Silicon Deficiency: What the Evidence Shows

Here is the honest bottom line, stated up front: there is no recognized silicon deficiency syndrome in humans. Silicon is the second most abundant element in the Earth's crust, it is present in essentially every diet, and no doctor diagnoses, no lab test screens for, and no medical textbook describes a disease caused by "low silicon" in people. That is very different from saying silicon does nothing. In chicks and rats raised on artificial silicon-free diets, a genuine deficiency stunts growth and disrupts bone and connective tissue — which is why silicon is sometimes called a "beneficial" or "possibly essential" trace element. And in people, several large population studies have found that those who eat more silicon tend to have somewhat denser bones, a real and interesting finding. But an association in a survey is not the same as a deficiency disease, and the human supplement trials so far are small and preliminary. This page lays out exactly what the evidence does and does not show, why a true shortfall is essentially never seen in everyday life, the rare and theoretical edge cases, and the low-key practical takeaway — which, for almost everyone, is simply to eat normally.


Table of Contents

  1. What the Evidence Actually Says
  2. The Biology: Why a Human Shortfall Isn't Seen
  3. The Bone and Connective-Tissue Research, Honestly
  4. Who, If Anyone, Could Run Low
  5. What to Do (Spoiler: Not Much)
  6. Related Nutrients and Minerals
  7. When to Talk to a Doctor
  8. Key Research Papers
  9. Connections
  10. Featured Videos

What the Evidence Actually Says

It is worth being precise about words. A deficiency, in the strict nutritional sense, means that going without a nutrient produces a recognizable disease that the nutrient then cures — the way too little vitamin C causes scurvy, or too little iodine causes goiter. By that standard, silicon has never met the bar in humans. No silicon-deficiency illness has ever been described in a person, no clinical guideline defines a "low silicon" threshold, and routine lab panels do not measure it. The U.S. Institute of Medicine has not set a Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for silicon precisely because the evidence is not strong enough to prove it is essential or to define how much a person needs.

So why does silicon come up at all in discussions of bone and connective-tissue health? Because the picture is genuinely more interesting than "irrelevant." The honest summary breaks into three tiers of evidence:

Putting it plainly: silicon looks beneficial and may even be conditionally important, but a clinically meaningful deficiency in free-living people has simply never been demonstrated. It is correct, and not a dodge, to say this is not a clinical problem you need to watch for.

Back to Table of Contents


The Biology: Why a Human Shortfall Isn't Seen

Two facts about silicon's chemistry and our diet explain why no one runs low in ordinary life.

First, silicon is everywhere. Silicon (chemical symbol Si) makes up roughly a quarter of the Earth's crust by weight — it is the main ingredient of sand, quartz, and most rock. Plants pull it out of the soil as they grow, so it ends up in the parts of plants we eat. The body absorbs it not as the rock-hard mineral but as a small, water-soluble molecule called orthosilicic acid (Si(OH)4), which dissolves readily in water and other beverages. Because plants concentrate it and water carries it, a normal mixed diet delivers silicon continuously without anyone trying. Typical Western intakes fall somewhere around 20–50 milligrams a day, with the richest contributors being whole grains and grain products (oats, barley, bran, brown rice), some fruits and vegetables (especially green beans and bananas), and — perhaps surprisingly — beer, in which barley husks leach highly absorbable silicon into the brew. Drinking water and some mineral waters add more.

Second, the body is forgiving about it. Orthosilicic acid is absorbed easily in the gut, circulates in the blood, and any excess is filtered out efficiently by the kidneys and passed in the urine. There is no large dedicated storage organ for silicon and no tight hormonal control system the way there is for calcium or potassium — intake in roughly equals excretion out, day to day. A balance study by Pruksa and colleagues confirmed exactly this in human volunteers: what people take in is closely matched by what they excrete. The practical consequence is that you cannot easily "deplete" yourself of silicon by eating a normal varied diet, because you are topping it up with every meal and drink.

Contrast this with a true essential nutrient that humans can run short of. Vitamin C is not made by the body and is destroyed by cooking, so a diet truly devoid of fresh produce causes scurvy within weeks. Iron is poorly absorbed and easily lost through bleeding, so deficiency is common worldwide. Silicon is the opposite story: abundant in food, well absorbed, freely excreted, and not depleted by everyday eating. That combination is why a deficiency state, easy to create artificially in a lab animal on a purified diet, essentially never arises in a person living a normal life.

Back to Table of Contents


The Bone and Connective-Tissue Research, Honestly

This is the area where silicon earns its reputation, so it deserves a careful, non-hyped walk-through. The interest is biologically reasonable: silicon shows up in the body wherever connective tissue is being built — in growing bone, in cartilage, in the walls of arteries, and in the "scaffolding" proteins like collagen that hold tissues together. The open question has always been whether that presence is doing real work, or is just a passenger.

What the laboratory shows. In a dish, orthosilicic acid nudges human bone-forming cells (osteoblasts) to make more type-1 collagen, the main protein framework that bone mineral later hardens onto. Reffitt and colleagues demonstrated this collagen-stimulating effect directly in human bone-like cells. A useful analogy: collagen is the rebar and concrete forms of a building, and calcium and phosphate are the concrete poured in. Silicon, in these experiments, seems to help lay down a better framework — which would matter for bone quality, not just bone density. This is a plausible mechanism, but cell-dish findings do not automatically translate to whole people.

What the population studies show. Several large observational studies have linked higher dietary silicon to higher bone mineral density. In the Framingham Offspring Cohort, Jugdaohsingh and colleagues found that people in the highest silicon-intake group had meaningfully greater hip bone density than those in the lowest — an association strongest in men and pre-menopausal women, and noticeably weaker in post-menopausal women. The Aberdeen Prospective Osteoporosis Screening Study (APOSS) by Macdonald and colleagues added an important nuance: silicon's apparent benefit seemed to depend on estrogen status, showing up mainly in women who had adequate estrogen (pre-menopausal, or post-menopausal women on hormone therapy). That estrogen interaction is a clue that silicon, if it helps, helps as part of a larger system rather than as a stand-alone fix.

Why associations are not proof. Here is the honesty this topic requires. People who eat more silicon are not a random group. They tend to eat more whole grains, more produce, and more beer — foods and drinks that travel with many other nutrients (magnesium, potassium, fiber, polyphenols) and with whole lifestyle patterns that independently affect bone. Statisticians call the silicon signal potentially confounded: the denser bones might be caused by the overall healthier dietary pattern, with silicon merely along for the ride as a marker of eating more plants. Observational studies can adjust for some of this, but they can never fully untangle it. That is exactly why a correlation, however consistent, cannot establish that silicon itself prevents bone loss.

What the human trials show — and don't. The cleanest test is a randomized trial: give some people silicon and others a placebo, then measure what happens. Very few exist. The most cited is Spector and colleagues' 2008 trial, in which osteopenic women received choline-stabilized orthosilicic acid (a well-absorbed supplement form) plus calcium and vitamin D, versus calcium and vitamin D alone. The silicon group showed favorable movement in a marker of bone formation and a hint of benefit at the femur, but the study was small and measured biochemical signals more than hard outcomes like fractures. No large trial has shown that silicon supplements prevent fractures or treat osteoporosis, and that is the outcome that would matter. The careful reviews in this field — Price's 2013 review and the Sripanyakorn group's overview of dietary silicon and bone — reach the same measured conclusion: silicon is a promising area for bone health that is biologically interesting and worth more research, but the human evidence is not yet strong enough to call it a treatment, let alone to define a deficiency.

So the fair verdict is a "maybe, partly, for bone quality, as part of a good diet" — not "low silicon causes weak bones." For the established, well-proven players in bone health, see Calcium, Magnesium, and the dedicated page on Bone Loss and Osteoporosis.

Back to Table of Contents


Who, If Anyone, Could Run Low

If a true silicon shortfall basically never happens in everyday life, the reasonable question is whether any situation could produce one. The honest answer is: only narrow, mostly theoretical cases — and even for these, there is no established disease and no recommendation to test or treat.

Notice what is not on this list: there is no genetic silicon-deficiency disorder, no malabsorption syndrome built around silicon, and no recognized clinical picture you could point a doctor to. That absence is itself the most important piece of evidence.

Back to Table of Contents


What to Do (Spoiler: Not Much)

Because there is no deficiency to correct, the practical advice here is refreshingly low-key. For the overwhelming majority of people, the right amount of effort to put into "getting enough silicon" is essentially none — a normal varied diet has it covered.

If you would like to favor silicon-rich foods anyway, the good news is that they are exactly the foods already recommended for general and bone health, so you lose nothing by leaning into them:

On supplements: silicon supplements exist — choline-stabilized orthosilicic acid (the form used in the research), plus older preparations like silica gel and horsetail-plant extracts. The honest position is that there is no proven reason for the general public to take them. The human evidence for benefit is preliminary, no deficiency is being corrected, and the foods that supply silicon are cheap, pleasant, and good for you for many other reasons. People sometimes try silicon supplements hoping for stronger hair, skin, and nails; the evidence there is similarly thin and is discussed on the Silicon for Hair and Nails page. If you are concerned about bone health, your time and money are far better spent on the proven essentials — adequate calcium, vitamin D, protein, weight-bearing exercise, and not smoking — than on silicon.

One caution worth flagging: horsetail, an herb marketed as a "natural silicon" source, contains an enzyme (thiaminase) that can break down vitamin B1 (thiamine), and products vary widely in quality and purity. That is another reason food, not herbal supplements, is the sensible way to get silicon.

Back to Table of Contents


Silicon does not act alone, and several of the minerals it is grouped with are far better established — which helps put silicon in perspective.

For the full picture of silicon's possible roles, see the Silicon overview and its benefits pages on bone density and connective tissue.

Back to Table of Contents


When to Talk to a Doctor

Because silicon deficiency is not a real clinical condition, there are no silicon-deficiency symptoms to watch for and no reason to ask for a silicon blood test — such testing is not part of standard care and would not guide any treatment. What follows are the situations where the underlying concern people bring to silicon — usually bones, joints, hair, skin, or nails — genuinely warrants a conversation with a clinician:

The unifying message: if something feels wrong with your bones, joints, or connective tissue, that is worth a doctor's attention — but the answer almost certainly lies with well-established nutrients and conditions, not with a silicon shortage.

Back to Table of Contents


Key Research Papers

  1. Carlisle EM (1972). Silicon: An Essential Element for the Chick. Science;178(4061):619-621. — DOI: 10.1126/science.178.4061.619
  2. Schwarz K, Milne DB (1972). Growth-promoting Effects of Silicon in Rats. Nature;239(5371):333-334. — DOI: 10.1038/239333a0
  3. Jugdaohsingh R, Tucker KL, Qiao N, Cupples LA, Kiel DP, Powell JJ (2004). Dietary Silicon Intake Is Positively Associated With Bone Mineral Density in Men and Premenopausal Women of the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research;19(2):297-307. — DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.0301225
  4. Macdonald HM, Hardcastle AC, Jugdaohsingh R, Fraser WD, Reid DM, Powell JJ (2012). Dietary silicon interacts with oestrogen to influence bone health: Evidence from the Aberdeen Prospective Osteoporosis Screening Study. Bone;50(3):681-687. — DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.11.020
  5. Spector TD, Calomme MR, Anderson SH, Clement G, Bevan L, et al. (2008). Choline-stabilized orthosilicic acid supplementation as an adjunct to Calcium/Vitamin D3 stimulates markers of bone formation in osteopenic females: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;9:85. — DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-85
  6. Reffitt DM, Ogston N, Jugdaohsingh R, Cheung HFJ, Evans BAJ, et al. (2003). Orthosilicic acid stimulates collagen type 1 synthesis and osteoblastic differentiation in human osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Bone;32(2):127-135. — DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00950-x
  7. Jugdaohsingh R, Anderson SHC, Tucker KL, Elliott H, Kiel DP, et al. (2002). Dietary silicon intake and absorption. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition;75(5):887-893. — DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/75.5.887
  8. Sripanyakorn S, Jugdaohsingh R, Elliott H, Walker C, Mehta P, et al. (2004). The silicon content of beer and its bioavailability in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Nutrition;91(3):403-409. — DOI: 10.1079/bjn20031082
  9. Sripanyakorn S, Jugdaohsingh R, Thompson RPH, Powell JJ (2005). Dietary silicon and bone health. Nutrition Bulletin;30(3):222-230. — DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2005.00507.x
  10. Pruksa S, Siripinyanond A, Powell JJ, Jugdaohsingh R (2014). Silicon balance in human volunteers; a pilot study to establish the variance in silicon excretion versus intake. Nutrition & Metabolism;11:4. — DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-11-4
  11. Price CT, Koval KJ, Langford JR (2013). Silicon: A Review of Its Potential Role in the Prevention and Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. International Journal of Endocrinology;2013:316783. — DOI: 10.1155/2013/316783

PubMed Topic Searches

Back to Table of Contents


Connections

Back to Table of Contents