Liver Phase 1 and Phase 2 Biotransformation

Liver Phase 1 and Phase 2 — scientific infographic poster

The body is exposed to many foreign compounds (xenobiotics) — from food components to environmental chemicals to drugs — and the liver handles many of the fat-soluble ones in two broad steps. Phase 1 is mainly oxidation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, which add or expose a reactive group on the molecule. Phase 2 is conjugation: transferase enzymes attach a water-soluble group (glucuronic acid, sulfate, glutathione, an acetyl or methyl group, or an amino acid), and the conjugates are generally more water-soluble and more easily excreted than the parent compound. Reviews of P450 toxicology describe both faces of Phase 1: it often makes a drug less harmful, but it can also convert (“bioactivate”) a chemical into a reactive, more toxic product, which Phase 2 enzymes such as the glutathione S-transferases help to neutralize.


Table of Contents

  1. The Two-Phase Pipeline Overview
  2. Phase 1: Cytochrome P450 Oxidation
  3. Phase 2: The Six Conjugation Pathways
  4. The Phase 1 / Phase 2 Mismatch Problem
  5. Genetic Polymorphisms (CYP, NAT2, COMT, GST)
  6. Nutrient Cofactor Requirements
  7. Foods, Herbs, and Supplements Studied
  8. Drug-Drug-Food Interactions (the Practical Stakes)
  9. Testing Phase 1 / Phase 2 Function
  10. Cautions and Contraindications
  11. Key Research Papers
  12. Connections
  13. Featured Videos

The Two-Phase Pipeline Overview

Many xenobiotics are fat-soluble (lipophilic), while the body excretes waste mainly in water-based fluids — urine and bile. Phase 2 conjugates are generally more hydrophilic than their parent compounds and are eliminated more easily through bile or urine (Jancova 2010).

The two main enzyme systems — the NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase / cytochrome P450 system for Phase 1 and the UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) for Phase 2 — are both located in the endoplasmic reticulum, where many drugs are metabolized in sequence (Iyanagi 2007):

  1. Phase 1 (Functionalization) — cytochrome P450 enzymes oxidize the molecule, adding or exposing a functional group. Guengerich's 2008 review describes many well-defined examples in which this step decreases a drug's adverse effects, and an equally large field in which it bioactivates chemicals, including drugs, into reactive products. CYP2E1 is a prominent example: Lieber's 1997 review lists 85 xenobiotics that it can activate to hepatotoxic or carcinogenic products, and its oxidation of ethanol produces acetaldehyde, a highly reactive and toxic metabolite.
  2. Phase 2 (Conjugation) — transferase enzymes attach a polar group to the molecule. Jancova and colleagues describe Phase 2 reactions as generally serving as a detoxifying step, producing conjugates that are more hydrophilic than the parent compounds, and note that reduced Phase 2 capacity can lead to toxic effects of clinically used drugs.

A third stage, sometimes called Phase 3 (transport), covers the membrane pumps that move conjugates out of liver cells. For acetaminophen, the glucuronide, sulfate and glutathione conjugates are excreted by transporters in the canalicular membrane facing bile (MRP2 and BCRP) and in the basolateral membrane facing blood (MRP3 and MRP4) (McGill 2013). Transporters are also part of drug interactions: rifampicin induces intestinal and hepatic P-glycoprotein and can lower the levels of a drug that is not metabolized at all, such as digoxin (Niemi 2003).

Back to Table of Contents

Phase 1: Cytochrome P450 Oxidation

The human genome carries 57 CYP genes in 18 families (Nebert 2013). Of the 57 putatively functional human CYPs, only about a dozen, in the CYP1, CYP2 and CYP3 families, are responsible for the biotransformation of most foreign substances, including 70–80% of all drugs in clinical use; the forms most highly expressed in the liver are CYP3A4, 2C9, 2C8, 2E1 and 1A2 (Zanger 2013). The enzymes are heme proteins — Omura and Sato's 1964 work on the “carbon monoxide-binding pigment of liver microsomes” established its hemoprotein nature — and they receive electrons from NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase (Iyanagi 2007).

Enzymes discussed on this page:

When reactive Phase 1 products are not detoxified, they can damage cells. In acetaminophen toxicity, the reactive metabolite depletes liver glutathione and binds cellular proteins, and the protein binding leads to oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage (McGill 2013). Guengerich lists the overall contribution of bioactivation to idiosyncratic drug reactions as one of the field's unresolved problems (Guengerich 2008).

Back to Table of Contents

Phase 2: The Six Conjugation Pathways

Jancova's 2010 review lists six conjugation reactions — glucuronidation, sulfation, methylation, acetylation, glutathione conjugation and amino acid conjugation — carried out mostly by transferase enzymes:

  1. Glucuronidation (UGT enzymes; donor UDP-glucuronic acid, UDPGA) — in humans, conjugation with glucuronic acid is described as by far the most important of these pathways (Jancova 2010). Most of an acetaminophen dose is eliminated by glucuronidation (UGT1A1 and 1A6) and sulfation (McGill 2013). UGT1A1 is the only enzyme that contributes substantially to bilirubin glucuronidation; in Gilbert syndrome, hepatic glucuronidating activity is reduced to about 30% of normal (Bosma 1995). Jancova's review puts Gilbert syndrome at approximately 10% of the population.
  2. Sulfation (SULT enzymes; donor 3'-phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate, PAPS) — PAPS is the universal sulfonate donor for all sulfonation reactions and can be synthesized by all mammalian tissues. Sulfonation handles steroids, catecholamines, serotonin, iodothyronines and other small endogenous molecules, as well as drugs (Jancova 2010).
  3. Glutathione conjugation (GST enzymes; cofactor glutathione) — GSTs form thioether conjugates between glutathione and hydrophobic, electrophilic compounds and play a major role in detoxifying epoxides derived from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and alpha-beta unsaturated ketones (Jancova 2010). Glutathione is the most abundant non-protein thiol in mammalian tissues; its synthesis depends on the availability of the sulfur amino acid cysteine and on the rate-limiting enzyme glutamate cysteine ligase (Lu 2013). The reactive acetaminophen metabolite depletes liver glutathione (McGill 2013), and alcoholism with its associated malnutrition has been proposed to lower glutathione concentrations (Seeff 1986).
  4. Acetylation (NAT1 and NAT2; donor acetyl-coenzyme A) — acetylates aromatic amines and hydrazines. NAT2 is a major route for the detoxification of isoniazid, hydralazine and sulfonamide antibiotics, and variation in the NAT genes produces slow, intermediate and rapid acetylator phenotypes (Jancova 2010).
  5. Methylation (COMT, TPMT and others; donor S-adenosylmethionine, SAMe) — COMT transfers a methyl group from SAMe to catecholamines, and TPMT methylates the thiopurine drugs 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine and azathioprine (Jancova 2010). COMT also inactivates catechol drugs such as L-DOPA (Lachman 1996).
  6. Amino acid conjugation (mainly glycine) — glycine N-acyltransferase (GLYAT) conjugates glycine to acyl-CoA intermediates, a pathway that maintains free coenzyme A; only a small number of pharmaceutical drugs are conjugated to glycine (Badenhorst 2013). The preservative benzoate is conjugated to glycine to form hippurate; Badenhorst and colleagues argue in a 2014 review that this glycine conjugation of dietary benzoate worsens a dietary glycine shortage in humans.

Back to Table of Contents

The Phase 1 / Phase 2 Mismatch Problem

A recurring theme in toxicology reviews is that harm depends on the balance between activation and detoxification. Hayes and Pulford note that many compounds that induce glutathione S-transferases are themselves GST substrates, or are converted by cytochrome P450 into GST substrates, and they interpret GST induction as part of an adaptive response to chemical stress caused by electrophiles (Hayes 1995).

Examples from the research:

The sources reviewed here give no validated way to measure this balance in an individual. Hodges and Minich's 2015 review of foods and detoxification pathways notes that many nutrients exert biphasic, dose-dependent effects and that genetic polymorphisms may alter outcomes, and it calls for caution given the limits of current research.

Back to Table of Contents

Genetic Polymorphisms (CYP, NAT2, COMT, GST)

Inherited variation in these enzymes is common and differs by ancestry: a pooled analysis of more than 15,000 control subjects found major differences in the frequencies of CYP1A1, CYP2E1, CYP2D6, GSTM1, GSTT1, NAT2, GSTP and EPHX variants between Caucasian, Asian and African or African-American populations (Garte 2001). Examples:

Commercial genotyping services report some of these variants. Zanger and Schwab describe polymorphisms in CYP2D6, 2C19, 2C9, 2B6, 3A5 and 2A6 as having growing evidence of clinical significance, while polymorphisms in CYP1A1, 1A2, 2C8, 2E1, 2J2 and 3A4 are generally less predictive (Zanger 2013).

Back to Table of Contents

Nutrient Cofactor Requirements

Each pathway depends on a donor molecule or cofactor:

The sources reviewed here do not establish that ordinary dietary intake limits any of these pathways in healthy people. Lu's review lists conditions in which glutathione synthesis is dysregulated, including diabetes, pulmonary and liver fibrosis, alcoholic liver disease, cholestatic liver injury and endotoxemia (Lu 2013), and Badenhorst and colleagues argue that benzoate conjugation draws on dietary glycine (Badenhorst 2014).

Back to Table of Contents

Foods, Herbs, and Supplements Studied

The following have been studied for effects on Phase 1 and Phase 2 enzymes. Several findings come from cell or animal studies, as noted.

Back to Table of Contents

Drug-Drug-Food Interactions (the Practical Stakes)

Biotransformation enzymes and transporters are the mechanism behind many clinically important drug interactions. Examples from the research:

Niemi and colleagues write that potential drug interactions need to be considered whenever rifampicin is started or stopped. Decisions about medicines and supplements belong with a clinician.

Back to Table of Contents

Testing Phase 1 / Phase 2 Function

Liska's 1998 review of the detoxification enzyme systems also covers laboratory tests used to assess them (Liska 1998). Approaches described in the research:

Back to Table of Contents

Cautions and Contraindications

The research raises concerns in several situations:

Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

  1. Guengerich FP (2008). Cytochrome P450 and chemical toxicology. Chemical Research in Toxicology — PubMed PMID: 18052394
  2. Liska DJ (1998). The detoxification enzyme systems. Alternative Medicine Review — PubMed PMID: 9630736
  3. Iyanagi T (2007). Molecular mechanism of phase I and phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes: implications for detoxification. International Review of Cytology — PubMed PMID: 17482904
  4. Lieber CS (1997). Cytochrome P-4502E1: its physiological and pathological role. Physiological Reviews — PubMed PMID: 9114822
  5. Egner PA, Chen JG, Zarth AT, et al. (2014). Rapid and sustainable detoxication of airborne pollutants by broccoli sprout beverage: results of a randomized clinical trial in China. Cancer Prevention Research — PubMed PMID: 24913818
  6. Fahey JW, Zhang Y, Talalay P (1997). Broccoli sprouts: an exceptionally rich source of inducers of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA — PubMed PMID: 9294217
  7. Saller R, Meier R, Brignoli R (2001). The use of silymarin in the treatment of liver diseases. Drugs — PubMed PMID: 11735632
  8. Hodges RE, Minich DM (2015). Modulation of metabolic detoxification pathways using foods and food-derived components: a scientific review with clinical application. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism — PubMed PMID: 26167297
  9. Hu R, Khor TO, Shen G, et al. (2006). Cancer chemoprevention of intestinal polyposis in ApcMin/+ mice by sulforaphane, a natural product derived from cruciferous vegetable. Carcinogenesis — PubMed PMID: 16675473
  10. Smith MT (2010). Advances in understanding benzene health effects and susceptibility. Annual Review of Public Health — PubMed PMID: 20070208
  11. Hayes JD, Pulford DJ (1995). The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology — PubMed PMID: 8770536
  12. Ingelman-Sundberg M (2005). Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6): clinical consequences, evolutionary aspects and functional diversity. The Pharmacogenomics Journal — PubMed PMID: 15492763
  13. Zanger UM, Schwab M (2013). Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacology & Therapeutics — PubMed PMID: 23333322
  14. Nebert DW, Wikvall K, Miller WL (2013). Human cytochromes P450 in health and disease. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B — PubMed PMID: 23297354
  15. Omura T, Sato R (1964). The carbon monoxide-binding pigment of liver microsomes. I. Evidence for its hemoprotein nature. Journal of Biological Chemistry — PubMed PMID: 14209971
  16. Jancova P, Anzenbacher P, Anzenbacherova E (2010). Phase II drug metabolizing enzymes. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of Palacky University Olomouc — PubMed PMID: 20668491
  17. McGill MR, Jaeschke H (2013). Metabolism and disposition of acetaminophen: recent advances in relation to hepatotoxicity and diagnosis. Pharmaceutical Research — PubMed PMID: 23462933
  18. Niemi M, Backman JT, Fromm MF, et al. (2003). Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin: clinical relevance. Clinical Pharmacokinetics — PubMed PMID: 12882588
  19. Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, DeVane CL, et al. (2003). Effect of St John's wort on drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. JAMA — PubMed PMID: 13129991
  20. Bailey DG, Dresser G, Arnold JM (2013). Grapefruit–medication interactions: forbidden fruit or avoidable consequences? CMAJ — PubMed PMID: 23184849
  21. Paine MF, Widmer WW, Hart HL, et al. (2006). A furanocoumarin-free grapefruit juice establishes furanocoumarins as the mediators of the grapefruit juice-felodipine interaction. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition — PubMed PMID: 16685052
  22. Lee AJ, Maddix DS (2001). Rhabdomyolysis secondary to a drug interaction between simvastatin and clarithromycin. Annals of Pharmacotherapy — PubMed PMID: 11197581
  23. Kroon LA (2007). Drug interactions with smoking. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy — PubMed PMID: 17823102
  24. Zevin S, Benowitz NL (1999). Drug interactions with tobacco smoking: an update. Clinical Pharmacokinetics — PubMed PMID: 10427467
  25. Sherman EM, Steinberg JG (2011). Heat-stable ritonavir tablets: a new formulation of a pharmacokinetic enhancer for HIV. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy — PubMed PMID: 21142696
  26. García-Closas M, Malats N, Silverman D, et al. (2005). NAT2 slow acetylation, GSTM1 null genotype, and risk of bladder cancer: results from the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study and meta-analyses. Lancet — PubMed PMID: 16112301
  27. Hein DW, Doll MA, Fretland AJ, et al. (2000). Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention — PubMed PMID: 10667461
  28. Eadon MT, Hein DW, Andersen MA, et al. (2025). Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for NAT2 genotype and hydralazine therapy. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics — PubMed PMID: 40974042
  29. Garte S, Gaspari L, Alexandrie AK, et al. (2001). Metabolic gene polymorphism frequencies in control populations. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention — PubMed PMID: 11751440
  30. Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP, et al. (2010). Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. JAMA — PubMed PMID: 20978260
  31. Lachman HM, Papolos DF, Saito T, et al. (1996). Human catechol-O-methyltransferase pharmacogenetics: description of a functional polymorphism and its potential application to neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacogenetics — PubMed PMID: 8807664
  32. Bosma PJ, Chowdhury JR, Bakker C, et al. (1995). The genetic basis of the reduced expression of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 in Gilbert's syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine — PubMed PMID: 7565971
  33. Ramchandani RP, Wang Y, Booth BP, et al. (2007). The role of SN-38 exposure, UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, and baseline bilirubin level in predicting severe irinotecan toxicity. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology — PubMed PMID: 17192505
  34. Lu SC (2013). Glutathione synthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta — PubMed PMID: 22995213
  35. Seeff LB, Cuccherini BA, Zimmerman HJ, et al. (1986). Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in alcoholics: a therapeutic misadventure. Annals of Internal Medicine — PubMed PMID: 3511825
  36. Badenhorst CP, van der Sluis R, Erasmus E, van Dijk AA (2013). Glycine conjugation: importance in metabolism, the role of glycine N-acyltransferase, and factors that influence interindividual variation. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology — PubMed PMID: 23650932
  37. Badenhorst CP, Erasmus E, van der Sluis R, et al. (2014). A new perspective on the importance of glycine conjugation in the metabolism of aromatic acids. Drug Metabolism Reviews — PubMed PMID: 24754494
  38. Kensler TW, Wakabayashi N, Biswal S (2007). Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology — PubMed PMID: 16968214
  39. Brady JF, Ishizaki H, Fukuto JM, et al. (1991). Inhibition of cytochrome P-450 2E1 by diallyl sulfide and its metabolites. Chemical Research in Toxicology — PubMed PMID: 1807447
  40. Nishinaka T, Ichijo Y, Ito M, et al. (2007). Curcumin activates human glutathione S-transferase P1 expression through antioxidant response element. Toxicology Letters — PubMed PMID: 17449203
  41. Susan M, Rao MN (1992). Induction of glutathione S-transferase activity by curcumin in mice. Arzneimittelforschung — PubMed PMID: 1418063
  42. Akakpo JY, Ramachandran A, Curry SC, et al. (2022). Comparing N-acetylcysteine and 4-methylpyrazole as antidotes for acetaminophen overdose. Archives of Toxicology — PubMed PMID: 34978586
  43. Humphreys BD, Forman JP, Zandi-Nejad K, et al. (2005). Acetaminophen-induced anion gap metabolic acidosis and 5-oxoprolinuria (pyroglutamic aciduria) acquired in hospital. American Journal of Kidney Diseases — PubMed PMID: 15983968
  44. Lee DH, Blomhoff R, Jacobs DR Jr (2004). Is serum gamma glutamyltransferase a marker of oxidative stress? Free Radical Research — PubMed PMID: 15346644
  45. Ambrosone CB, Zirpoli GR, Hutson AD, et al. (2020). Dietary supplement use during chemotherapy and survival outcomes of patients with breast cancer enrolled in a cooperative group clinical trial (SWOG S0221). Journal of Clinical Oncology — PubMed PMID: 31855498

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents