HFpEF — Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction


Table of Contents

  1. What Is HFpEF?
  2. Who Gets HFpEF?
  3. How HFpEF Damages the Heart
  4. Diagnosis: HFA-PEFF Algorithm and Echo
  5. Diastolic Dysfunction Grading
  6. Symptoms: Exercise Intolerance and Dyspnea
  7. Treatment: Landmark Trials and Approved Therapies
  8. Lifestyle: Weight Loss, Exercise, and Salt Restriction
  9. Prognosis and Hospitalizations
  10. Research Papers
  11. Connections
  12. Featured Videos

What Is HFpEF?

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a form of heart failure in which the left ventricle pumps normally — the ejection fraction (EF) is 50% or higher — but the heart muscle is abnormally stiff and cannot relax properly between beats. Because the ventricle fills poorly, less blood enters before each contraction, so total cardiac output falls short of what the body needs, especially during physical activity.

HFpEF now accounts for roughly 50% of all heart failure cases in the United States and its share is rising as the population ages. Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), where the pump is visibly weak, HFpEF can be deceptively "normal-looking" on a standard echocardiogram, making it historically under-diagnosed and under-treated.

Back to Table of Contents

Who Gets HFpEF?

HFpEF has a distinctive patient profile that differs sharply from HFrEF:

Cardiologists often refer to HFpEF as a "syndrome" rather than a single disease because so many comorbidities converge to produce it.

Back to Table of Contents

How HFpEF Damages the Heart

In HFpEF the primary problem is diastolic dysfunction — impaired relaxation and reduced compliance of the left ventricle. Several interconnected mechanisms drive this:

Back to Table of Contents

Diagnosis: HFA-PEFF Algorithm and Echo

Diagnosing HFpEF requires proving that (1) symptoms of heart failure are present, (2) EF ≥50%, and (3) elevated filling pressures are the cause. The HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm, published by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, provides a structured five-step framework:

  1. Pre-test probability — calculate the H2FPEF or HFA-PEFF score from clinical variables (BMI, hypertension, AFib, age, filling pressure markers).
  2. Echocardiography at rest — measure E/e' ratio, LA volume index (LAVI), tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV), and left ventricular mass index.
  3. Biomarkers — NT-proBNP or BNP. Note that obesity lowers natriuretic peptides, so the threshold is adjusted downward for BMI >35.
  4. Exercise testing — a negative resting echo does not rule out HFpEF. Exercise echocardiography or right-heart catheterization during exertion can unmask elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP >15 mmHg at rest or >25 mmHg with exercise).
  5. Invasive hemodynamics — right-heart catheterization remains the gold standard when non-invasive tests are inconclusive.

Key echocardiographic findings in HFpEF include: E/e' >14, LAVI >34 mL/m², TRV >2.8 m/s, and LV mass index above sex-specific thresholds.

Back to Table of Contents

Diastolic Dysfunction Grading

The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) 2016 guidelines grade diastolic dysfunction in four stages:

Grades I–II represent a spectrum from normal aging to early HFpEF; Grades III–IV carry substantially worse prognosis and indicate advanced structural disease.

Back to Table of Contents

Symptoms: Exercise Intolerance and Dyspnea

The hallmark symptom of HFpEF is exertional dyspnea — breathlessness with activities that the patient previously tolerated easily. Unlike HFrEF, patients with HFpEF often feel reasonably well at rest, which can lead both patients and doctors to underestimate the severity of the condition.

Common symptoms include:

Because symptoms can mimic deconditioning, obesity hypoventilation, or lung disease, formal CPET with simultaneous echocardiography is increasingly used to confirm HFpEF as the cause of exertional symptoms.

Back to Table of Contents

Treatment: Landmark Trials and Approved Therapies

HFpEF was historically a "therapy desert" — every drug proven in HFrEF failed to show benefit in HFpEF trials. That changed with the SGLT2 inhibitor trials.

TOPCAT Trial — Spironolactone (Equivocal)

The TOPCAT trial (N=3,445, 2014) randomized HFpEF patients to spironolactone 15–45 mg/day vs placebo. The primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, heart failure hospitalization) was not significantly reduced (HR 0.89, p=0.14), though hospitalization for heart failure was lower in the spironolactone arm. Post-hoc analyses revealed major geographic heterogeneity — patients enrolled in Russia/Georgia had unexpectedly low event rates suggesting enrollment of non-HFpEF patients. The Americas subgroup showed a significant benefit. Spironolactone remains commonly used to reduce hospitalizations despite the neutral overall result.

EMPEROR-Preserved — Empagliflozin (First Approved Therapy)

The EMPEROR-Preserved trial (N=5,988, NEJM 2021) was the pivotal trial that changed HFpEF treatment. Empagliflozin 10 mg/day reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure by 21% (HR 0.79, p<0.001) in patients with EF ≥40%. The benefit was consistent across the full EF spectrum and was driven primarily by fewer heart failure hospitalizations. Empagliflozin became the first drug FDA-approved specifically for HFpEF in 2023, when the indication was broadened to heart failure regardless of EF.

DELIVER Trial — Dapagliflozin

The DELIVER trial (N=6,263, NEJM 2022) tested dapagliflozin 10 mg/day in HFpEF (EF ≥40%). It reduced the primary composite (worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death) by 18% (HR 0.82, p<0.001). A pooled meta-analysis of EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER confirmed SGLT2 inhibitors reduce heart failure hospitalizations, cardiovascular death, and total symptom burden in HFpEF with high consistency.

STEP-HFpEF Trial — Semaglutide

The STEP-HFpEF trial (N=529, NEJM 2023) tested semaglutide 2.4 mg/week (the weight-loss dose) in obese HFpEF patients (BMI ≥30). At 52 weeks, semaglutide produced a 13.3-point improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score vs 6.5 points for placebo (p<0.001), accompanied by 13.3% weight reduction and improved 6-minute walk distance. This was the first trial to show that treating obesity directly improves HFpEF symptoms, establishing weight loss as a therapeutic target — not merely a risk factor.

Other Therapies

Back to Table of Contents

Lifestyle: Weight Loss, Exercise, and Salt Restriction

Lifestyle modification is a cornerstone of HFpEF management because so many causal comorbidities respond to behavioral change:

Back to Table of Contents

Prognosis and Hospitalizations

HFpEF carries a 5-year mortality of approximately 50%, comparable to HFrEF and many common cancers, yet it remains under-recognized as a serious illness. Most deaths are from cardiovascular causes (sudden death, progressive heart failure, stroke), but non-cardiovascular deaths from comorbidities (cancer, renal failure, infection) are proportionally higher in HFpEF than in HFrEF.

Heart failure hospitalizations are both common and costly — patients with HFpEF have a 30-day readmission rate of 20–25%. Each hospitalization accelerates disease progression. Poor prognostic markers include: LAVI >40 mL/m², pulmonary arterial hypertension, right ventricular dysfunction, persistent NT-proBNP elevation above 1000 pg/mL, and low peak VO₂ (<14 mL/kg/min) on exercise testing.

Frailty, sarcopenia, and poor nutritional status independently worsen outcomes in the predominantly elderly HFpEF population, underscoring the need for multidisciplinary care that addresses skeletal muscle health alongside cardiac function.

Back to Table of Contents


Research Papers

The following citations are from published peer-reviewed literature on HFpEF diagnosis and treatment. PubMed links open the specific article or a targeted search.

Back to Table of Contents


Connections

Back to Table of Contents