Pandan in Traditional Medicine and for Pain

Pandan is unusual among widely used tropical plants in that its traditional-medicine record is thin, domestic and honest about itself. It is not a plant with a formal place in a codified system — not a classical Ayurvedic drug, not a Traditional Chinese Medicine materia medica staple, not a Malay or Thai herb with a canonical set of indications and preparations. It is a kitchen plant that occasionally does household duty.

That matters for how you read the claims. When a plant sits at the centre of a documented tradition — ginseng, turmeric, ginger — the ethnobotanical record is dense enough to be informative even before anyone runs a trial: many practitioners, many centuries, converging indications, described preparations. Pandan's record is nothing like that. It is scattered notes in regional ethnobotanical surveys, mostly of casual use, mostly as a pleasant drink or an aromatic.

This page documents what is actually claimed — including for pain, headache and arthritis, which are the claims most often repeated online — and labels the evidence tier for each. In most cases that tier is traditional use only or UNKNOWN. That is the correct finding for this plant, and stating it plainly is more useful than dressing a scatter of folk uses up as pharmacology.

Table of Contents

  1. What Kind of Traditional Record Pandan Has
  2. Regional Traditional Uses, Region by Region
  3. The Pain, Headache and Arthritis Claims
  4. External Application: Poultices, Oils and Baths
  5. The Anti-Inflammatory Evidence Such As It Is
  6. “Calming”, Restlessness and the Aroma Question
  7. The Diuretic and “Cooling” Claims
  8. Antimicrobial, Wound and Skin Uses
  9. Household and Non-Medicinal Traditional Uses
  10. Which Part, and Why the Root Keeps Appearing
  11. How to Read a Thin Traditional Record
  12. Evidence Tiers for This Page
  13. Key Research Papers
  14. Connections

What Kind of Traditional Record Pandan Has

Three characteristics define pandan's ethnobotanical footprint, and each has a direct bearing on how much weight the claims can carry.

It is a food plant first, by a very wide margin. In Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, the Philippines and Sri Lanka, pandan is a flavouring, a colouring and a wrapper. Ask a cook in any of those countries what pandan is for and the answer will be rice, kaya, cake or curry — not an ailment. Medicinal use is a minor sideline, and pandan's traditional record is best described as a food record with medicinal annotations.

It is domestic rather than professional. Where pandan appears medicinally it is generally in household practice — a mother making a cooling drink, a leaf added to a postpartum bath — rather than in a practitioner's dispensary. Malay jamu, Thai household remedies and Vietnamese thuốc nam all include pandan in this casual register. Household use is real ethnobotany, but it carries much less inferential weight than a formal tradition with dosing conventions and named indications, because nobody was tracking outcomes.

Its indications do not converge. This is the most telling point. In a strong traditional record, independent regions arrive at similar uses for the same plant — convergence across cultures is genuine, if weak, evidence that something is being observed. Pandan's claimed uses scatter: cooling here, diuretic there, restlessness elsewhere, a little for pain, a little for skin, a little for fever. There is no strong cross-cultural convergence on any single indication. That pattern is more consistent with a beloved aromatic being folded into remedies for its smell and palatability than with a plant whose effects people repeatedly noticed.

An important corollary, and a genuinely reassuring one: pandan's long, casual, food-quantity use by hundreds of millions of people is meaningful safety information. A plant used this freely for this long, including by children and in pregnancy, without a folk tradition of caution attached to it, is very unlikely to be acutely harmful in culinary amounts. That is what the traditional record actually establishes. It establishes nothing about efficacy.

Regional Traditional Uses, Region by Region

Every use below is traditional use only unless separately noted. None has been tested in a human trial.

Malaysia and Indonesia

Thailand

Vietnam

The Philippines

Sri Lanka and southern India

The Pacific

The Pain, Headache and Arthritis Claims

Search for pandan and you will find pain relief presented as one of its established benefits — usually headache, arthritis, chest pain and “body aches,” sometimes with an unsourced claim that pandan leaves have been “traditionally used as an analgesic.” Here is what actually stands behind that.

The traditional basis is real but slight. There are scattered ethnobotanical records of Pandanus species — not always P. amaryllifolius specifically — in preparations for aches, headache and rheumatic complaints across South and Southeast Asia, generally as part of a mixed formula or as an external application rather than as a single-herb internal remedy. Pandan leaf is also used in warm baths and steam preparations where the target is comfort and relaxation as much as pain.

What there is not:

Evidence tier: traditional use only, and weakly at that. Nothing here supports using pandan for a pain problem, and it is worth naming the specific harm in doing so: pain has causes. Arthritis pain benefits from diagnosis and from treatments with real evidence; a new headache pattern can need investigation; chest pain in particular is a symptom to take to a clinician, not to a teapot. A leaf infusion with no demonstrated analgesic action is a poor reason to delay any of that.

The honest framing: a warm, fragrant drink or a warm aromatic bath is genuinely comforting, and comfort is not nothing when you hurt. Comfort is also not analgesia, and pandan has not been shown to be an analgesic.

External Application: Poultices, Oils and Baths

External traditional uses of pandan are worth separating out, because they are chemically and practically different from drinking an infusion.

Evidence tier: traditional use only for all of the above. External pandan use is low-risk, which is a genuine advantage. Nothing about it has been studied in a controlled way.

The Anti-Inflammatory Evidence Such As It Is

“Anti-inflammatory” is the most elastic word in supplement marketing, so it is worth being precise about what exists for pandan.

What exists: pandan leaf contains ordinary plant phenolics — catechin, epicatechin, rutin, kaempferol, naringin, plus gallic, cinnamic and ferulic acids — quantified in the 2013 Malaysian profiling study by Ghasemzadeh and Jaafar in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Compounds of this class show antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity in laboratory assays as a matter of routine. The 2024 Fitoterapia review by Wang and colleagues surveys the reported pharmacological activities of the plant, all of it preclinical.

What that is worth: less than it sounds. Two points settle it.

First, the concentrations are unremarkable. Total phenolics in pandan leaf came out at roughly 5–7 mg per gram of dry weight, and total flavonoids around 1–2 mg/g. Those are low-to-middling figures for a green plant — green tea, clove and rosemary are an order of magnitude higher. Pandan is not a concentrated source of polyphenols, and calling it an anti-inflammatory on the strength of those numbers would be misleading.

Second, an antioxidant result in a test tube is not an anti-inflammatory result in a person. The most convincing antioxidant demonstration for pandan is a food-science one: a 2008 Food Chemistry study by Nor and colleagues showed pandan leaf extracts slowed oil degradation in accelerated-oxidation and repeated deep-frying trials, behaving as a natural alternative to synthetic antioxidants like BHA. That is a genuinely useful result — for cooking oil. It says nothing about oxidative stress inside a human body.

The same 2013 study also ran a cell-viability screen against the MCF-7 breast cancer line and reported 67–78% inhibition depending on growing location. Cell-line screens are a first-pass filter that a very large fraction of plant extracts pass, and only a tiny fraction of those ever lead anywhere. This is not evidence that pandan does anything to cancer, and it should never be presented as such.

Evidence tier: preliminary (in vitro) for the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory chemistry; no human evidence of any kind for an anti-inflammatory clinical effect.

“Calming”, Restlessness and the Aroma Question

Traditional use for restlessness and as a mild calming drink is one of pandan's more plausible claims, and it deserves a careful rather than a dismissive answer.

No sedative constituent has been identified in pandan. No compound with a described mechanism, no receptor target, no animal sedation data that has been replicated. There is no human study of pandan and sleep, anxiety or arousal. As pharmacology, the calming claim is UNKNOWN.

But aroma itself is not nothing. There is a substantial general literature on odour and mood, and pleasant familiar smells measurably affect self-reported mood and, in some studies, physiological arousal markers. Pandan's specific advantage here is associative: for anyone raised in Southeast Asia, the smell of pandan is the smell of home cooking, of childhood, of a grandmother's kitchen. A warm fragrant drink that smells like that will reliably feel comforting.

That is a real effect with a real mechanism — it is just not a pharmacological one, and it is not specific to pandan's chemistry. It would apply equally to any deeply familiar comforting smell. It also does not transfer: pandan will not have the same effect on someone encountering it for the first time.

Evidence tier: traditional use only, with a plausible non-pharmacological explanation (aroma, warmth, association) rather than a chemical one. Worth exactly what it is, which is something.

The Diuretic and “Cooling” Claims

The diuretic claim is pandan's most persistent traditional attribution, and it has an unglamorous likely explanation.

Traditional use is real: Thai practice in particular attributes diuretic action to the plant, principally the root. But no controlled human study of pandan's effect on urine output or on renal sodium handling has been published, so there is nothing to quantify.

The confound is straightforward and probably sufficient. Pandan's diuretic reputation attaches to a preparation that people drink in quantity because it tastes good. Drinking more fluid produces more urine. A palatable herbal tea will appear diuretic without any pharmacological action whatsoever, and this explanation should be preferred until someone runs the study that distinguishes them.

“Cooling” belongs to a traditional humoral framework rather than to physiology, and it is best understood on its own terms. Within Malay, Thai and Vietnamese traditional categories, pandan is a cooling plant, and that classification governs when and with what it is used. It is not a claim about body temperature and should not be translated into one.

Evidence tier: traditional use only; the most likely mechanism is fluid intake rather than pharmacology.

Antimicrobial, Wound and Skin Uses

Antimicrobial activity has been reported for pandan leaf extracts and essential oil in laboratory assays, and is summarised in the 2024 Fitoterapia review. Petri dishes, not patients — and here the gap is especially wide, because almost every plant extract inhibits something on an agar plate at some concentration.

Traditional skin and wound uses are scattered: crushed leaf for minor cuts, infusions as a wash, pandan in bathing preparations for skin comfort. Some traditional use exists for dandruff and scalp complaints.

Evidence tier: preliminary (in vitro) for antimicrobial activity; traditional use only for skin and wound applications; no human data.

One practical caution rather than a claim: infected wounds need proper care. A leaf poultice is not wound management, and pandan is often grown domestically or semi-wild in soil that may carry agricultural residue or contamination. If you use fresh pandan for anything, wash it.

Household and Non-Medicinal Traditional Uses

Worth recording, because they are the uses pandan is genuinely and demonstrably good at, and because they explain a great deal about why the plant is everywhere.

Which Part, and Why the Root Keeps Appearing

A recurring problem in writing about pandan's traditional medicine is that the medicinal claims and the culinary material are usually different parts of the plant.

Test any pandan health claim you encounter against those four lines. A surprising proportion collapse immediately, because they turn out to concern a part of the plant that culinary pandan does not have.

How to Read a Thin Traditional Record

Traditional use is genuine information, and this site's position is that it should be documented rather than dismissed. But it answers a narrower question than people usually assume. Traditional use tells you what people did. It does not tell you whether it worked.

Four things a traditional record can legitimately support:

  1. Rough safety in the traditional preparation and quantity. Pandan's case is strong here: enormous, casual, multigenerational food-quantity use with no folk tradition of caution.
  2. Cultural and culinary significance. Unambiguous for pandan.
  3. Hypotheses worth testing. The Thai root-and-diabetes thread genuinely did lead somewhere in the laboratory. That is traditional knowledge doing its proper job — generating a hypothesis.
  4. Preparation methods worth respecting. Cooks' rules about bruising, late addition and freezing rather than drying turn out to be exactly what the aroma chemistry predicts.

Four things it cannot support:

  1. Efficacy for any condition. Only a controlled trial can address that.
  2. Safety of a concentrated modern extract. A capsule is a different exposure from a knotted leaf. Pandan's poorly characterised alkaloids are the concrete reason why — see the safety and unknowns page.
  3. A dose. There is no established medicinal dose of pandan for anything.
  4. Transfer between species or plant parts. The single most common error in English-language writing about this genus.

Applied to pandan, that framework yields a clear and unembarrassing conclusion: a well-established food plant with excellent traditional safety credentials, a scattered and non-convergent set of household medicinal uses, and essentially no clinical evidence for any of them. That is a legitimate answer. It is not a failure of research, and it does not need padding.

Evidence Tiers for This Page

Key Research Papers

Links are PubMed topic searches rather than fixed records. Named papers have title, journal and year in the text. Several searches below will return few or no results — that absence is the finding, and it is why this section describes bodies of literature rather than listing many individual papers.

  1. Wang W and colleagues (2024). “Botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and applications of Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb.: a review,” Fitoterapia. The best single entry point; surveys traditional uses and the preclinical pharmacology, and reports no clinical trials. Search: Pandanus amaryllifolius review
  2. Ghasemzadeh A and Jaafar HZE (2013). “Profiling of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant and anticancer activities in pandan (Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb.) extracts from different locations of Malaysia,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Source of the total-phenolic and total-flavonoid figures, and of the MCF-7 cell-line screen. Search: pandan phenolic and antioxidant profiling
  3. Nor FM and colleagues (2008). “Antioxidative properties of Pandanus amaryllifolius leaf extracts in accelerated oxidation and deep frying studies,” Food Chemistry. The most convincing antioxidant demonstration — in cooking oil, not in people. Search: pandan leaf antioxidant frying oil stability
  4. Peungvicha P and colleagues (1998). “4-Hydroxybenzoic acid: a hypoglycemic constituent of aqueous extract of Pandanus odorus root,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology. The one place the Thai root tradition led to a laboratory result — root, purified compound, normal rats. Search: Pandanus odorus root hypoglycaemic constituent
  5. Pandan and analgesia or anti-nociception. Run this search and note how little comes back. That emptiness is the honest answer to the pain claim. Search: Pandanus analgesic / antinociceptive
  6. Pandan and anti-inflammatory activity. Preclinical only; no human studies. Search: Pandanus amaryllifolius anti-inflammatory
  7. Pandan antimicrobial activity. Laboratory assays on extracts and essential oil. Search: Pandanus amaryllifolius antimicrobial
  8. Pandanus alkaloids — pandamarilactones and relatives. A genus-specific alkaloid family of real interest to synthetic chemists and essentially unstudied pharmacologically. The concrete reason concentrated extracts are not equivalent to culinary use. Search: Pandanus alkaloids and pandamarilactones
  9. Southeast Asian ethnobotany and medicinal-plant surveys. The regional literature in which pandan's household uses are recorded, usually in passing. Search: Southeast Asian ethnobotanical surveys
  10. Malay jamu and traditional postpartum practice. Context for the preparations pandan appears in. Search: jamu and traditional postpartum herbal practice
  11. Odour, mood and physiological arousal. The general literature that plausibly explains pandan's “calming” reputation without invoking any pharmacology. Search: odour, mood and arousal in humans
  12. Pandanus tectorius — the Pacific species. A separate plant with separate uses and a separate literature, routinely mis-cited as pandan. Search: Pandanus tectorius traditional use
  13. Pandanus odorifer and kewra. The South Asian flowering species behind Ayurvedic screwpine references. Search: Pandanus odorifer, kewra and ketaki

External Resources

Connections


Safety note and disclaimer. Pandan leaf in culinary amounts has a long, broad record of ordinary safe use, including in pregnancy and childhood, across Southeast Asia. That record does not extend to concentrated extracts or supplements, which are unstudied and should be avoided in pregnancy and breastfeeding. Do not swallow the leaf itself — it is tough and fibrous and presents a choking and obstruction risk, particularly to young children. Nothing on this page describes a treatment for pain, inflammation or any other condition. Pain has causes: new or changing pain, joint pain that limits function, and chest pain in particular should be assessed by a clinician rather than self-treated with a herbal infusion. This article is general information for education, not medical advice.

Back to Table of Contents