EGCG Safety and Liver Health

Safety and Liver — scientific infographic poster

The safety record of EGCG splits in two. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded in 2018 that catechins from traditionally brewed green tea are in general considered safe at the intakes reported in Europe, while clinical trials of food supplements supplying 800 mg or more of EGCG a day showed a statistically significant rise in serum transaminases, a sign of liver injury. Concentrated green tea extracts have been linked to liver injury ranging from raised liver enzymes to, in rare cases, acute liver failure, liver transplantation or death. The U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP), EFSA, the NIH LiverTox database and the U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network have all documented the problem, and since 2022 the European Union restricts EGCG from green tea extracts in foods. This page sets out what those bodies and studies report: how often the injury occurs, the role of dose and of an empty stomach, an inherited immune trait linked to it, and the warnings regulators require.


Table of Contents

  1. The Headline: Tea vs. Supplements
  2. How Common Is the Liver Injury?
  3. Why High-Dose EGCG Harms the Liver
  4. The Fasted-Stomach Problem
  5. EFSA 2018 and the EU 2022 Restriction
  6. USP and LiverTox: Cautionary Labeling
  7. Symptoms Named in Label Warnings
  8. Who the Research Raises Concerns For
  9. What Studies and Regulators Report About Dose and Timing
  10. Other Safety Considerations
  11. Key Research Papers
  12. External Resources
  13. Connections
  14. Featured Videos

The Headline: Tea vs. Supplements

The central distinction in EGCG safety is brewed green tea versus concentrated green tea extract (GTE) taken as a supplement.

The difference is largely one of dose and delivery. EFSA estimated mean EGCG intake from green tea infusions at 90–300 mg per day in European adults, with high consumers reaching up to about 866 mg per day, while food supplements containing green tea catechins supplied 5–1,000 mg of EGCG per day.

Back to Table of Contents

How Common Is the Liver Injury?

Green tea extract liver injury is generally described as idiosyncratic — it affects a small minority of users unpredictably rather than everyone above a given dose.

An inherited immune trait. In the same DILIN analysis, the immune-system gene variant HLA-B*35:01 was found in 72% of green tea cases, compared with 15% of liver-injury cases caused by other supplements, 12% of cases caused by conventional drugs, and 11% of population controls. The authors concluded that green tea-related liver injury is idiosyncratic and immune mediated, which helps explain why it occurs in some users and not in others taking similar amounts.

Back to Table of Contents

Why High-Dose EGCG Harms the Liver

The mechanism is not settled. Most of the direct evidence comes from mouse studies given very large bolus doses by stomach tube, and from the human genetic association above:

  1. Oxidative stress at high concentration (animal studies). As described on the Antioxidant & Cellular Health page, EGCG can act as a pro-oxidant at high concentrations. In mice, a single 1,500 mg/kg dose raised plasma ALT 138-fold and reduced survival by 85%, with hepatic necrosis and markers of oxidative stress such as a 5-fold rise in liver lipid peroxidation (Lambert and colleagues, 2010).
  2. Glutathione depletion and mitochondrial injury (animal studies). In mice given 750 mg/kg once daily for 3 days, reduced liver glutathione fell by 59% (James and colleagues, 2015). A 2018 mouse study linked bolus-dose EGCG liver injury to lower antioxidant enzyme levels and fewer liver mitochondria, and its authors proposed the mitochondria as a target.
  3. An immune (idiosyncratic) reaction in people. The HLA-B*35:01 association in DILIN patients points to an immune-mediated mechanism in susceptible individuals.

These strands do not behave the same way. EFSA described dose-dependent hepatotoxicity of EGCG from supplements, but also stated that the rare cases after green tea infusions are probably idiosyncratic, with no clear relation to dose, route or duration. Hu and colleagues identified internal dose of catechins — how much reaches the blood and liver, which depends on the dose and on whether it is taken with food — as a key determinant of whether liver injury occurs and how severe it is.

Back to Table of Contents

The Fasted-Stomach Problem

Taking concentrated EGCG on an empty stomach raises how much reaches the bloodstream. In a crossover trial of 30 healthy volunteers given a single dose of a decaffeinated green tea catechin mixture (400, 800 or 1,200 mg of EGCG), the average maximum plasma concentration of free EGCG was more than 3.5-fold higher when the dose was taken after an overnight fast than when it was taken with a light breakfast (Chow and colleagues, 2005). Mild, transient nausea was seen most often at the 1,200 mg dose and in the fasting condition. In an earlier 4-week trial, the area under the plasma EGCG curve rose by more than 60% when 800 mg was taken once daily, but not when 400 mg was taken twice daily (Chow and colleagues, 2003).

The 2005 study authors concluded that the fasting condition was expected to optimize the biological effects of tea catechins — the same reasoning behind taking extracts before eating to maximize absorption. Safety bodies have since connected that same condition with toxicity:

Both the USP label statement and the EU regulation described below include a warning against taking green tea extract on an empty stomach.

Back to Table of Contents

EFSA 2018 and the EU 2022 Restriction

In 2018 EFSA's Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food published a scientific opinion on the safety of green tea catechins. Its main findings:

EU Regulation 2022/2340. Acting on that opinion, the European Commission adopted Regulation (EU) 2022/2340 on 30 November 2022. It places green tea extracts containing EGCG in Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 (restricted substances): a daily portion of a food must contain less than 800 mg of EGCG. The label must state the EGCG content per portion and the maximum number of portions per day, warn against consuming 800 mg or more a day, and carry three warnings, quoted from the regulation: “Should not be consumed if you are consuming other products containing green tea on the same day”, “Should not be consumed by pregnant or lactating women and children below 18 years old”, and “Should not be consumed on an empty stomach”. Because a harmful effect below 800 mg could not be ruled out, the extracts were also placed under Union scrutiny (Part C), with a decision on a further prohibition or restriction due within four years. Aqueous extracts that, once made into a drink, resemble traditional green tea infusions are excluded, as is a highly purified EGCG (at least 90%) authorised separately as a novel food.

A horizontal dose scale in milligrams of EGCG per day. A green bar shows mean intake from brewed green tea at 90 to 300 milligrams, with a faint extension to 866 for high consumers; a violet bar shows food supplements spanning 5 to 1,000 milligrams; a red bar shows case reports of liver injury from 140 to about 1,000 milligrams; a dot marks the Minnesota trial at 843 milligrams, where 6.7 percent had raised ALT against 0.7 percent on placebo; and a vertical cyan line at 800 milligrams marks the EFSA transaminase signal and the EU limit per daily portion. WHERE THE LIVER SIGNALS SIT ON THE EGCG DOSE SCALE milligrams of EGCG per day · sources: EFSA 2018, USP 2020, Minnesota Green Tea Trial, EU 2022/2340 800 mg/day Green tea infusions: mean daily intake (EFSA) faint: high consumers up to 866 Food supplements: daily EGCG supplied (EFSA) Liver-injury case reports: EGCG intake (USP 2020) from 140 mg Minnesota Green Tea Trial: 843 mg/day for one year ALT rise 6.7% vs 0.7% 90 300 800 1,000 mg EGCG per day (linear scale) BREWED TEA EFSA: in general considered safe at reported intakes THE 800 MG LINE trials at or above it showed a significant transaminase rise; EU daily portion must be below it BELOW IT, NOT CLEARED case reports begin at 140 mg; EFSA identified no safe intake dose, an empty stomach and HLA-B*35:01 all shape the risk

Bars are drawn to scale from the figures stated on this page; the case-report bar ends at about 1,000 mg, as USP reported.

Back to Table of Contents

USP and LiverTox: Cautionary Labeling

The United States Pharmacopeia (USP), which sets quality standards for supplements, has reviewed green tea extract safety twice:

The 2020 review reports the cautionary labeling requirement in USP's Powdered Decaffeinated Green Tea Extract monograph, which reads: “Do not take on an empty stomach. Take with food. Do not use if you have a liver problem and discontinue use and consult a healthcare practitioner if you develop symptoms of liver trouble, such as abdominal pain, dark urine, or jaundice (yellowing of the skin or eyes).”

The NIH's LiverTox database states that green tea extract and, more rarely, ingestion of large amounts of green tea have been implicated in cases of clinically apparent acute liver injury, including instances of acute liver failure and either need for urgent liver transplantation or death.

Back to Table of Contents

Symptoms Named in Label Warnings

The USP label statement names abdominal pain, dark urine, and jaundice (yellowing of the skin or eyes) as symptoms of liver trouble, and directs the user to discontinue the product and consult a healthcare practitioner if they appear. In the DILIN series, 83% of patients with green tea-associated liver injury were jaundiced and 88% had symptoms; the Navarro review describes the injury from green tea extract as an acute hepatitis-like injury.

Most green tea extract liver injury in the published series resolved after the product was stopped (29 of 34 cases in the 2009 review). Liver injury is confirmed with blood tests such as Liver Function Tests (ALT, AST, bilirubin). Because green tea extract is often one ingredient among many in multi-ingredient products, the Navarro review notes that in most supplement-associated cases the responsible component is unknown or can only be suspected — which is why a full list of supplements matters to a clinician assessing liver injury.

Back to Table of Contents

Who the Research Raises Concerns For

Back to Table of Contents

What Studies and Regulators Report About Dose and Timing

Decisions about supplements belong with a clinician. The findings below are what the studies and regulators report:

  1. Brewed tea versus extracts. EFSA considers traditionally brewed green tea in general safe at reported intakes, while noting rare idiosyncratic cases. The Hu review found hepatic adverse events with concentrated bolus doses, not with brewed tea or extracts taken in beverages or food.
  2. The randomized trial evidence. In the Minnesota Green Tea Trial, 1,075 postmenopausal women took green tea extract containing 843 mg of EGCG or placebo daily for one year. ALT elevations occurred in 6.7% of the extract group versus 0.7% on placebo, and 1.3% had ALT-related serious adverse events (Dostal and colleagues, 2015). A follow-up analysis of 1,021 women with normal baseline liver tests found that 5.1% in the extract group developed moderate or more severe liver-test abnormalities, an odds ratio of 7.0 compared with placebo (Yu and colleagues, 2017).
  3. Dose limits. The EU requires a daily portion of food to contain less than 800 mg of EGCG from green tea extracts. EFSA identified no intake that was free of concern. The Hu review derived a safe intake level of 338 mg EGCG per day for tea preparations taken as a solid bolus dose, and an observed safe level of 704 mg per day for preparations in beverage form.
  4. Food and timing. The USP label reads “Do not take on an empty stomach. Take with food.” and the EU regulation requires a warning against consumption on an empty stomach.
  5. Combined products. The EU regulation requires a warning against consuming the product on a day when other products containing green tea are consumed, because intake from several products can exceed the maximum daily dose.
  6. Product variability. USP's 2020 review found that catechin profiles vary significantly with manufacturing processes, and EFSA cited the wide variation in extract composition as one reason it could not set a safe intake.
  7. Timing of onset. In the DILIN series, symptoms began a median of 72 days (range 15–448) after the product was started; in the Minnesota trial, the liver-test abnormalities developed during the one-year intervention period.

Back to Table of Contents

Other Safety Considerations

These cautions concern concentrated, high-dose extracts. Brewed green tea is a different exposure, which EFSA assessed separately and in general considers safe at the intakes reported in Europe.

Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

  1. Oketch-Rabah HA et al. (2020). United States Pharmacopeia (USP) comprehensive review of the hepatotoxicity of green tea extracts. Toxicol Rep — PubMed PMID: 32140423
  2. Mazzanti G et al. (2009). Hepatotoxicity from green tea: a review of the literature and two unpublished cases. Eur J Clin Pharmacol — PubMed PMID: 19198822
  3. Sarma DN et al. (2008). Safety of green tea extracts: a systematic review by the US Pharmacopeia. Drug Saf — PubMed PMID: 18484782
  4. Hu J et al. (2018). The safety of green tea and green tea extract consumption in adults — results of a systematic review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol — PubMed PMID: 29580974
  5. Navarro VJ et al. (2017). Liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements. Hepatology — PubMed PMID: 27677775
  6. Chow HH et al. (2003). Pharmacokinetics and safety of green tea polyphenols after multiple-dose administration of EGCG and Polyphenon E in healthy individuals. Clin Cancer Res — PubMed PMID: 12960117
  7. Pezeshki A et al. (2016). The effect of green tea extract supplementation on liver enzymes in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Prev Med — PubMed PMID: 26955458
  8. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS), Younes M et al. (2018). Scientific opinion on the safety of green tea catechins. EFSA J 16(4):e05239 — PubMed PMID: 32625874
  9. Dostal AM et al. (2015). The safety of green tea extract supplementation in postmenopausal women at risk for breast cancer: results of the Minnesota Green Tea Trial. Food Chem Toxicol 83:26–35 — PubMed PMID: 26051348
  10. Yu Z et al. (2017). Effect of green tea supplements on liver enzyme elevation: results from a randomized intervention study in the United States. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 10(10):571–579 — PubMed PMID: 28765194
  11. Hoofnagle JH et al. (2021). HLA-B*35:01 and green tea-induced liver injury. Hepatology 73(6):2484–2493 — PubMed PMID: 32892374
  12. Chow HH et al. (2005). Effects of dosing condition on the oral bioavailability of green tea catechins after single-dose administration of Polyphenon E in healthy individuals. Clin Cancer Res 11(12):4627–4633 — PubMed PMID: 15958649
  13. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury. Green Tea. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2012–) — PubMed PMID: 31643260
  14. Lambert JD et al. (2010). Hepatotoxicity of high oral dose (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in mice. Food Chem Toxicol 48(1):409–416 — PubMed PMID: 19883714
  15. James KD, Forester SC, Lambert JD (2015). Dietary pretreatment with green tea polyphenol, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate reduces the bioavailability and hepatotoxicity of subsequent oral bolus doses of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Food Chem Toxicol 76:103–108 — PubMed PMID: 25528115
  16. James KD, Kennett MJ, Lambert JD (2018). Potential role of the mitochondria as a target for the hepatotoxic effects of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in mice. Food Chem Toxicol 111:302–309 — PubMed PMID: 29175576
  17. Hurrell RF, Reddy M, Cook JD (1999). Inhibition of non-haem iron absorption in man by polyphenolic-containing beverages. Br J Nutr 81(4):289–295 — PubMed PMID: 10999016
  18. Misaka S et al. (2014). Green tea ingestion greatly reduces plasma concentrations of nadolol in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 95(4):432–438 — PubMed PMID: 24419562
  19. Golden EB et al. (2009). Green tea polyphenols block the anticancer effects of bortezomib and other boronic acid-based proteasome inhibitors. Blood 113(23):5927–5937 — PubMed PMID: 19190249
  20. Taylor JR, Wilt VM (1999). Probable antagonism of warfarin by green tea. Ann Pharmacother 33(4):426–428 — PubMed PMID: 10332534

PubMed Topic Searches

  1. PubMed: Green tea extract hepatotoxicity
  2. PubMed: EGCG and liver injury
  3. PubMed: Green tea catechin safety and dose

Back to Table of Contents

External Resources

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents