Keratoconus

Table of Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Epidemiology
  3. Pathophysiology — Corneal Thinning and Ectasia
  4. Clinical Signs — Fleischer Ring, Vogt’s Striae, Munson’s Sign
  5. The Eye Rubbing Connection
  6. Diagnosis — Corneal Topography and Tomography
  7. Vision Correction: Glasses, Soft Lenses, RGP Lenses, Scleral Lenses
  8. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL) — Halting Progression
  9. INTACS Corneal Ring Segments
  10. Penetrating Keratoplasty and DALK for Advanced Keratoconus
  11. Key Research Papers
  12. Connections
  13. Featured Videos

Overview

Keratoconus is a progressive condition in which the cornea — the clear dome at the front of the eye that does most of the eye’s focusing work — gradually thins and bulges outward into a cone shape. The word comes from Greek: keras (horn or cornea) and konos (cone). This distorted, cone-shaped cornea scatters incoming light instead of focusing it cleanly onto the retina, producing blurry, distorted, and often double vision in the affected eye. Halos around lights and glare at night are common early complaints.

Keratoconus typically begins during the teenage years or early twenties. It may progress — sometimes rapidly, sometimes slowly — over a span of 10 to 20 years before stabilizing in the 30s or 40s. During the progressive phase, a person can go through eyeglass prescriptions every few months as the cornea continues to change. Eventually most cases stabilize, though in severe cases the cornea can develop acute ruptures in its inner membrane (corneal hydrops), causing sudden clouding and pain.

Prevalence is approximately 1 in 2,000 people in Western countries, though more recent studies using modern corneal mapping technology suggest the true rate may be as high as 1 in 375. Keratoconus affects all ethnicities but is more common and tends to be more severe in people of South Asian and Middle Eastern descent. With current treatments — particularly corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) — the outlook for preserving good functional vision has improved dramatically over the past two decades.

Back to Table of Contents

Epidemiology

Keratoconus is more common than once thought. Early estimates of 1 in 2,000 were based on clinical presentations; topography-based population studies put the number considerably higher. One large study in the Netherlands (Godefrooij et al., 2017) found an age-standardized incidence of 13.3 per 100,000 person-years. Some regional studies in Central India reported a prevalence approaching 1 in 67 in certain communities.

Age of onset: Most cases are diagnosed between ages 10 and 25. Progression is fastest in the teens and twenties, typically slowing significantly after age 30 and stabilizing by the mid-40s. Keratoconus diagnosed after age 40 is less likely to progress aggressively.

Laterality: Both eyes are affected in approximately 96% of cases, although the severity is almost always asymmetric — one eye is typically more advanced than the other. This asymmetry means early-stage disease in the second eye can be missed without careful examination.

Sex: Most studies show a roughly equal male-to-female ratio, with some reporting a slight male predominance.

Associated conditions: Several conditions are found at elevated rates in keratoconus patients:

Genetics: Approximately 10% of keratoconus cases are familial (first-degree relatives affected), suggesting an autosomal dominant pattern with variable penetrance. Multiple chromosomal loci have been implicated, including genes involved in collagen synthesis and regulation: LOX (lysyl oxidase), DOCK9, ZNF469, and VSX1. Genetic testing is not yet clinically routine, but screening first-degree relatives with corneal topography is appropriate when a family member is diagnosed.

Back to Table of Contents

Pathophysiology — Corneal Thinning and Ectasia

To understand keratoconus, it helps to understand the normal cornea. The cornea is about 0.5–0.6 mm thick and is composed of five distinct layers. The bulk of its thickness is made up of the stroma, a highly organized matrix of collagen fibrils arranged in parallel lamellae (sheets). This precise architecture gives the cornea both transparency and mechanical strength. The stroma’s collagen framework is what holds the cornea in its dome shape.

In keratoconus, this framework breaks down in a specific region of the cornea, usually the inferior (lower) paracentral area. The leading molecular hypotheses involve:

As the stroma in the affected zone thins, the remaining tissue cannot resist the normal intraocular pressure (IOP) that is always present inside the eye. The weakened area bows forward under this pressure, forming the characteristic cone. The overlying corneal epithelium compensates partially — it becomes thinner over the cone apex and thicker in surrounding areas — but this redistribution has limits.

The distorted corneal shape produces irregular astigmatism: unlike the smooth, predictable astigmatism that glasses can fully correct, the keratoconus cornea has complex, asymmetric irregularities that generate higher-order optical aberrations. Coma (a comet-like smearing of images) and trefoil are particularly prominent in keratoconus and account for the ghosting and distortion that patients describe even when standard refractive errors are corrected.

In the most severe cases, Descemet’s membrane (the deep inner layer of the cornea) can rupture, allowing aqueous humor from inside the eye to flood the stroma. This is acute corneal hydrops — a sudden painful episode of corneal clouding that, paradoxically, can sometimes reduce irregular astigmatism as the subsequent scar tissue forms a more regular surface.

Back to Table of Contents

Clinical Signs — Fleischer Ring, Vogt’s Striae, and Munson’s Sign

An experienced ophthalmologist examining the eye with a slit lamp can often diagnose keratoconus from specific physical signs that accumulate as the disease progresses. Three classic signs are taught in every ophthalmology training program:

Fleischer Ring

A ring of brownish-golden discoloration visible at or near the base of the corneal cone, caused by deposits of iron (as hemosiderin) in the deep epithelium. It is seen in approximately 50% of keratoconus cases and is easier to spot using a cobalt-blue filter on the slit lamp. The ring is thought to arise because iron from the tear film accumulates in the areas of epithelial thickening that surround the cone’s apex.

Vogt’s Striae

Fine, vertical stress lines visible in the deep stroma and Bowman’s layer of the cornea. They form because the stroma is under mechanical tension as the cone steepens. A diagnostically useful test: if you apply gentle pressure on the eyelid, Vogt’s striae will temporarily disappear (unlike blood vessel patterns, which do not). They reappear when pressure is released.

Munson’s Sign

A late, easily visible sign: when the patient looks downward, the bulging cone pushes the lower eyelid forward, creating a characteristic V-shape or tent-like indentation of the lower lid. It is most dramatic in advanced, long-standing cases. By the time Munson’s sign is obvious, the patient has usually already experienced years of visual symptoms.

Additional Signs

Back to Table of Contents

The Eye Rubbing Connection

Of all the known risk factors for keratoconus, chronic eye rubbing is the most important modifiable one. Multiple lines of evidence link vigorous eye rubbing to both the development and the progression of keratoconus:

How rubbing damages the cornea: The mechanical trauma is only part of the story. Eye rubbing also triggers the release of inflammatory cytokines — particularly interleukin-1 (IL-1) — from the epithelial cells that are compressed and sheared. IL-1 then activates stromal keratocytes to upregulate matrix metalloproteinases (the enzymes that degrade collagen). In other words, every vigorous rub is a small burst of collagen-degrading enzyme activity in the stroma.

The atopy connection: The reason keratoconus is so strongly associated with atopic diseases (hay fever, eczema, asthma) is almost certainly through this pathway. Atopic eye disease causes chronic itching, which drives chronic rubbing. Managing the itch is therefore not just a comfort measure — it is disease-modifying treatment for keratoconus:

Practical counseling: Every keratoconus patient should receive explicit, emphatic instruction to stop rubbing their eyes — not “try to rub less” but to stop entirely. If the eye itches, the correct response is a cold compress, antihistamine drops, or artificial tears — never rubbing. This instruction should be repeated at every visit. Stopping eye rubbing is one of the few things a patient can actively do to influence their disease course, and its importance cannot be overstated.

Back to Table of Contents

Diagnosis — Corneal Topography and Tomography

Slit-lamp examination alone misses early keratoconus. The physical signs described above (Fleischer ring, Vogt’s striae) only appear once disease is moderately advanced. Modern keratoconus diagnosis relies on corneal imaging technology to detect the subtle shape and thickness changes that precede clinical signs by years.

Corneal Topography

Topography maps the curvature of the front surface of the cornea by analyzing the reflection of a series of rings (Placido disc) off the tear film. In a normal cornea, the color-coded curvature map is symmetric and shows gentle steepening at the center. In keratoconus, topography reveals a characteristic pattern of inferior steepening — a focal area of increased curvature (shown as red or orange on the standard color scale) displaced below the corneal center, often with an asymmetric bowtie pattern and a skewed radial axis.

Topography can detect keratoconus before any symptoms appear and before the slit-lamp shows changes. This is critical for two reasons: (1) early CXL works better, and (2) LASIK in an eye with even subclinical keratoconus is dangerous — removing stroma weakens the cornea further and can trigger rapid ectasia (post-LASIK ectasia).

Corneal Tomography (Scheimpflug Imaging)

Tomography goes further than topography by capturing the three-dimensional shape of the entire cornea — front surface, back surface, and pachymetry (thickness) at every point. The Pentacam (Oculus) using Scheimpflug camera technology is the clinical workhorse. It generates:

Key Diagnostic Indices

Why This Matters for LASIK Screening

One of the most important applications of keratoconus screening is pre-LASIK evaluation. Refractive surgeons must rule out forme fruste keratoconus in every LASIK candidate. Performing LASIK on an eye with subclinical keratoconus removes additional stroma from an already-weak cornea and frequently triggers rapid, severe post-LASIK ectasia — a potentially vision-devastating complication that requires the same treatments as advanced keratoconus. Modern Scheimpflug-based screening has dramatically reduced (though not eliminated) this complication.

Back to Table of Contents

Vision Correction: Glasses, Soft Lenses, RGP Lenses, Scleral Lenses

The optical goal in keratoconus management is to create a smooth, regular refracting surface in front of the irregular cornea. As the disease progresses, standard optical aids become insufficient, and the approach escalates through a hierarchy of options:

Spectacles (Eyeglasses)

In very early, mild keratoconus, glasses can provide adequate functional vision. They correct the regular components of astigmatism but cannot compensate for irregular astigmatism. As the cone steepens and higher-order aberrations accumulate, spectacle-corrected vision deteriorates — patients notice ghost images, distortion, and monocular diplopia (double vision in one eye) that glasses cannot eliminate. Most patients progress beyond useful spectacle correction within a few years of diagnosis.

Soft Contact Lenses

Soft toric lenses may help briefly in very early keratoconus, but the soft material drapes over the irregular surface rather than creating a new smooth one. They have limited benefit beyond spectacles for moderate disease. Some patients use them as an “in between” option while adapting to rigid lens wear.

Rigid Gas-Permeable (RGP) Lenses

RGP lenses are the traditional workhorse for moderate keratoconus. Because they are rigid, they maintain their own shape over the irregular cornea. The space between the back surface of the lens and the irregular corneal front surface fills with a smooth tear film layer, which acts as an optical fluid that neutralizes most of the cornea’s irregular astigmatism. This allows the rigid lens’s smooth front surface to do the focusing. RGP lenses can restore excellent visual acuity in moderate keratoconus. The trade-offs are comfort (rigid lenses require an adaptation period of several weeks) and fitting complexity (keratoconus eyes are more difficult to fit than normal eyes).

Hybrid Lenses

Hybrid lenses combine a rigid optical center with a soft skirt that extends onto the sclera. The rigid center provides the optical correction of an RGP, while the soft skirt improves comfort and centration. They are a useful middle ground for patients who cannot tolerate pure rigid lenses.

Scleral Lenses

Scleral lenses are the current gold standard for moderate-to-advanced keratoconus. These large-diameter rigid lenses (typically 16–22 mm diameter) vault completely over the entire cornea and rest on the sclera (the white of the eye). The space beneath the lens is filled with sterile saline solution before insertion, creating a liquid reservoir. This reservoir completely neutralizes even extreme corneal irregularity, and patients often achieve their best-ever corrected visual acuity with sclerals. Comfort is typically superior to smaller rigid lenses because the lens rests on the insensitive sclera rather than the sensitive cornea. Scleral lenses are also highly effective after corneal transplants, when residual astigmatism can still be significant.

Piggyback System

For patients who need the optical power of an RGP lens but cannot tolerate its direct corneal contact, a soft lens is placed on the eye first (the “cushion”) and then an RGP lens is placed on top of the soft lens. This significantly improves comfort at the cost of some optical quality and increased care complexity.

Contact lens fitting in keratoconus is a specialty skill. Most patients benefit from referral to a corneal specialist or an optometrist with specific expertise in specialty contact lens fitting for irregular corneas.

Back to Table of Contents

Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL) — Halting Progression

Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is the only treatment proven to halt the progression of keratoconus. It does not restore lost corneal tissue, correct existing irregular astigmatism, or eliminate the need for contact lenses — but it can prevent the cornea from continuing to thin and steepen, preserving the patient’s residual vision and reducing the likelihood of eventually needing a corneal transplant.

How CXL Works

CXL exploits the photochemical interaction between riboflavin (vitamin B2) and UV-A light. Riboflavin, when activated by UV-A at a wavelength of 370 nanometers, generates reactive oxygen species that catalyze the formation of new covalent bonds between adjacent collagen fibril chains in the stroma. These extra cross-links mechanically stiffen the corneal tissue, increasing its resistance to the forces that drive ectatic progression. The treatment essentially replicates — and amplifies — the natural cross-linking that occurs with age and UV exposure (which is why keratoconus naturally stabilizes in older adults).

The Dresden Protocol (Standard Epi-Off CXL)

The original, FDA-approved approach developed by Wollensak, Spoerl, and Seiler in Dresden, Germany (published 2003) involves:

  1. Removal of the central corneal epithelium (the thin outer cell layer) with a blunt spatula or alcohol, to allow riboflavin to penetrate into the stroma
  2. Application of riboflavin 0.1% drops to the cornea every 3 minutes for 30 minutes to saturate the stroma
  3. UV-A irradiation at 3 mW/cm² for 30 minutes (total energy: 5.4 J/cm²)
  4. A bandage contact lens for 3–5 days while the epithelium heals

The 2003 Wollensak et al. paper reported halting of progression in all treated eyes and modest flattening of the cone in most. These results have been replicated in hundreds of subsequent studies worldwide.

Transepithelial (Epi-On) CXL

A newer variant that leaves the epithelium intact, relying on modified riboflavin formulations (containing EDTA and trometamol to enhance epithelial penetration) and sometimes pulsed UV delivery. Epi-on CXL has a faster, less painful recovery since the epithelial barrier is not disrupted. However, clinical evidence suggests its efficacy may be somewhat lower than the standard epi-off technique, and it is not yet FDA approved in the same form as the Dresden protocol.

Indications and Contraindications

The primary indication is documented progression: an increase in Kmax of 1.0 D or more, or a decrease in thinnest corneal thickness of 10 µm or more over 6–12 months, confirmed on repeat tomography. CXL is generally not performed on stable keratoconus.

Key contraindications:

Recovery and Results

After epi-off CXL, patients experience 3–5 days of significant eye pain and photophobia while the epithelium heals. Vision is blurred for weeks to months as sub-surface stromal haze develops (keratocytes in the anterior stroma die from the UV-A exposure and must be repopulated from surrounding tissue). Most patients see return to pre-CXL vision by 3–6 months, with final results assessed at 12 months. The goal is stabilization, not improvement; many patients notice modest flattening and some improvement in topographic regularity over the following 1–2 years, but should not expect dramatic vision improvement from CXL alone.

CXL is FDA approved in the United States using the Photrexa Viscous (riboflavin) + KXL UV system (approved 2016). It is now standard of care for progressive keratoconus in children and young adults worldwide.

Back to Table of Contents

INTACS Corneal Ring Segments

INTACS (intrastromal corneal ring segments) are small, crescent-shaped arc segments made of PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate, the same material as many intraocular lenses) that are surgically implanted within the corneal stroma. They were originally developed for low myopia correction in the 1990s but found a more enduring application in keratoconus, for which they received FDA approval in 2004.

How They Work

The ring segments are placed in channels created either mechanically (with a specialized diamond knife) or with a femtosecond laser (which allows more precise, reproducible channel creation) at roughly two-thirds of the corneal depth in the mid-peripheral stroma. By adding thickness in the periphery, INTACS flatten the central cone and redistribute corneal curvature more evenly. The net effect is a reduction in irregular astigmatism, an improvement in topographic regularity, and — for many patients — an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity and contact lens tolerance.

What INTACS Can and Cannot Do

INTACS can:

INTACS cannot:

Combining INTACS with CXL

Many surgeons now combine INTACS placement with CXL in the same procedure or as a planned sequence. The rationale: INTACS improve corneal regularity, then CXL stabilizes the improved shape. This combined approach has shown promising results in several prospective studies.

Reversibility and Safety

One advantage of INTACS is reversibility — they can be removed or exchanged if results are unsatisfactory or if complications arise. Potential complications include segment migration, interface haze, infection, and induced astigmatism, but the serious complication rate is low in experienced hands.

Back to Table of Contents

Penetrating Keratoplasty and DALK for Advanced Keratoconus

Despite the advances in CXL, scleral lenses, and INTACS, a subset of keratoconus patients — those with severe thinning, dense apical scarring, or corneas too irregular for adequate contact lens correction — will ultimately require a corneal transplant. Keratoconus is one of the leading indications for corneal transplantation in developed countries.

Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK/PKP)

Full-thickness corneal transplantation has been performed for over a century and remains the gold standard for advanced keratoconus with significant scarring. The diseased central cornea (typically 7.5–8.5 mm in diameter) is excised with a trephine and replaced with a donor button of similar size, secured with interrupted or continuous sutures. Long-term graft survival in keratoconus is excellent — approximately 90% at 10 years, which is better than for most other corneal transplant indications because keratoconus does not involve endothelial disease. However, PK carries risks of:

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK)

DALK replaces only the anterior corneal tissue (epithelium, Bowman’s layer, and stroma) while preserving the patient’s own Descemet’s membrane and endothelium. Since the endothelium is the layer responsible for corneal rejection (via T-cell mediated immune attack on donor endothelial cells), DALK eliminates the risk of endothelial rejection — the most feared long-term complication of PK. This is particularly valuable in younger patients who face decades of graft survival requirements.

The most popular DALK technique is the big-bubble technique: a large-diameter air injection into the deep stroma creates a bubble that dissects the stroma from Descemet’s membrane, allowing the anterior lamellae to be removed en bloc. When successful, this leaves behind an intact, ultra-thin Descemet-only layer. The technique requires significant surgical skill and a degree of luck (the bubble does not always form), and DALK is therefore not universally available. Conversion to PK is required in about 5–20% of attempted DALKs when the big bubble cannot be achieved.

DALK is preferred over PK whenever possible in keratoconus without endothelial involvement — which is the case for the vast majority of keratoconus patients.

Vision After Transplant

An important point that patients must understand: corneal transplant corrects the structural problem but usually does not correct all optical irregularity. After suture removal and stabilization, the transplanted cornea is typically much more regular than the diseased keratoconus cornea but still more irregular than a normal eye. Most post-transplant keratoconus patients still require specialty contact lenses — particularly scleral lenses — to achieve their best visual acuity. The goal of transplant is to restore a cornea that can be corrected with contact lenses to functional vision; the expectation of glasses-only or bare-eye functional vision post-transplant is usually unrealistic in keratoconus.

Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

  1. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):620–627. PMID 12737958. The foundational CXL paper establishing the Dresden protocol; reported halting of progression in all 23 treated eyes with modest cone flattening.
  2. Raiskup F, Theuring A, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progressive keratoconus: ten-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(1):41–46. PubMed search: Raiskup crosslinking keratoconus 10 year. Landmark 10-year follow-up confirming durable efficacy of epi-off CXL.
  3. Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, Imhof SM, Wisse RP. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–172. PMID 27035607. Large population study reporting age-standardized incidence; supports higher prevalence estimates than older clinical series.
  4. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319. PMID 9892785. Comprehensive foundational review of keratoconus epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management; a standard reference for over two decades.
  5. Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Hooshmand E, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea. 2020;39(2):263–270. PubMed search: eye rubbing keratoconus risk factor. Systematic review quantifying the association between eye rubbing, atopy, and keratoconus prevalence.
  6. Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr. Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):401–406. PubMed search: Belin Ambrosio Scheimpflug keratoconus screening. Describes the BAD-D index and Scheimpflug-based tomographic criteria for detecting early and subclinical keratoconus.
  7. Downie LE, Lindsay RG. Contact lens management of keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98(4):299–311. PubMed search: scleral lens keratoconus visual outcomes. Practical guide to the full spectrum of contact lens options, including scleral lenses, for keratoconus management.
  8. Colin J, Cochener B, Savary G, Malet F. Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(8):1117–1122. PubMed search: INTACS keratoconus outcomes. Early report establishing INTACS as a viable surgical option for improving vision and corneal regularity in keratoconus.
  9. Tan DT, Dart JK, Holland EJ, Kinoshita S. Corneal transplantation. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1749–1761. PubMed search: DALK penetrating keratoplasty keratoconus comparison. Comprehensive review comparing DALK and PK outcomes for keratoconus, including rejection rates and visual results.
  10. Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2):267–275. PubMed search: keratoconus genetics LOX familial. Identifies keratoconus susceptibility and topographic risk factors for post-LASIK ectasia; critical for pre-surgical screening.
  11. Ferdi AC, Nguyen V, Gore DM, et al. Keratoconus natural progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11529 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(7):935–945. PubMed search: keratoconus atopy atopic disease eye rubbing. Large meta-analysis of keratoconus progression rates and the role of atopy and eye rubbing in disease course.
  12. Amsler M. Keratoconus klassiche oder degenerative Keratektasie. Bull Mem Soc Fr Ophtalmol. 1961;74:468–469. PubMed search: keratoconus history topography diagnosis. Historical classification of keratoconus subtypes; Amsler’s grading system remains influential in clinical practice.

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents