Skin Cancer

Table of Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Epidemiology
  3. Pathophysiology
  4. Etiology and Risk Factors
  5. Clinical Presentation
  6. Diagnosis
  7. Treatment
  8. Complications
  9. Prognosis
  10. Prevention
  11. Recent Research and Advances
  12. Research Papers
  13. Connections
  14. Featured Videos

1. Overview

Skin cancer is by far the most common cancer in the United States — more people are diagnosed with skin cancer each year than all other cancers combined. An estimated 5 million Americans are treated for skin cancer every year, and roughly one in five Americans will develop it by age 70. The good news, and it is genuinely good news, is that the overwhelming majority of skin cancers are highly curable when found early. The skin is the one organ you can examine yourself, every day, without a single test — which makes skin cancer one of the few cancers where your own eyes can save your life.

There are three main types, and understanding the difference between them matters more than almost anything else on this page:

  1. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) — the most common cancer of any kind in humans, accounting for about 80% of skin cancers. It grows out of the basal cells at the bottom of the epidermis (the skin's outer layer). BCC grows slowly and almost never spreads to other organs — it is locally destructive rather than life-threatening. Left alone for years it can erode into surrounding tissue (older textbooks called it a "rodent ulcer"), but caught early it is removed in a single office visit.
  2. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) — the second most common type, arising from the flat squamous cells higher in the epidermis. SCC is usually curable, but unlike BCC it can spread (metastasize) in roughly 2–5% of cases, especially when it grows on the lip or ear, gets large, or develops in someone with a weakened immune system. Many SCCs announce themselves years in advance as actinic keratoses — rough, sandpapery pink patches on sun-exposed skin that are precancerous and easy to treat.
  3. Melanoma — the least common of the three but by far the most dangerous, because it metastasizes early relative to its size. Melanoma arises from melanocytes, the pigment-producing cells, and causes about 8,000 deaths per year in the US — the large majority of all skin-cancer deaths despite being only about 1% of skin-cancer cases. A melanoma the thickness of two dimes can already be life-threatening; one caught at the width of a pencil eraser but still thin is almost always cured.

The central theme of this article is a hopeful one: skin cancer is largely preventable (most cases trace back to ultraviolet light), largely detectable by you (the ABCDE rule and "ugly duckling" sign below take five minutes to learn), and — even at the advanced stage that was a death sentence fifteen years ago — increasingly treatable, thanks to immunotherapy drugs that have transformed metastatic melanoma from a disease with months of expected survival into one where roughly half of patients in major trials are alive at five years.


2. Epidemiology

Because most basal and squamous cell carcinomas are treated in dermatology offices and never reported to cancer registries, exact counts are estimates. The most-cited analysis, published in JAMA Dermatology in 2015, estimated 5.4 million keratinocyte carcinomas (BCC + SCC) treated in 3.3 million Americans in a single year — and incidence has continued to rise since. For melanoma, which registries do track, the American Cancer Society estimates roughly 100,000 new invasive melanomas and about 8,000 deaths per year in the US.

Key patterns worth knowing:


3. Pathophysiology

Skin cancer is, at its core, a disease of DNA damage from ultraviolet (UV) light accumulating faster than the skin can repair it. The mechanism is unusually well understood — UV damage leaves a literal molecular fingerprint in the tumor's DNA.

How UV light damages DNA

The gatekeeper genes

Why the immune system is central

Healthy immune surveillance constantly removes UV-mutated cells — this is why organ-transplant recipients on immunosuppressant drugs develop SCC at up to 65–100 times the normal rate. It is also why melanoma, packed with mutant proteins the immune system can recognize, responds so dramatically to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: the cancer survives by switching off attacking T-cells, and these drugs flip the switch back on.


4. Etiology and Risk Factors

UV exposure is the dominant cause, but risk is the product of exposure and susceptibility. The highest-risk profile is well defined:

And the exception that matters: acral melanoma — palms, soles, nail beds — occurs at roughly the same absolute rate across all skin tones and is not primarily a sun cancer. Its risk factors are less understood. The practical takeaway for readers with darker skin is not to worry about sunburn statistics but to include palms, soles, and nails in every self-exam, because these are precisely the melanomas found late.


5. Clinical Presentation

What each type looks like

The ABCDE rule for melanoma

  1. A — Asymmetry: one half doesn't match the other.
  2. B — Border: edges are ragged, notched, or blurred rather than smooth.
  3. C — Color: multiple shades in one spot — browns, blacks, or patches of red, white, or blue.
  4. D — Diameter: larger than about 6 mm (a pencil eraser) — though melanomas can be smaller.
  5. E — Evolving: changing in size, shape, color, or elevation, or newly itching or bleeding. E is the most important letter. A stable spot for twenty years is rarely the problem; the one that's different from last month is.

The "ugly duckling" sign

Most people's moles resemble each other — they share a family look. A melanoma usually doesn't match the family. Scan your skin and ask: does one spot stand out as darker, larger, or simply different from all its neighbors? That outlier — the ugly duckling — deserves attention even if it fails every ABCDE letter. This single heuristic catches melanomas that checklists miss.

How to do a monthly self-exam (5 minutes)

  1. After a shower, in good light, with a full-length mirror and a hand mirror.
  2. Front, back, left and right sides with arms raised. Use the hand mirror (or a partner, or a phone photo) for your back, scalp, and the backs of your legs.
  3. Forearms, underarms, and palms. Check between fingers and under fingernails and toenails — a new brown-black streak running the length of a nail, especially one widening or spilling pigment onto the surrounding skin, needs evaluation.
  4. Soles of the feet and between the toes.
  5. Photograph anything you're watching, next to a coin for scale. A photo from last month settles "is it changing?" better than memory ever will.

If you find something: don't panic, and don't wait. Most worrisome-looking spots turn out benign — but the visit is quick, and a biopsy is a minor office procedure. The cost of checking is trivial; the cost of waiting can be anything but.


6. Diagnosis

From spot to answer

  1. Clinical exam and dermoscopy. A dermatologist examines the lesion with a dermatoscope — a lit magnifier that reveals pigment networks and vessel patterns invisible to the naked eye. Dermoscopy substantially improves melanoma detection accuracy over the naked eye and spares many benign moles from biopsy.
  2. Biopsy. The only way to diagnose skin cancer is under the microscope. For suspected BCC/SCC, a quick shave or punch biopsy under local anesthetic suffices. For a suspected melanoma, guidelines prefer an excisional biopsy — removing the whole lesion with a narrow margin — because the pathologist must measure the tumor's full depth, and a partial sample can literally cut that measurement short.
  3. Pathology report. For melanoma, this report contains the single most important number in this entire disease.

Breslow depth — the number that drives everything

In 1970, surgeon Alexander Breslow showed that a melanoma's vertical thickness in millimeters — measured from the top of the skin's granular layer to the deepest cancer cell — predicts survival better than any other feature. Fifty-five years later, Breslow depth is still the backbone of melanoma staging:

If you or a family member is diagnosed with melanoma, ask two questions first: "What is the Breslow depth?" and "Is it ulcerated?" Those two answers frame everything that follows.

Staging beyond the skin

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) — injecting a tracer at the tumor site to find and remove the first ("sentinel") lymph node draining it — tells you whether melanoma has taken its first step outward. The landmark MSLT-I trial established SLNB as the standard staging tool for intermediate-thickness melanoma. For confirmed node-positive or thicker tumors, PET/CT or CT imaging and a blood LDH level complete staging under the AJCC (8th edition) system, which runs from stage 0 (in situ — confined to the epidermis, essentially 100% curable) to stage IV (distant spread). Molecular testing of advanced tumors for BRAF mutation is now routine because it determines drug options. BCC and SCC rarely need any of this — biopsy plus exam is usually the complete work-up.


7. Treatment

Basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma

Melanoma

  1. Wide local excision. The diagnosed melanoma site is re-excised with a safety margin scaled to Breslow depth (roughly 1 cm for thin tumors, 2 cm for thick ones). For thin melanomas this is the entire treatment.
  2. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for intermediate/thick tumors, as above. A positive sentinel node no longer automatically means removing all the nodes — trials showed careful ultrasound surveillance gives equal survival with far less lymphedema — but it does open the door to adjuvant drug therapy.
  3. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy — the revolution. Until 2011, metastatic melanoma had a median survival of well under a year and no drug proven to extend life. That year, ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) became the first, and the PD-1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab that followed were better still. These drugs don't poison the cancer; they release the brakes melanoma places on the patient's own T-cells. In the CheckMate 067 trial, the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab combination produced five-year overall survival of about 52% in stage IV melanoma — patients who would previously have been given months. Many long responders remain disease-free years after stopping treatment, a word oncologists once never used in stage IV melanoma: durable. These drugs now also serve as adjuvant therapy (after surgery for high-risk stage III disease) to cut recurrence risk.
  4. BRAF/MEK targeted therapy. For the ~half of melanomas carrying a BRAF V600 mutation, oral inhibitor pairs — dabrafenib + trametinib, vemurafenib + cobimetinib, encorafenib + binimetinib — switch off the jammed growth signal. Responses are fast and frequent (useful when disease is bulky or symptomatic), though resistance often develops over time, so these are typically sequenced with immunotherapy.
  5. What this means practically: if you are diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma, ask for BRAF testing, ask whether adjuvant immunotherapy applies to you, and strongly consider a consultation at an academic melanoma center — trial access and sequencing expertise measurably matter in this fast-moving field. Checkpoint inhibitors are expensive but FDA-approved and covered by Medicare and most insurers for approved indications; the manufacturers and many centers run patient-assistance programs worth asking about on day one.

8. Complications


9. Prognosis

Honest numbers, type by type:

Within melanoma, the strongest individual predictors remain Breslow depth, ulceration, and sentinel node status — plus age, site, and mitotic activity. Two melanomas of identical stage can behave differently, so treat survival statistics as the map, not the territory: they describe groups, not you.


10. Prevention

Sunscreen — what the evidence actually shows

Sunscreen skepticism is common, so it's worth being precise about the proof. The Nambour trial in Queensland, Australia randomized over 1,600 adults to daily SPF 16 sunscreen on the head and arms versus their usual discretionary use, for nearly five years. Results: ~40% fewer squamous cell carcinomas during the trial, and — in the prespecified 10-year follow-up published in the Journal of Clinical Oncologyhalf as many melanomas (and ~73% fewer invasive melanomas) in the daily-sunscreen group. This remains the only randomized trial of sunscreen and melanoma, and it was positive. Sunscreen is not a marketing story; it is one of the few cancer-prevention interventions ever proven in a randomized trial.

Practical use: broad-spectrum (UVA + UVB), SPF 30 or higher, applied generously (most people apply a quarter to half the tested dose — about a shot-glass full covers an adult in swimwear) and reapplied every two hours outdoors or after swimming/sweating. Mineral (zinc oxide / titanium dioxide) formulas suit sensitive skin and work immediately on application.

Sun-smart habits beyond sunscreen

The vitamin D question — handled honestly

Readers of this site know vitamin D matters, and the tension is real: the same UVB that burns skin also makes vitamin D in it. Three honest points resolve most of the conflict. First, in real-world use sunscreen has not been shown to cause vitamin D deficiency — application is imperfect, and incidental UVB gets through; trial participants using daily sunscreen (including in Nambour-associated studies) maintained vitamin D levels comparable to controls. Second, vitamin D synthesis plateaus quickly — brief incidental exposure (10–15 minutes on arms and legs a few times weekly for fair skin) generates substantial vitamin D, while the extended baking that follows adds mostly DNA damage, because the skin destroys excess pre-vitamin D as fast as it makes it. Third, for anyone at meaningful skin-cancer risk — and certainly anyone with a skin-cancer history — a vitamin D3 supplement is the rational way to get D: it delivers a measurable, titratable dose with zero mutations. Test your 25(OH)D level, supplement to sufficiency, and let your skin off the hook. There is no skin-cancer-safe tan, but there is absolutely a vitamin-D-sufficient life without one.

Nicotinamide for high-risk patients — a cheap, evidence-backed option

The Australian ONTRAC trial (New England Journal of Medicine, 2015) randomized 386 patients who had already had at least two keratinocyte cancers to nicotinamide 500 mg twice daily (a form of vitamin B3) or placebo for 12 months. Nicotinamide cut new BCCs and SCCs by 23% and reduced actinic keratoses, apparently by boosting DNA repair and preventing UV-induced immune suppression in skin. Important specifics: the benefit appeared only in this high-risk, prior-skin-cancer population and faded after stopping the pills; it is nicotinamide (niacinamide), not niacin — no flushing, inexpensive, over-the-counter; and it is no substitute for sun protection. If you've had multiple skin cancers, it's a conversation worth having with your dermatologist. Dietary antioxidants with photoprotective evidence — lycopene and astaxanthin among them — are reasonable adjuncts, never replacements, for the measures above.

Screening

Monthly self-exams (Section 5) plus a baseline full-body dermatologist exam — then annually for anyone with risk factors, prior skin cancer, many moles, or a melanoma family history. High-risk patients may get total-body photography or serial dermoscopy ("mole mapping") so change, the most important sign, becomes objectively measurable.


11. Recent Research and Advances


12. References & Research

Historical Background

Skin cancer holds a singular place in medical history: it was the first cancer ever traced to an environmental cause. In 1775, London surgeon Percivall Pott observed that chimney sweeps — boys sent up flues from childhood — developed scrotal squamous cell carcinoma ("soot wart") at extraordinary rates, and correctly blamed the soot itself, founding occupational medicine and the entire concept of chemical carcinogenesis a century and a half before the responsible polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were isolated. In the 1930s and 1940s, Wisconsin surgeon Frederic Mohs developed his microscopically controlled excision technique, which evolved into the fresh-tissue Mohs micrographic surgery that today offers the highest cure rates in skin oncology. In 1970, Alexander Breslow showed that simple tumor thickness predicts melanoma survival, giving the field its enduring prognostic backbone. The modern turning point came in 2011, when ipilimumab became the first drug ever to extend survival in metastatic melanoma and vemurafenib proved that targeting the BRAF mutation worked — twin breakthroughs, published a year apart in the New England Journal of Medicine, that converted melanoma from oncology's grimmest diagnosis into the proving ground for the immunotherapy revolution now reshaping treatment of many cancers.

Key Research Papers

  1. Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Feldman SR, Coldiron BM. Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (Keratinocyte Carcinomas) in the US Population, 2012. JAMA Dermatology. 2015;151(10):1081-1086.
  2. Breslow A. Thickness, Cross-Sectional Areas and Depth of Invasion in the Prognosis of Cutaneous Melanoma. Annals of Surgery. 1970;172(5):902-908.
  3. Abbasi NR, Shaw HM, Rigel DS, et al. Early Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: Revisiting the ABCD Criteria. JAMA. 2004;292(22):2771-2776.
  4. Boniol M, Autier P, Boyle P, Gandini S. Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;345:e4757.
  5. Green A, Williams G, Neale R, et al. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 1999;354(9180):723-729.
  6. Green AC, Williams GM, Logan V, Strutton GM. Reduced Melanoma After Regular Sunscreen Use: Randomized Trial Follow-Up. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2011;29(3):257-263.
  7. Chen AC, Martin AJ, Choy B, et al. A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(17):1618-1626.
  8. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final Trial Report of Sentinel-Node Biopsy versus Nodal Observation in Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370(7):599-609.
  9. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, et al. Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2017;67(6):472-492.
  10. Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(8):711-723.
  11. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;364(26):2507-2516.
  12. Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition versus BRAF Inhibition Alone in Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(20):1877-1888.
  13. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(26):2521-2532.
  14. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;381(16):1535-1546.

Research Papers

Live PubMed searches for the latest peer-reviewed literature on skin cancer — each link runs a current query against the National Library of Medicine database:

  1. Basal cell carcinoma treatment
  2. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma management
  3. Melanoma checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy
  4. Mohs micrographic surgery outcomes
  5. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma
  6. BRAF/MEK inhibitors in melanoma
  7. Nicotinamide skin cancer chemoprevention
  8. Sunscreen and melanoma prevention
  9. Acral lentiginous melanoma
  10. Actinic keratosis progression to SCC
  11. UV radiation, DNA damage, and skin carcinogenesis
  12. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma

Connections

Back to Table of Contents