Leishmaniasis


Table of Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Epidemiology
  3. Life Cycle and Pathophysiology
  4. Clinical Presentations
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Complications
  8. Prevention
  9. Research and Advances
  10. References
  11. PubMed Searches
  12. Connections
  13. Featured Videos

Overview

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne parasitic disease caused by more than 20 species of the protozoan genus Leishmania. It is transmitted to humans through the bite of infected female sandflies — Phlebotomus species in the Old World (Europe, Africa, Asia) and Lutzomyia species in the New World (the Americas). The disease presents in three major clinical forms: cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL), and visceral leishmaniasis (VL), also known as kala-azar.

Leishmaniasis ranks as the second most deadly parasitic disease worldwide after malaria. Approximately one billion people live in areas at risk for infection across 98 endemic countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 700,000 to one million new cases occur each year, with up to 30,000 deaths annually from visceral disease. The WHO classifies leishmaniasis as a neglected tropical disease (NTD), reflecting its disproportionate burden on the world's poorest populations.

Despite its global burden, leishmaniasis remains underfunded and underreported. Many cases go undiagnosed in resource-limited settings, and treatment options — while effective — carry significant toxicity risks. No licensed human vaccine currently exists, making vector control and early diagnosis central to disease management.

Back to Table of Contents


Epidemiology

The epidemiology of leishmaniasis varies sharply by clinical form and geographic region.

Visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) accounts for approximately 50,000–90,000 new cases per year globally, with about 90% concentrated in just six countries: India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sudan, Ethiopia, and Brazil. The Indian subcontinent carries the highest burden, where L. donovani is the predominant species. In East Africa, L. donovani is also responsible, while in South America L. chagasi (now considered synonymous with L. infantum) is the primary species, with domestic dogs serving as a major reservoir.

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is far more common, with 600,000 to one million new cases per year. It occurs across three broad geographic zones: the Americas (primarily L. braziliensis and L. amazonensis), the Middle East and Central Asia (L. major in arid zones), and the Mediterranean basin and Western Asia (L. tropica in urban settings). Afghanistan, Algeria, Colombia, and Brazil together account for a large proportion of cases.

Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis occurs almost exclusively in South America and is caused primarily by L. braziliensis. It affects roughly 1–10% of CL cases caused by this species.

Key risk factors include poverty, malnutrition (which suppresses the immune response needed to control infection), deforestation and urbanization (which bring humans closer to sandfly habitats), and displacement due to conflict. HIV coinfection dramatically worsens outcomes — visceral leishmaniasis becomes an AIDS-defining illness and greatly increases mortality and relapse rates. Travelers to endemic regions — military personnel, ecotourists, and aid workers — are at increasing risk.

Back to Table of Contents


Life Cycle and Pathophysiology

The Leishmania parasite alternates between two hosts and two morphological forms during its life cycle.

In the sandfly vector: When a female sandfly takes a blood meal from an infected mammal, it ingests amastigotes (the intracellular, non-flagellated form found in host tissue). Inside the sandfly midgut, amastigotes transform into promastigotes — elongated, flagellated, and highly motile forms. These promastigotes multiply and migrate to the sandfly's proboscis. When the sandfly feeds again, it injects promastigotes along with its saliva into the host's dermis.

In the mammalian host: Promastigotes are quickly recognized and engulfed by host macrophages and dendritic cells at the bite site. Inside the macrophage phagolysosome — an acidic, enzyme-rich compartment designed to destroy pathogens — Leishmania promastigotes transform into amastigotes. Rather than being destroyed, amastigotes have evolved mechanisms to neutralize lysosomal enzymes, inhibit phagolysosome acidification, and evade the respiratory burst. They replicate within the phagolysosome until the macrophage ruptures, releasing amastigotes to infect neighboring macrophages, dendritic cells, and monocytes.

Immune response and disease outcome: The balance between Th1 and Th2 immune responses largely determines whether infection is controlled or progresses to disease. A robust Th1 response — characterized by interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) production — activates macrophages to kill intracellular parasites via nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species. This response is associated with healing and resistance. A Th2-dominant response — with interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-10, and IL-13 — suppresses macrophage killing activity, promotes parasite survival, and permits dissemination. IL-10 in particular plays a central role in parasite persistence.

In visceral leishmaniasis, parasites disseminate through the reticuloendothelial system to the liver (Kupffer cells), spleen, and bone marrow. Massive immune activation leads to hypergammaglobulinemia (elevated IgG, IgM, IgA) and hypersplenism. Paradoxically, antigen-specific T-cell responses are suppressed even while non-specific B-cell activation is exuberant.

In mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, tissue destruction is driven not by unchecked parasite growth but by a dysregulated, excessive immune response — macrophages and T cells cause collateral damage to mucosal tissue while attempting to eliminate residual parasites.

Back to Table of Contents


Clinical Presentations

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL)

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is the most common form and presents days to weeks after the sandfly bite. The initial lesion is a painless papule that enlarges into a nodule and then ulcerates. The classic ulcer has a well-defined, raised, indurated border surrounding a clean base with granulation tissue — often described as a "volcano crater" appearance. In Latin America, lesions on the ear or face caused by L. braziliensis are called "chiclero ulcer." Lesions may be single or multiple, depending on the number of infectious bites and species involved.

Regional lymphadenopathy is common. Without treatment, lesions caused by many species (such as L. major) heal spontaneously within 2 months to 2 years, leaving a depressed scar. However, L. braziliensis infections carry a risk of progressing to mucocutaneous disease and should always be treated systemically. L. tropica and L. donovani can cause chronic non-healing CL.

Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis (MCL)

Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, caused primarily by L. braziliensis, develops months to years after the original cutaneous lesion. Parasites spread hematogenously from the skin to the mucosal membranes. The nasal mucosa is typically affected first, with congestion, epistaxis (nosebleeds), and progressive destruction of the nasal septum. Without treatment, the infection spreads to the palate, pharynx, and larynx.

Advanced MCL produces the characteristic "tapir nose" — collapse and saddle deformity of the nasal bridge from septal destruction. Severe disease causes disfigurement and can compromise the airway, leading to aspiration pneumonia and death. Crucially, MCL is driven in part by an excessive immune response: patients often have high parasite-specific T-cell responses, yet tissue destruction continues. This makes MCL difficult to treat and prone to relapse.

Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL / Kala-Azar)

The term "kala-azar" derives from the Hindi for "black fever," a reference to the dark hyperpigmentation of the skin — particularly on the face, hands, and abdomen — seen in some patients. VL has an insidious onset, with symptoms developing over weeks to months after infection. The hallmark features are:

Left untreated, visceral leishmaniasis is almost uniformly fatal — mortality approaches 95–100% within 2 years. Death is typically caused by secondary infections such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, or dysentery, rather than by direct parasite damage. Profound immunosuppression leaves patients unable to mount an effective defense against these opportunistic pathogens.

Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL)

PKDL is a delayed complication that develops after apparently successful treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. It is most common in India, where up to 10–20% of treated VL patients develop it, and in Sudan. PKDL presents as hypopigmented (and sometimes hyperpigmented) macules that progress to nodules and plaques, predominantly on the face, trunk, and extremities. PKDL patients harbor viable parasites in skin lesions and serve as an important reservoir for ongoing sandfly transmission — making treatment not only a clinical priority but a public health imperative.

Back to Table of Contents


Diagnosis

Diagnosis of leishmaniasis combines clinical judgment with laboratory confirmation, and the approach differs by clinical form.

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Visceral Leishmaniasis

Back to Table of Contents


Treatment

Treatment decisions for leishmaniasis depend on the clinical form, the infecting Leishmania species, the geographic region, and the patient's immune status. No single drug is universally applicable.

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis — Self-Healing Species

For CL caused by species with a tendency to self-heal (e.g., L. major, L. mexicana), treatment is guided by lesion size, number, location, and patient preference. Small, uncomplicated lesions may be observed. Local treatment options include intralesional injections of pentavalent antimonials (Sbv), cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen, or thermotherapy (localized heat application at 50°C for 30 seconds). Systemic therapy is indicated for multiple or large lesions, facial lesions, or immunocompromised patients.

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis — L. braziliensis (MCL Risk)

All cases of CL caused by L. braziliensis should receive systemic treatment to prevent progression to mucocutaneous disease. First-line options include:

Established MCL requires higher doses of Sbv for 30 days. Sbv-refractory MCL is treated with liposomal amphotericin B or conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate.

Visceral Leishmaniasis — First-Line by Region

South Asia (India, Bangladesh, Nepal): Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) at 10 mg/kg intravenously achieves cure rates exceeding 95% with excellent tolerability. This is now the WHO-recommended first-line treatment for the Indian subcontinent and represents a major therapeutic advance. Alternatives include miltefosine (2.5 mg/kg/day × 28 days), paromomycin (11 mg/kg/day IM × 21 days), or combination regimens to shorten treatment duration and reduce resistance pressure.

East Africa: Liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg on days 1–5, 14, and 21, totaling 21 mg/kg) is recommended. Alternatively, Sbv (20 mg/kg/day × 30 days) remains in use where monitoring permits, or combination Sbv plus paromomycin for 17 days. Due to variable Sbv efficacy in different African regions, treatment is often guided by national programs.

South America: Sbv (20 mg/kg/day × 30 days) remains the standard of care, given lower resistance rates and limited availability of liposomal AmB. Liposomal AmB is used for treatment failures.

Toxicity of Pentavalent Antimonials (Sbv)

Sbv drugs (meglumine antimoniate, sodium stibogluconate) are highly effective but carry serious toxicity risks that require monitoring:

HIV-Leishmaniasis Coinfection

HIV-VL coinfection demands aggressive treatment and long-term secondary prophylaxis. Liposomal amphotericin B is the treatment of choice. Following successful treatment, monthly liposomal AmB (3–5 mg/kg) is given as secondary prophylaxis until CD4 counts rise above 200 cells/μL on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Despite treatment, relapse rates exceed 50% in HIV-coinfected patients, and atypical presentations (involving unusual anatomical sites such as the GI tract, lungs, or skin) are common. The prognosis remains significantly worse than in immunocompetent patients.

Back to Table of Contents


Complications

Leishmaniasis — particularly the visceral form — carries a spectrum of potentially life-threatening complications:

Back to Table of Contents


Prevention

There is currently no licensed vaccine for human leishmaniasis, placing the burden of prevention on personal protection, vector control, and reservoir management.

Personal protection measures:

Vector control:

Reservoir control:

Traveler guidance: Travelers to endemic regions should apply DEET repellent, wear permethrin-treated clothing, use fine-mesh bed nets, and sleep in screened accommodations. No chemoprophylaxis regimen is available. Any traveler returning with a skin ulcer that does not heal within 2–4 weeks after visiting an endemic area should be evaluated for cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Back to Table of Contents


Research and Advances

Leishmaniasis research has accelerated in recent years, driven in part by the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) and international partnerships committed to eliminating VL from the Indian subcontinent by 2030.

New drug candidates:

Vaccine development:

Drug resistance mechanisms:

Diagnostics:

Back to Table of Contents


References

  1. Alvar J, Vélez ID, Bern C, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35671. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671 — PMID 22693548
  2. Bern C, Maguire JH, Alvar J. Complexities of assessing the disease burden attributable to leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e313. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000313 — PMID 18958148
  3. Sundar S, Rai M. Laboratory diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002;9:951–958. DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.5.951-958.2002 — PMID 12204944
  4. Reithinger R, Dujardin JC, Louzir H, et al. Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:581–596. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70209-8 — PMID 17714672
  5. Sundar S, Chakravarty J. Leishmaniasis: an update of current pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14:53–63. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2013.755022 — PMID 23256501
  6. Bhattacharya SK, Sur D, Sinha PK, et al. Elimination of kala-azar and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84:816–824. DOI: 10.2471/blt.05.031997 — PMID 17128352
  7. Bern C, Adler-Moore J, Berenguer J, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:917–924. DOI: 10.1086/507530 — PMID 16941373
  8. Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. Drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:111–126. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006 — PMID 16418525
  9. Murray HW, Berman JD, Davies CR, et al. Advances in leishmaniasis. Lancet. 2005;366:1561–1577. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67629-5 — PMID 16257344
  10. Desjeux P. Leishmaniasis: current situation and new perspectives. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;27:305–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2004.03.004 — PMID 15225981
  11. Chappuis F, Sundar S, Hailu A, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:873–882. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1748 — PMID 17938629
  12. Goto H, Lindoso JA. Current diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8:419–433. DOI: 10.1586/eri.10.19 — PMID 20377337

Back to Table of Contents


PubMed Searches

The following PubMed search links provide access to the latest peer-reviewed research on leishmaniasis:

  1. Visceral leishmaniasis treatment
  2. Cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis
  3. Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis L. braziliensis
  4. Liposomal amphotericin B for kala-azar
  5. Leishmaniasis HIV coinfection
  6. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL)
  7. Leishmaniasis vaccine clinical trials
  8. Miltefosine resistance in leishmaniasis

Back to Table of Contents


Connections

Back to Table of Contents