Heart Block

Table of Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Types and Classification
  3. Causes and Triggers
  4. Symptoms
  5. ECG and Diagnostic Findings
  6. Treatment
  7. Natural and Lifestyle Approaches
  8. Complications and Prognosis
  9. Emergency Warning Signs
  10. Key Research Papers
  11. Connections
  12. Featured Videos

Back to Table of Contents

1. Overview

Heart block — also called atrioventricular (AV) block — is a disorder of the cardiac conduction system in which the electrical impulse generated by the sinoatrial (SA) node in the right atrium is delayed or blocked from reaching the ventricles through the AV node and His-Purkinje system. The result is a slowing or dissociation of atrial and ventricular electrical activity, with varying clinical consequences ranging from asymptomatic to life-threatening hemodynamic collapse.

Under normal conditions, the electrical impulse travels from the SA node → atria → AV node → Bundle of His → left and right bundle branches → Purkinje fibers → ventricular myocardium, producing a normal PR interval of 120–200 ms on the surface ECG. A PR interval exceeding 200 ms (one large box on standard ECG paper) defines first-degree AV block. More advanced block produces dropped beats or complete AV dissociation.

Heart block is classified by severity — first, second (Mobitz type I or II), and third degree — each with distinct ECG patterns, clinical significance, and management implications. In outline:


Back to Table of Contents

2. Types and Classification

First-Degree AV Block

Defined as a PR interval >200 ms (one large box, or 5 small boxes, on standard 25 mm/sec ECG paper) on every beat, with all P waves conducted to the ventricles. The PR interval prolongation reflects delayed conduction through the AV node, but every atrial impulse eventually reaches the ventricles. No beats are "dropped."

First-degree AV block is not truly a "block" in the sense of any impulse failing to conduct — it is a conduction delay. The PR interval may be markedly prolonged (300–400 ms or more) without symptoms. It is seen in trained athletes (vagal tone), with age-related fibrosis, and in many systemic conditions affecting the AV node.

Second-Degree AV Block — Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach)

Classic Wenckebach pattern (named for the Dutch physician Karel F. Wenckebach, who described it in 1899 from radial pulse tracings, before clinical electrocardiography existed; PubMed PMID: 9890852): progressive PR interval prolongation with each successive beat until one P wave fails to conduct (dropped QRS). After the dropped beat, the cycle resets and PR interval shortens back toward baseline before the progressive prolongation begins again.

Key ECG features of Mobitz I:

Anatomical location: AV nodal block. The AV node is richly innervated by the vagus nerve and responds to changes in autonomic tone. Wenckebach is often benign, physiologic, and reversible.

Second-Degree AV Block — Mobitz Type II

Named after the German internist Woldemar Mobitz, who classified second-degree AV block into two types in 1924; in his series type II block frequently progressed to complete block (PubMed PMID: 15339865). In Mobitz type II, P waves are conducted with a constant, unchanging PR interval until one P wave suddenly fails to conduct (dropped QRS) without any preceding PR prolongation. The block occurs below the AV node — in the His bundle or bundle branches.

Key ECG features of Mobitz II:

Anatomical location: Infranodal block (His bundle or bundle branches). This is the dangerous distinction: a 2001 review of second-degree block states that all correctly defined type II blocks are infranodal and that infranodal blocks require pacing regardless of form or symptoms; such block can progress unpredictably to complete heart block, and the escape rhythm that then takes over (from ventricular tissue below the block) is slow, wide-complex, and unreliable (PubMed PMID: 11155413).

2:1 AV Block — The Diagnostic Dilemma

When every other P wave is blocked (2:1 conduction), it cannot be classified as Mobitz I or Mobitz II on the ECG alone — PR behaviour cannot be observed with only one conducted beat per cycle — although the block itself can be either nodal or infranodal (PubMed PMID: 11155413). Clues to distinguish:

Third-Degree (Complete) AV Block

Complete absence of AV conduction — no atrial impulses reach the ventricles. The atria and ventricles beat independently (AV dissociation). The ventricles are maintained by an escape pacemaker located below the site of block:

ECG in complete heart block: regular P waves at the (faster) atrial rate and regular QRS complexes at the (slower) escape rate, with no relationship between the two (dissociated, "marching through" independently); no consistent PR interval exists. A 2021 review defines third-degree block as the failure of each P wave to conduct to the ventricles, giving complete AV dissociation with no evidence of AV conduction (Search PubMed).

Lenegre-Lev Disease

Progressive cardiac conduction disease in adults without other structural heart disease is classically attributed to Lenegre-Lev disease — idiopathic fibrosis and sclerosis of the cardiac conduction system. Lenegre disease is named for Jean Lenegre's 1964 pathology study of bilateral bundle branch block in relation to complete heart block (PubMed PMID: 14153648); Lev disease for Maurice Lev's 1964 review of the pathology of complete AV block (PubMed PMID: 14105712), in which fibrosis reaches the conduction system from the cardiac fibrous skeleton (aging, calcific aortic stenosis, mitral annular calcification). Clinically, the two processes are indistinguishable, and the eponym is often combined. Both lead to progressive bundle branch block progressing to complete heart block over years to decades. SCN5A gene variants (sodium channel mutations) were linked to familial cardiac conduction defects in 1999 (PubMed PMID: 10471492).


Back to Table of Contents

3. Causes and Triggers

Structural and Degenerative Causes

Infectious Causes

Autoimmune Causes

Drug-Induced Heart Block

Metabolic and Electrolyte Causes

Infiltrative Causes


Back to Table of Contents

4. Symptoms

First-Degree AV Block

Typically asymptomatic. Occasionally, patients with very prolonged PR intervals (>300 ms) may experience symptoms from the timing mismatch between atrial and ventricular contractions ("pacemaker syndrome" physiology): reduced cardiac output, fatigue, or reduced exercise tolerance. This is termed "AV dyssynchrony" and is rare.

Second-Degree Mobitz I (Wenckebach)

Usually asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, particularly in the setting of lower resting heart rates. Some patients note:

Second-Degree Mobitz II

More likely to be symptomatic than Mobitz I due to the unpredictable nature of dropped beats and the infranodal site of block:

Third-Degree (Complete) Heart Block

Symptoms depend critically on the rate and reliability of the escape rhythm:


Back to Table of Contents

5. ECG and Diagnostic Findings

Surface ECG — The Primary Diagnostic Tool

The 12-lead ECG is central to diagnosing and classifying heart block. Key measurements:

ECG Pattern by Type

Holter Monitoring and Event Recorders

Paroxysmal or intermittent heart block — particularly relevant for unexplained syncope — may not be captured on a resting 12-lead ECG. Ambulatory monitoring options:

Electrophysiology Study (EPS)

Invasive catheter recording of His bundle electrograms (H-V interval) precisely localizes the block site:

Additional Investigations


Back to Table of Contents

6. Treatment

First-Degree AV Block

First-degree block without symptoms is generally not treated. Management consists of looking for reversible causes (medication review, electrolyte correction) and follow-up ECGs for progression. In athletes with first-degree block from high vagal tone, the block may resolve with detraining.

Second-Degree Mobitz I (Wenckebach)

Management is generally expectant for asymptomatic patients with Wenckebach at the AV node level:

Second-Degree Mobitz II

Because Mobitz II can progress unpredictably to complete heart block, it is treated with a pacemaker whether or not there are symptoms:

Complete (Third-Degree) Heart Block

Complete heart block is treated with pacing. Acute management:

Pacemaker Types

Reversible Causes — Treating the Underlying Disease


Back to Table of Contents

7. Natural and Lifestyle Approaches

Important Caveat

Heart block that needs pacing is a structural electrical problem; there is no evidence that lifestyle measures or supplements reverse it or replace a pacemaker. The points below concern electrolytes and substances that can affect AV conduction. Decisions about medicines and supplements belong with a clinician.

Electrolytes and Conduction

Drugs and Supplements That Can Affect Conduction

Several non-prescription products and supplements are reported to slow AV conduction:

Exercise and Activity

How exertion affects the block depends on its level. A 2021 expert consensus statement notes that block above the His bundle generally resolves with the increased sympathetic tone of exercise, while second- or third-degree block appearing during exercise points to disease within the His-Purkinje system — rare, but associated with a poor prognosis (PubMed PMID: 34333141):

Vagal Maneuver Awareness

In AV nodal block (first-degree, Wenckebach), activities that increase vagal tone transiently worsen AV nodal conduction: the Valsalva maneuver, breath-holding, straining during bowel movements, and carotid sinus pressure. These maneuvers do not affect infranodal block.


Back to Table of Contents

8. Complications and Prognosis

Progression of Block

The main prognostic concern is progression to higher-degree block, particularly from Mobitz II to complete heart block — already noted in Mobitz's 1924 series (PubMed PMID: 15339865). Progression can be sudden (during acute MI), subacute (over days in infective endocarditis), or gradual (over years in Lenegre-Lev disease). Block shown to be infranodal at EPS (below the His bundle) is, in the words of a 2001 review, an indication for pacing regardless of form or symptoms (PubMed PMID: 11155413).

Sudden Cardiac Death

The primary fatal complication of unrecognized or untreated high-degree AV block is sudden cardiac death from asystole or ventricular fibrillation during a Stokes-Adams attack. In previously healthy patients with complete heart block, death may occur before medical evaluation if the escape rhythm is absent or unreliable.

Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy

Right ventricular apex pacing (the most common pacing site) produces dyssynchronous ventricular contraction — the paced ventricle activates from the apex rather than through the normal His-Purkinje network — effectively creating an LBBB pattern. This dyssynchrony can lead to LV dysfunction: in a 2014 study of 257 patients with normal baseline function and at least 20% RV pacing, 19.5% developed pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (LVEF falling by 10 points or more to below 50%) over a mean of 3.3 years, more often men and those with a wider native QRS (PubMed PMID: 24893122). His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing are newer strategies that preserve synchronous ventricular activation.

Pacemaker Complications

Prognosis


Back to Table of Contents

9. Emergency Warning Signs

The following are treated as medical emergencies:


Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

The following peer-reviewed studies represent key evidence in heart block research and management:

  1. Epstein AE, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update Incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(3):e6–e75 — Comprehensive pacing indications guidelines. — PubMed PMID: 23265327
  2. Josephson ME. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, 4th ed. Chapter 4: Electrophysiologic assessment of conduction system disease. 2008 — Textbook (not indexed in PubMed); EPS data on HV interval and risk stratification. — Search PubMed
  3. Brignole M, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(29):2281–2329. — PubMed PMID: 23801822
  4. Kusumoto FM, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(7):e51–e156. — Current US guidelines for bradycardia and heart block management. — PubMed PMID: 30412709
  5. Lev M. The pathology of complete atrioventricular block. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1964;6:317–326 — Lev's foundational description of fibroskeletal encroachment on the conduction system. — PubMed PMID: 14105712
  6. Lenegre J. Etiology and pathology of bilateral bundle branch block in relation to complete heart block. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1964;6:409–444 — Lenegre's description of primary sclerodegeneration. — PubMed PMID: 14153648
  7. Schott JJ, et al. Cardiac conduction defects associate with mutations in SCN5A. Nat Genet. 1999;23(1):20–21 — SCN5A mutation causing familial progressive cardiac conduction disease. — PubMed PMID: 10471492
  8. Steere AC, Batsford WP, Weinberg M, et al. Lyme carditis: cardiac abnormalities of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93(1):8–16. — PubMed PMID: 6967274
  9. Buyon JP, Hiebert R, Copel J, et al. Autoimmune-associated congenital heart block: demographics, mortality, morbidity and recurrence rates obtained from a national neonatal lupus registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(7):1658–1666. — PubMed PMID: 9626848
  10. Barold SS, Hayes DL. Second-degree atrioventricular block: a reappraisal. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76(1):44–57. — PubMed PMID: 11155413
  11. Bergfeldt L. HLA-B27-associated cardiac disease. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(8 Pt 1):621–629 — AV block in ankylosing spondylitis. — PubMed PMID: 9341061
  12. Huang W, Su L, Wu S, et al. A novel pacing strategy with low and stable output: pacing the left bundle branch immediately beyond the conduction block. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(12):1736.e1–1736.e3 — First report of left bundle branch pacing. — PubMed PMID: 29173611
  13. Upshaw CB Jr, Silverman ME. The Wenckebach phenomenon: a salute and comment on the centennial of its original description. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(1):58–63. — PubMed PMID: 9890852
  14. Silverman ME, Upshaw CB Jr, Lange HW. Woldemar Mobitz and his 1924 classification of second-degree atrioventricular block. Circulation. 2004;110(9):1162–1167. — PubMed PMID: 15339865
  15. Yeung C, Baranchuk A. Diagnosis and treatment of Lyme carditis: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(6):717–726. — PubMed PMID: 30765038
  16. Lantos PM, Rumbaugh J, Bockenstedt LK, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the IDSA, AAN, and ACR: 2020 Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(1):e1–e48. — PubMed PMID: 33417672
  17. Kandolin R, Lehtonen J, Kupari M. Cardiac sarcoidosis and giant cell myocarditis as causes of atrioventricular block in young and middle-aged adults. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(3):303–309. — PubMed PMID: 21427276
  18. Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(21):1883–1948. — PubMed PMID: 29562304
  19. Khurshid S, Epstein AE, Verdino RJ, et al. Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(9):1619–1625. — PubMed PMID: 24893122
  20. Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, et al. Clinical outcomes of His bundle pacing compared to right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(20):2319–2330. — PubMed PMID: 29535066
  21. Kirkfeldt RE, Johansen JB, Nohr EA, et al. Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(18):1186–1194. — PubMed PMID: 24347317
  22. Kirkfeldt RE, Johansen JB, Nohr EA, et al. Pneumothorax in cardiac pacing: a population-based cohort study of 28,860 Danish patients. Europace. 2012;14(8):1132–1138. — PubMed PMID: 22431443
  23. Richards JR, Blohm E, Toles KA, et al. The association of cannabis use and cardiac dysrhythmias: a systematic review. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2020;58(9):861–869. — PubMed PMID: 32267189
  24. Kontani M, Hara A, Ohta S, Ikeda T. Hypermagnesemia induced by massive cathartic ingestion in an elderly woman without pre-existing renal dysfunction. Intern Med. 2005;44(5):448–452 (case report). — PubMed PMID: 15942092
  25. Çinier G, Haseeb S, Bazoukis G, et al. Evaluation and management of asymptomatic bradyarrhythmias. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(1):60–67. — Search PubMed
  26. Meloy P, Rutz D, Bhambri A. 3rd-degree atrioventricular block. J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2022;7(2):O1–O28. — PubMed PMID: 37465444
  27. Bisignani A, De Bonis S, Mancuso L, et al. Implantable loop recorder in clinical practice. J Arrhythm. 2019;35(1):25–32. — PubMed PMID: 30805041
  28. Writing Committee Members; Shah MJ, Silka MJ, Avari Silva JN, et al. 2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021;21(6):367–393. — PubMed PMID: 34333141
  29. Savelieva I, Fumagalli S, Kenny RA, et al. EHRA expert consensus document on the management of arrhythmias in frailty syndrome. Europace. 2023;25(4):1249–1276. — PubMed PMID: 37061780
  30. Aryal B, Mandal P, Meyer MF. Adjuvant cilostazol therapy to help restore atrioventricular conduction in Lyme carditis. JACC Case Rep. 2026;31(10):106574 (case report). — PubMed PMID: 41817257

PubMed searches for further reading:

  1. PubMed: AV block pacemaker indications
  2. PubMed: Mobitz type II heart block
  3. PubMed: Wenckebach AV block
  4. PubMed: Complete heart block treatment
  5. PubMed: Lenegre Lev disease conduction
  6. PubMed: His bundle pacing outcomes

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents