination is the classic setup for hyperkalemia, especially with any kidney impairment. If you take these drugs, tell your clinician you're moving to a potassium-rich diet so they can check a blood level; do not add potassium supplements on top of the food.
• Blood-pressure and diabetes medications may need adjusting downward. This is a good problem: if DASH drops your pressure 8–11 points, your existing medication dose may become too strong, showing up as lightheadedness. Similarly, better eating can lower glucose enough to require adjusting insulin or sulfonylureas. Track your home numbers and let your prescriber steer.
• Warfarin users: DASH is rich in leafy greens and therefore vitamin K. The greens are not off-limits — the rule is consistency, so your INR can be dialed in around your steady intake. Tell your clinician before changing how you eat.
• Anyone with a condition needing a prescribed diet (heart failure fluid limits, dialysis, certain GI conditions) should fit DASH principles inside that prescription, not the other way around.

Getting Started

The PREMIER lesson is that partial adherence gets partial results — but partial results are still real, and the way people get to full adherence is by starting small enough that nothing feels like deprivation. In rough order of payoff per effort:

1. Add before you subtract. Week one, change nothing except adding a vegetable at two meals and swapping snacks for fruit. You'll displace the worst foods without ever "quitting" them.
2. Fix breakfast once. A default DASH breakfast (oatmeal-banana-walnuts, or yogurt-and-berries) that repeats most days removes daily decision-making and banks three servings automatically.
3. Make the grain swap. Wherever white rice or white bread currently appears, substitute brown rice, oats, or whole-grain bread. Same meals, same habits, more fiber, magnesium, and minerals.
4. Beans twice a week. A pot of lentil soup or a bean chili covers two dinners, costs almost nothing, and quietly hits the legume target.
5. Cook at home one more night than you currently do. This is the sodium intervention in disguise — no label-reading required.
6. Measure it. Buy a validated home blood-pressure cuff and log a morning reading a few times a week. The trials saw effects within two weeks; watching your own numbers respond is the most motivating feedback there is, and it produces exactly the record your clinician needs for medication decisions.

Expect the full pattern to take a month or two to become routine. Nobody eats DASH perfectly — the trial participants had it cooked for them — but the dose-response in every study says the same thing: closer counts.

Research Papers and References

1. Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, et al.; DASH Collaborative Research Group. (1997). A Clinical Trial of the Effects of Dietary Patterns on Blood Pressure. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(16):1117–1124. — The original DASH feeding trial: 459 adults, every meal provided, sodium and weight held constant. The combination diet lowered blood pressure 5.5/3.0 mmHg overall and 11.4/5.5 mmHg in participants with hypertension versus the control diet. (PMID: 9099655)
2. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al.; DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. (2001). Effects on Blood Pressure of Reduced Dietary Sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(1):3–10. — DASH plus low sodium versus a typical-American control diet lowered systolic pressure 7.1 mmHg in people without hypertension and 11.5 mmHg in those with it; sodium reduction helped on both diets but mattered less on DASH. (PMID: 11136953)
3. Appel LJ, Champagne CM, Harsha DW, et al.; Writing Group of the PREMIER Collaborative Research Group. (2003). Effects of Comprehensive Lifestyle Modification on Blood Pressure Control: Main Results of the PREMIER Clinical Trial. JAMA, 289(16):2083–2093. — The real-world test: with participants cooking for themselves, adding DASH counseling to a lifestyle program added only ~0.6 mmHg over the program alone, though hypertension prevalence fell from 38% to 12%. (PMID: 12709466)
4. Obarzanek E, Sacks FM, Vollmer WM, et al.; DASH Research Group. (2001). Effects on Blood Lipids of a Blood Pressure–Lowering Diet: The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 74(1):80–89. — DASH lowered total cholesterol 13.7 mg/dL and LDL 10.7 mg/dL, but also lowered HDL 3.7 mg/dL with no change in triglycerides — the honest lipid picture. (PMID: 11451721)
5. Chiu S, Bergeron N, Williams PT, Bray GA, Sutherland B, Krauss RM. (2016). Comparison of the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) Diet and a Higher-Fat DASH Diet on Blood Pressure and Lipids and Lipoproteins: A Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 103(2):341–347. — The full-fat-dairy DASH variant lowered blood pressure just as much as classic DASH and reduced triglycerides and VLDL without significantly raising LDL cholesterol. (PMID: 26718414)
6. Siervo M, Lara J, Chowdhury S, Ashor A, Oggioni C, Mathers JC. (2015). Effects of the Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. British Journal of Nutrition, 113(1):1–15. — Across 20 randomized trials (1,917 participants), DASH lowered blood pressure 5.2/2.6 mmHg and modestly reduced total and LDL cholesterol, predicting roughly 13% lower 10-year cardiovascular risk. (PMID: 25430608)
7. Juraschek SP, Miller ER 3rd, Weaver CM, Appel LJ. (2017). Effects of Sodium Reduction and the DASH Diet in Relation to Baseline Blood Pressure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70(23):2841–2848. — Reanalysis of DASH-Sodium: the combined diet's effect grew with baseline pressure, reaching −20.8 mmHg systolic in participants starting at 150 mmHg or above. (PMID: 29141784)
8. Fung TT, Chiuve SE, McCullough ML, Rexrode KM, Logroscino G, Hu FB. (2008). Adherence to a DASH-Style Diet and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke in Women. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(7):713–720. — Observational, 24 years of the Nurses' Health Study: the most DASH-like eaters had 24% less coronary heart disease and 18% less stroke, plus lower CRP and IL-6. (PMID: 18413553)
9. Rai SK, Fung TT, Lu N, Keller SF, Curhan GC, Choi HK. (2017). The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet, Western Diet, and Risk of Gout in Men: Prospective Cohort Study. BMJ, 357:j1794. — Over 26 years, men eating most DASH-like developed gout 32% less often (RR 0.68), while the Western pattern carried 42% higher risk. (PMID: 28487277)
10. Juraschek SP, Gelber AC, Choi HK, Appel LJ, Miller ER 3rd. (2016). Effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet and Sodium Intake on Serum Uric Acid. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 68(12):3002–3009. — Randomized evidence for the gout mechanism: DASH lowered serum uric acid by 0.35 mg/dL overall and by about 1.3 mg/dL in participants starting at 7 mg/dL or higher. (PMID: 27523583)
11. Taylor EN, Fung TT, Curhan GC. (2009). DASH-Style Diet Associates with Reduced Risk for Kidney Stones. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 20(10):2253–2259. — Across three cohorts and 5,645 stone events, the most DASH-like eaters formed 40–45% fewer kidney stones (RR 0.55–0.60), even at lower calcium intakes. (PMID: 19679672)
12. Jannasch F, Kröger J, Schulze MB. (2017). Dietary Patterns and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. Journal of Nutrition, 147(6):1174–1182. — Pooling 16 prospective cohorts, DASH adherence was associated with 19% lower incidence of type 2 diabetes (RR 0.81) — observational but consistent. (PMID: 28424256)

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

• All Remedies
• Hypertension
• Mediterranean Diet
• Potassium
• Sodium
• Magnesium
• Blood Sugar
• All Foods

Back to Table of Contents