⚠ Evidence warning: Clinical trials or other evidence do not support the claims that manuka honey clears acne, reduces surgical scars, eases rosacea and psoriasis, and spares steroids in eczema. This page keeps it as a report of what people, websites or other media say.

Manuka Honey for Skin Conditions and Acne

Skin Conditions and Acne — scientific infographic poster

Beyond formal wound-care indications, manuka honey is used topically for inflammatory and infectious skin conditions. A 2017 open-label pilot study (Alangari) reported improvement on a lesion score in atopic dermatitis with manuka honey applied overnight under gauze. Topical manuka has been investigated for acne vulgaris as adjunctive antibacterial-and-anti-inflammatory therapy targeting Cutibacterium acnes. Practitioners apply it to post-surgical scars to limit hypertrophic scar formation and pigmentation, though two randomized trials of manuka found no difference on scar scales. Traditional New Zealand and Australian use of the manuka plant for skin complaints predates European contact; honey use came after European honeybees reached New Zealand in 1839. Practitioners describe the combined antibacterial-osmotic-low-pH-anti-inflammatory mechanism as making manuka honey one of the most versatile non-prescription topical agents for inflammatory dermatology. This deep-dive walks through atopic dermatitis trials, acne applications, surgical scar treatment, rosacea, traditional use, application techniques, and the practical limitations.


Table of Contents

  1. Traditional New Zealand & Australian Skin Use
  2. Mechanism on Inflamed and Infected Skin
  3. Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
  4. Alangari 2017 — Split-Side Eczema Pilot Study
  5. Acne Vulgaris
  6. Post-Surgical Scar Treatment
  7. Rosacea and Inflammatory Facial Conditions
  8. Herpes Simplex (Cold Sores)
  9. Psoriasis — Limited Evidence
  10. Application Practices (Overnight Occlusive vs Rinse-Off)
  11. Cautions and Limitations
  12. Key Research Papers
  13. Connections
  14. Featured Videos

Traditional New Zealand & Australian Skin Use

The Māori traditional pharmacopeia included mānuka (Leptospermum scoparium) for a range of skin and wound conditions. The leaves were boiled to produce decoctions used as wound washes and as compresses for inflamed skin. The bark was used for skin sores and as an antiseptic for wounds. The seeds and seed capsules were chewed and applied topically for boils. These pre-honey applications of the plant itself were focused on the volatile-oil and tannin content of Leptospermum, distinct from the methylglyoxal (MGO) mechanism that emerged later with honey production.

The closely related Australian tea-tree species (Melaleuca alternifolia) and the broader Leptospermum genus (including manuka in Australia) have a parallel Aboriginal Australian medicinal tradition, also focused on volatile-oil-rich topical applications for skin complaints. The shared family of antimicrobial volatile oils across these related Australasian myrtaceous species made them the regional first-line topical antiseptics for centuries.

The transition from plant decoctions and topical leaf applications to honey-based applications followed the introduction of European honeybees to New Zealand in 1839. By the late 19th century, both indigenous Māori healers and European settlers were using manuka honey topically for the same skin and wound applications previously addressed by leaf and bark preparations. The traditional knowledge essentially identified the right plant for these applications a century before the methylglyoxal mechanism was characterized.

Back to Table of Contents

Mechanism on Inflamed and Infected Skin

Manuka honey's proposed topical action on inflamed skin combines several mechanisms. Most of this list comes from laboratory work and from wound care, not from measurements on inflamed human skin:

The combined mechanism is the reason practitioners give for using manuka honey across such a wide range of skin conditions — it is not a specific antibiotic targeting one pathogen, nor a specific anti-inflammatory targeting one cytokine, but a multi-action topical agent that addresses several of the dysfunctional pathways in inflammatory skin disease simultaneously.

Back to Table of Contents

Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)

Atopic dermatitis (AD, eczema) affects approximately 10-20% of children and 2-10% of adults globally. The disease is characterized by impaired skin barrier function (genetic and acquired), type 2 helper T cell (Th2)-skewed adaptive immunity (elevated interleukins IL-4, IL-13 and IL-31), and abnormal skin microbiome dominated by Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus colonizes the skin of 70-90% of people with AD against about 5% of the normal population, by the Alangari paper's account; a pooling of 26 studies in children found 55.0% on eczematous skin (38.3-71.7) and 23.3% on non-lesional skin. It produces toxins (superantigens, alpha-toxin) that exacerbate the inflammatory cascade. Approaches used against S. aureus colonization include dilute bleach baths, mupirocin, and topical antiseptics, but a 2019 Cochrane review of 41 studies states: “There is no standard intervention to reduce S. aureus burden in eczema.” It found “insufficient evidence on the effects of anti-staphylococcal treatments,” and reports that bleach baths may make no difference compared with placebo.

Manuka honey's proposed antibacterial (S. aureus) and anti-inflammatory actions make it a mechanistically attractive intervention for AD. The Alangari et al. (2017) split-side pilot study (discussed in detail below) reported improvement on a lesion score with topical manuka in adults with AD.

A small randomized trial points the other way, for a different honey. Fingleton and colleagues (2014) treated matched lesions in 15 adults with kanuka honey on one side and aqueous cream on the other, nightly for 2 weeks. A blinded assessor found no difference in lesion score (-0.1, 95% confidence interval -1.5 to 1.4), and itch scores were similar. One participant reported more itch with honey.

Practitioner practice for AD, with no trial behind this schedule: clean medical-grade manuka honey (10+ to 18+ on a manuka grading scale for antibacterial activity) applied as a thin film to lesional skin overnight under occlusive wet-wrap dressing, followed by a morning rinse with lukewarm water and no soap, which practitioners say strips the natural skin barrier. It is repeated nightly for 7-14 days, then 2-3 times per week for maintenance. Practitioners say the wet-wrap occlusion maintains the honey-skin contact and amplifies the penetration of MGO and polyphenols into the epidermis. The one manuka study used gauze and tape for 7 nights.

For severe or recalcitrant AD, manuka honey is an adjunct to standard care (topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, dupilumab) rather than a replacement. Practitioners make their strongest case for manuka in AD as a steroid-sparing maintenance therapy for people who cycle between flares and corticosteroid courses, to reduce cumulative steroid exposure; no manuka trial has tested this.

See our Eczema page for the broader management approach.

Back to Table of Contents

Alangari 2017 — Split-Side Eczema Pilot Study

Alangari et al. (2017) in Immunity, Inflammation and Disease conducted a proof-of-concept, open-label pilot study of topical manuka honey in adults with bilateral atopic dermatitis lesions. It was not randomized: where the two sides differed, the slightly more severe site received the honey, covered with gauze and tape overnight for 7 nights, and the other site was left untreated, with moisturizers allowed on both. Sixteen people were recruited, two withdrew within two days for worsening symptoms, and 14 completed it. The measure was the Three Item Severity score (0-9). Results:

The split-side comparison limits differences between people, but the study was small, unblinded and not randomized. Its authors note that the score is validated yet not the gold standard for AD, and that the results need “randomized and controlled clinical trials.” What is not known: whether the effect holds under blinding, and how long it lasts. A one-year telephone follow-up gave only anecdotes: three people reported overall improvement without using honey.

An earlier, partly controlled study (Al-Waili 2003) tested a mixture of honey, beeswax and olive oil, not manuka: 8 of 10 people with dermatitis showed significant improvement after 2 weeks.

Back to Table of Contents

Acne Vulgaris

Acne vulgaris affects approximately 85% of adolescents and an estimated 50% of adults at some point in life. The pathogenesis is multifactorial: excess sebum production from sebaceous glands under androgen stimulation, follicular hyperkeratosis blocking the follicular opening, colonization by Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) in the obstructed follicle, and resulting inflammation that produces the visible papules, pustules, and nodules.

Topical manuka honey is proposed to address two of these mechanisms: the C. acnes colonization (antibacterial action of MGO) and the inflammation (anti-inflammatory polyphenols and cytokine reduction). It does not directly address sebum production or follicular keratinization — for those, conventional acne therapies (topical retinoids, isotretinoin, hormonal therapy in women) remain the established interventions.

The case made for manuka honey in acne is therefore as an adjunctive antibacterial-and-anti-inflammatory agent. No acne trial of manuka was found. The one controlled honey trial in acne was negative: in 136 people aged 16-40, adding 90% kanuka honey to antibacterial soap for 12 weeks gave a 2-point improvement in 4 of 53 against 1 of 53 with soap alone (p=0.17). In the laboratory, honey stopped acne bacteria at a 50% concentration (Julianti 2017). Practices people and practitioners describe:

The advantage practitioners claim for manuka over conventional topical antibiotics (clindamycin gel, erythromycin gel) concerns resistance — topical antibiotic resistance in C. acnes has reached approximately 50% globally and is reducing the effectiveness of long-term topical antibiotic acne therapy. Laboratory work on honey resistance is mixed, and none tested C. acnes or long-term skin use. Cooper 2010 found reduced susceptibility during stepwise training that was not permanent, with no resistant mutants, and judged the risk low “if high concentrations are maintained clinically.” Bischofberger 2021 found small honey resistance in E. coli (at most twofold) for 2 of 4 honey products, through mutations in genes that detoxify methylglyoxal. Mokhtar 2020 found that repeated low-dose exposure to a manuka wound gel changed antibiotic sensitivity and raised virulence in 4 of 8 bacteria.

The limitation of manuka honey in acne is that it does not address the follicular hyperkeratinization that drives comedone (whitehead/blackhead) formation. For comedonal-predominant acne, topical retinoids remain superior. For inflammatory-predominant (papulopustular) acne, practitioners describe manuka honey as a monotherapy or adjunct.

See our Acne page for the broader management context.

Back to Table of Contents

Post-Surgical Scar Treatment

Post-surgical and post-traumatic scars vary enormously in cosmetic outcome based on healing dynamics. The key determinants are: tension across the wound (high tension → widened scars and stretch marks), inflammation during healing (excess inflammation → hypertrophic scarring and keloid formation), pigmentation (post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in darker skin types), and time (scars naturally remodel for 6-12 months post-injury). Conventional scar-prevention modalities include silicone sheeting, pressure dressings, topical onion-extract gels, corticosteroid injections (for keloids), and laser therapy.

Manuka honey has been used as a topical scar-prevention agent following its widespread acceptance in primary wound care. The proposed mechanism for scar benefit overlaps with the anti-inflammatory and barrier-repair actions:

Practitioners describe applying medical-grade manuka honey to closed incisions, including after cesarean section, thyroidectomy and abdominal surgery, to limit scar thickening. Randomized trials of manuka itself found no scar benefit on validated scales. In eyelid surgery (55 randomized, 46 analysed), scar scales showed no difference at 4 months, though patients reported less scar pain on the honey side (0.48 against 1.9, p=0.005). After thyroidectomy (21 completed), there was no difference at 8 weeks. No manuka study of cesarean scars was found; a 2024 meta-analysis of honey of any type on obstetric wounds (5 trials, 353 women) found no difference in final wound healing (mean difference -0.34, 95% confidence interval -1.13 to 0.44) and less pain.

Practitioner routine, with no trial behind it: starting at 2-3 weeks post-op (after sutures are removed and the wound has fully closed), a thin film of grade 12+ manuka honey on the scar twice daily, covered with a thin silicone sheet or breathable bandage, for 4-12 weeks. For established hypertrophic scars or keloids, manuka honey is less effective and conventional intervention (intralesional corticosteroid, cryotherapy, surgical revision) may be required.

Back to Table of Contents

Rosacea and Inflammatory Facial Conditions

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory facial dermatosis characterized by central facial erythema, telangiectasia, papules, pustules, and (in some patients) phymatous changes. The pathophysiology involves cathelicidin LL-37 dysregulation, kallikrein-5 hyperactivity, neurovascular dysregulation, and altered skin microbiome including Demodex folliculorum overgrowth. Conventional treatment includes topical metronidazole, ivermectin, azelaic acid, brimonidine, and oral doxycycline.

Topical manuka honey for rosacea has limited formal trial evidence but a growing case-report and patient-reported literature. The mechanism would be the anti-inflammatory and antibacterial action, potentially reducing the bacterial component of inflammatory papulopustular rosacea. The osmotic action could reduce facial edema in erythematotelangiectatic rosacea, though this effect is short-lived.

The closest trial is of a different honey. In 138 adults, 90% kanuka honey with glycerine was tested against a control cream for 8 weeks: 24 of 68 improved by 2 points or more on a severity score, against 12 of 69 (relative risk 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.11-3.72). Manuka was not tested.

Practitioner routine: grade 12+ manuka honey applied as a thin film to affected facial areas at bedtime, left overnight, gently rinsed off in the morning, 3-4 nights per week at first and less often if irritation develops, alongside conventional rosacea therapy and not in place of it.

Limitations: rosacea is highly variable in response to topical therapies in general, and what helps one patient frequently does nothing for another. Practitioners describe manuka honey for mild-to-moderate papulopustular rosacea; for moderate-to-severe disease the concern is delay of conventional therapy.

Back to Table of Contents

Herpes Simplex (Cold Sores)

The strongest evidence for honey in herpes simplex labialis (cold sores, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) facial recurrences) comes from kanuka honey rather than manuka. Kanuka (Kunzea ericoides) is a closely related New Zealand myrtaceous species producing honey with distinct chemical profile — lacking the high MGO of manuka but containing other antimicrobial compounds including arabinogalactan proteins.

Semprini et al. (2019) in BMJ Open conducted a head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a 90% kanuka honey cream versus topical aciclovir (acyclovir cream) in 952 people aged 16 and over with herpes labialis, both applied five times daily. Results:

The authors found “no evidence of a difference in efficacy.” It was an open-label superiority trial with no non-inferiority margin set for formal testing, though the authors consider the intervals consistent with non-inferiority, and it was funded by the honey's maker. An early pilot explains why it was run: in 16 adults, honey had beaten acyclovir on healing time (Al-Waili 2004), a result not reproduced in 952 people. Manuka honey has not been formally tested at this scale for HSV-1, but smaller in-vitro studies suggest similar antiviral activity. The trial result applies to the kanuka cream, not to manuka.

Practitioner routine: a dab of grade 12+ manuka honey (or kanuka honey product) applied to the prodromal tingle as soon as symptoms begin, reapplied every 2-3 hours during waking hours for the first 3-4 days, and as desired during scab formation and resolution. Worsening redness, purulent discharge or an expanding lesion are signs of bacterial superinfection.

Back to Table of Contents

Psoriasis — Limited Evidence

Psoriasis is mechanistically distinct from atopic dermatitis — it is a T helper 17 and 22 (Th17/Th22)-driven hyperproliferative dermatosis rather than the Th2-driven barrier-impairment disease of AD. The role of skin microbiome (and therefore antibacterial therapy) in psoriasis is less established. Conventional first-line therapy is topical corticosteroids and Vitamin D analogs (calcipotriol); moderate-to-severe disease is treated with phototherapy or biologics targeting IL-17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab) or IL-23 (guselkumab, risankizumab).

Topical manuka honey for psoriasis has minimal formal trial evidence. Small case reports describe modest benefit for plaque psoriasis with overnight occlusive application, but no controlled trial of manuka was found. Trials of other honey exist: Fingleton 2014 randomized matched lesions in 15 adults to kanuka honey or aqueous cream, with no significant difference after two weeks, and in Al-Waili 2003, 5 of 8 people responded to a honey, beeswax and olive oil mixture. The mechanistic argument is weaker than for atopic dermatitis because the bacterial colonization that manuka would address is not a primary pathogenic driver in psoriasis the way S. aureus is in AD.

For inverse psoriasis (intertriginous areas with secondary bacterial or candidal colonization), the antibacterial and antifungal activity of manuka may be more relevant. Small open-label experiences suggest benefit, but conventional therapy (low-potency topical steroid plus topical antifungal) remains first-line.

For scalp psoriasis with overlying seborrheic dermatitis, manuka honey shampoo or dilute (50% honey + 50% water) leave-in treatment for 30 minutes prior to rinsing has been described, though again without rigorous trial data. The study found on the scalp used a different routine and a different condition: 90% crude honey, not manuka, for 3 hours every other day in 30 people with seborrheic dermatitis, without a control group during treatment (Al-Waili 2001).

Back to Table of Contents

Application Practices (Overnight Occlusive vs Rinse-Off)

These are practitioner routines, not trial-tested schedules. The choice between overnight occlusive application versus shorter rinse-off application depends on the condition and the practical tolerability:

Practical notes from the same practice: rinsing is with lukewarm (not hot, not cold) water — hot water is said to dissolve honey too aggressively and remove it before therapeutic contact is complete; cold water doesn't dissolve well and leaves sticky residue. Soap or detergent face wash straight after honey treatment is said to strip the residual honey film and the natural skin barrier together. A gentle splash of lukewarm water is described as sufficient.

Back to Table of Contents

Cautions and Limitations

Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

  1. Alangari AA, Morris K, Lwaleed BA, Lau L, Jones K, Cooper R, Jenkins R (2017). Honey is potentially effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: clinical and mechanistic studies. Immun Inflamm Dis, 5(2): 190-199. — PubMed PMID: 28474502
  2. Semprini A et al. (2019). Kanuka honey versus aciclovir for the topical treatment of herpes simplex labialis: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 9(5): e026201. — PubMed PMID: 31092654
  3. Al-Waili NS (2003). Topical application of natural honey, beeswax and olive oil mixture for atopic dermatitis or psoriasis: partially controlled, single-blinded study. Complement Ther Med, 11(4): 226-34. — PubMed PMID: 15022655
  4. Burlando B, Cornara L (2013). Honey in dermatology and skin care: a review. J Cosmet Dermatol, 12(4): 306-13. — PubMed PMID: 24305429
  5. McLoone P, Warnock M, Fyfe L (2016). Honey: a realistic antimicrobial for disorders of the skin. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 49(2): 161-7. — PubMed PMID: 25732699
  6. Maddocks SE, Lopez MS, Rowlands RS, Cooper RA (2012). Manuka honey inhibits the development of Streptococcus pyogenes biofilms and causes reduced expression of two fibronectin binding proteins. Microbiology, 158(Pt 3): 781-790. — PubMed PMID: 22294681
  7. Sindi A et al. (2019). Anti-biofilm effects and characterisation of the hydrogen peroxide activity of a range of Western Australian honeys compared to Manuka and multifloral honeys. Sci Rep. — PubMed PMID: 31776432
  8. Eteraf-Oskouei T, Najafi M (2013). Traditional and modern uses of natural honey in human diseases: a review. Iran J Basic Med Sci, 16(6): 731-42. — PubMed PMID: 23997898
  9. Israili ZH (2014). Antimicrobial properties of honey. Am J Ther, 21(4): 304-23. — PubMed PMID: 23782759
  10. Julianti E, Rajah KK, Fidrianny I (2017). Antibacterial activity of ethanolic extract of cinnamon bark, honey, and their combination effects against acne-causing bacteria. Sci Pharm, 85(2): 19. — PubMed PMID: 28398231
  11. Visavadia BG, Honeysett J, Danford MH (2008). Manuka honey dressing: an effective treatment for chronic wound infections. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 46(1): 55-6. — PubMed PMID: 17113690
  12. Saikaly SK, Khachemoune A (2017). Honey and wound healing: an update. Am J Clin Dermatol, 18(2): 237-251. — PubMed PMID: 28063093
  13. Braithwaite I, Hunt A, Riley J, et al. (2015). Randomised controlled trial of topical kanuka honey for the treatment of rosacea. BMJ Open, 5(6): e007651. — PubMed PMID: 26109117
  14. Semprini A, Braithwaite I, Corin A, et al. (2016). Randomised controlled trial of topical kanuka honey for the treatment of acne. BMJ Open, 6(2): e009448. — PubMed PMID: 26832428
  15. Fingleton J, Helm C, Tofield C, Weatherall M, Beasley R (2014). A randomised controlled trial of topical Kanuka honey for the treatment of eczema. JRSM Open, 5(1): 2042533313509263. — PubMed PMID: 25057363
  16. Fingleton J, Sheahan D, Corin A, Weatherall M, Beasley R (2014). A randomised controlled trial of topical Kanuka honey for the treatment of psoriasis. JRSM Open, 5(3): 2042533313518913. — PubMed PMID: 25057377
  17. Malhotra R, Ziahosseini K, Poitelea C, Litwin A, Sagili S (2017). Effect of Manuka honey on eyelid wound healing: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg, 33(4): 268-272. — PubMed PMID: 27429228
  18. Thamboo A, Mulholland G, Matthews K, Ayoub N, Anderson D (2016). Objective and subjective scar aesthetics with topical Manuka honey post-thyroidectomy: a randomized control study. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2(4): 203-207. — PubMed PMID: 29204567
  19. Ferraz Barbosa B, de Moraes FCA, Araujo Alves da Silva B, et al. (2024). The use of honey for cicatrization and pain control of obstetric wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients, 16(2). — PubMed PMID: 38257078
  20. Cooper RA, Jenkins L, Henriques AF, Duggan RS, Burton NF (2010). Absence of bacterial resistance to medical-grade manuka honey. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 29(10): 1237-41. — PubMed PMID: 20549529
  21. Bischofberger AM, Pfrunder Cardozo KR, Baumgartner M, Hall AR (2021). Evolution of honey resistance in experimental populations of bacteria depends on the type of honey and has no major side effects for antibiotic susceptibility. Evol Appl, 14(5): 1314-1327. — PubMed PMID: 34025770
  22. Mokhtar JA, McBain AJ, Ledder RG, Binsuwaidan R, Rimmer V, Humphreys GJ (2020). Exposure to a manuka honey wound gel is associated with changes in bacterial virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility. Front Microbiol, 11: 2036. — PubMed PMID: 32973735
  23. Tonks AJ, Cooper RA, Jones KP, Blair S, Parton J, Tonks A (2003). Honey stimulates inflammatory cytokine production from monocytes. Cytokine, 21(5): 242-7. — PubMed PMID: 12824009
  24. Sangaphunchai P, Kritsanaviparkporn C, Treesirichod A (2023). Association between Staphylococcus aureus colonization and pediatric atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Dermatol, 68(6): 619-627. — PubMed PMID: 38371569
  25. George SM, Karanovic S, Harrison DA, et al. (2019). Interventions to reduce Staphylococcus aureus in the management of eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019(10). — PubMed PMID: 31684694
  26. Al-Waili NS (2001). Therapeutic and prophylactic effects of crude honey on chronic seborrheic dermatitis and dandruff. Eur J Med Res, 6(7): 306-8. — PubMed PMID: 11485891
  27. Al-Waili NS (2004). Topical honey application vs. acyclovir for the treatment of recurrent herpes simplex lesions. Med Sci Monit, 10(8): MT94-8. — PubMed PMID: 15278008

PubMed Topic Searches

  1. PubMed: Manuka honey + atopic dermatitis
  2. PubMed: Manuka honey + acne / C. acnes
  3. PubMed: Manuka honey + scar / hypertrophic
  4. PubMed: Manuka / kanuka + HSV / cold sores
  5. PubMed: Honey + rosacea / seborrheic
  6. PubMed: Manuka + S. aureus skin colonization

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents