Bell Peppers, Blood Sugar, Weight, and the Heart

Table of Contents

1. What Is in a Pepper That Could Matter
2. Blood Sugar: A Vegetable With Almost No Glycaemic Load
3. Vegetables and Type 2 Diabetes: What the Cohorts Show
4. Weight: The Energy-Density Experiments
5. Weight: The Long-Term Cohorts
6. The Few Pepper-Specific Human Studies
7. The Heart: Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality
8. Vitamin C, Potassium and Blood Pressure
9. Cooking, Serving and Practical Amounts
10. Who Gets the Most From This
11. Key Research Papers
12. Connections
13. Featured Videos

What Is in a Pepper That Could Matter

Per 100 g of raw red bell pepper, USDA FoodData Central lists 26 calories, 92.2 g of water, 6.0 g of carbohydrate (of which 2.1 g is fibre), 1.0 g of protein, 0.3 g of fat, 211 mg of potassium, 128 mg of vitamin C, 0.29 mg of vitamin B6, 46 micrograms of folate and 1.6 mg of vitamin E. Green pepper is lighter still: 20 calories, 4.6 g of carbohydrate, 1.7 g of fibre, 175 mg of potassium, 80 mg of vitamin C. A whole pepper of 100 to 130 g is therefore around 25 to 35 calories, roughly what a single square of chocolate costs.

Four features are relevant to this article. The energy density is about 0.26 calories per gram — among the lowest of any food, lower than most fruit and lower than the leanest protein. The carbohydrate is small and a third of it is fibre, so the digestible sugar in a whole pepper is a few grams. The potassium is a modest but real 4 to 5% of the Daily Value per 100 g. And the vitamin C and polyphenols (quercetin and luteolin, both measured highest in red peppers by Sun and colleagues in 2007) are the compounds with any mechanistic claim on blood vessels. Everything below follows from those four facts.

Back to Table of Contents

Blood Sugar: A Vegetable With Almost No Glycaemic Load

The glycaemic index tables that list breads, rices and fruits generally do not list bell peppers, for the simple reason that a person cannot eat enough of them to produce a measurable glucose curve: the standard GI test uses a portion containing 50 g of available carbohydrate, which would be well over a kilogram of raw pepper. Glycaemic load — the index multiplied by the carbohydrate in a real serving — is the more useful measure for a food like this, and for a whole pepper it is close to zero. A whole red pepper of around 120 g carries about 4 to 5 g of digestible carbohydrate; the same carbohydrate is in a fifth of a slice of bread.

So the direct answer to "do bell peppers raise blood sugar?" is: negligibly, in anyone. The more useful question is what they do to the meal. Here the mechanism is volume and displacement rather than any active ingredient. A pepper-heavy salad or a stir-fry that is half peppers is a meal in which a substantial part of the plate contributes crunch, sweetness and fullness while contributing almost no glucose. If it replaces part of the rice or pasta, the meal's glycaemic load falls in proportion; if it is simply added, it slows eating and increases satiety (next section) without adding to the glucose the meal delivers. Where rice is part of the dish, brown rice keeps the pepper company better than white: its intact bran slows the starch.

What this page will not claim is that peppers lower blood sugar in the sense of an active effect. Cell and animal work on pepper extracts and on capsanthin exists; it has not been reproduced as a human trial of the vegetable, and a pepper's contribution to glucose control in a real person is the passive one just described. That is still valuable. It is not a treatment.

Back to Table of Contents

Vegetables and Type 2 Diabetes: What the Cohorts Show

Several large meta-analyses have asked whether people who eat more vegetables develop less type 2 diabetes. The pattern across them is consistent, and it is more specific than "vegetables are good":

• Carter and colleagues, BMJ 2010 (six cohorts): green leafy vegetables were associated with a 14% lower risk of type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio 0.86). Total vegetables, total fruit and fruit-and-vegetables combined showed no significant benefit.
• Cooper and colleagues, EPIC-InterAct 2012 (12,403 cases among 340,234 Europeans, plus a meta-analysis): total fruit and vegetable intake, highest versus lowest quarter, hazard ratio 0.90 with a confidence interval crossing 1 — not significant. Among vegetable subtypes, only root vegetables in EPIC-InterAct and green leafy vegetables in the pooled analysis (relative risk 0.84) were significantly protective.
• Li and colleagues, BMJ Open 2014 (13 comparisons, 24,013 cases): each daily serving of fruit, relative risk 0.93; each daily serving of vegetables, 0.90 but again not statistically significant; green leafy vegetables, 0.87 per 0.2 serving.
• Wang and colleagues, 2016 (23 articles): highest versus lowest intake, relative risk 0.87 for green leafy vegetables, 0.72 for "yellow vegetables", 0.82 for cruciferous vegetables, 0.75 for blueberries. "Yellow vegetables" is a category defined by the underlying questionnaires — typically carrots, squash and similar — and bell peppers are not consistently placed in it, so that estimate should not be read as a pepper result.

The honest reading: the diabetes-protective signal in the cohort literature is carried by leafy greens, with some support for cruciferous and deep-coloured vegetables, and peppers have not been studied as a category of their own. A person eating peppers as part of a vegetable-rich diet is doing the thing associated with lower risk; the pepper's individual contribution is unknown. These are cohorts, not trials, and people who eat a lot of vegetables differ from those who do not in many ways the statistics cannot fully remove.

Back to Table of Contents

Weight: The Energy-Density Experiments

This is the strongest human evidence on the page, and although it was not done with bell peppers specifically, it was done with exactly the kind of food a pepper is. People tend to eat a fairly constant weight of food, so meals built from foods with fewer calories per gram lead to fewer calories eaten without more hunger. Rolls, Ello-Martin and Tohill summarised the intervention evidence in 2004: because fruit and vegetables are mostly water and fibre, adding them lowers the energy density of the diet, increases satiety and reduces energy intake, and advice to eat more of these foods works better than purely restrictive advice.

Two controlled experiments from the same laboratory show the size of the effect:

• Rolls, Roe and Meengs (2004) gave 42 women a compulsory first-course salad once a week for seven weeks, varying its energy density (0.33, 0.67 or 1.33 calories per gram) and its size (150 or 300 g), then let them eat as much pasta as they wanted. Compared with no salad, the low-energy-density salads cut total meal intake by 7% (small) and 12% (large); the high-energy-density salads — same vegetables, more dressing and cheese — increased it by 8% and 17%. A raw bell pepper, at 0.26 calories per gram, is lower in energy density than even the leanest salad in that study.
• Ello-Martin and colleagues (2007) ran a year-long randomised trial in 97 obese women. Both groups were counselled to eat less fat; one group was additionally told to eat more water-rich foods, especially fruit and vegetables, with no calorie targets in either. After a year the fruit-and-vegetable group had lost 7.9 kg against 6.4 kg, ate a greater weight of food at lower energy density, and reported less hunger. The lesson is the positive instruction — add the vegetables — not the fat restriction, which both groups shared.

In pepper terms: a whole large red pepper of around 160 g, sliced and eaten before or with a meal, is about 40 calories. Eaten with a little olive oil or hummus rather than a heavy dressing, it stays low in energy density, adds crunch and volume, and on the evidence above displaces a meaningful number of calories from whatever follows. That is the mechanism by which peppers help with weight, and it is a well-tested one.

Back to Table of Contents

Weight: The Long-Term Cohorts

Bertoia and colleagues (2015) followed 133,468 US men and women for up to 24 years, looking at how changes in intake of individual fruits and vegetables tracked with weight change over successive four-year periods. Each additional daily serving of vegetables was associated with about a quarter of a pound (0.25 lb) less weight gain over four years, and each serving of fruit with about half a pound less. Berries and apples or pears were the standout fruits; among vegetables, the non-starchy ones tracked with less gain, whereas starchy vegetables — corn, peas and potatoes — tracked with more. Bell peppers are firmly in the non-starchy group, and the study's hypothesis, that higher-fibre, lower-glycaemic-load produce is the kind that helps, describes them well. The effect sizes are small per serving and are associations, not trials; their value is in showing the direction over decades in a very large group.

Back to Table of Contents

The Few Pepper-Specific Human Studies

Readers deserve to know how thin this layer is. A PubMed search for human trials of sweet or bell peppers and glucose, cholesterol or weight turns up almost nothing on the ordinary vegetable. What exists concerns a special variety and an extract:

• CH-19 Sweet is a non-pungent Japanese pepper cultivar that makes capsinoids — heat-free relatives of capsaicin that ordinary bell peppers do not contain in meaningful amounts. Reinbach and colleagues (2009) tested it in 27 people over alternating three-week periods of over- and under-eating: CH-19 Sweet pepper (and a combination of capsaicin with green tea) reduced energy intake during the over-eating phase. Snitker and colleagues (2009) gave 80 overweight adults 6 mg a day of purified capsinoids or placebo for 12 weeks: weight change did not differ (0.9 versus 0.5 kg, not significant), total body fat did not differ, and only abdominal fat fell slightly more in the capsinoid group (−1.1% versus −0.2%), with a non-significant trend toward higher fat oxidation. This is a small, mostly null trial of a purified compound, and it says nothing about eating bell peppers.
• Chilli studies do not transfer. Ahuja and colleagues (2006) found that four weeks of a cayenne-chilli-supplemented diet lowered post-meal insulin in 36 adults. That is a capsaicin effect. Bell peppers carry a broken copy of the capsaicin gene (Pun1) and make essentially none, so every "peppers boost metabolism" claim that rests on chilli data does not apply to the sweet pepper.

That is the complete human literature specific to the pepper on these outcomes, as far as a careful search finds. A reader should treat any confident claim that bell peppers "lower blood sugar" or "burn fat" as unsupported.

Back to Table of Contents

The Heart: Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality

Here the cohort evidence is large, consistent across continents, and dose-dependent, which is the pattern that makes epidemiologists take an association seriously.

• Aune and colleagues (2017) pooled 95 prospective studies. For every 200 g a day of fruit and vegetables, the relative risk was 0.92 for coronary heart disease, 0.84 for stroke, 0.92 for cardiovascular disease, 0.97 for total cancer and 0.90 for all-cause mortality, with risk continuing to fall up to about 800 g a day (ten small servings) for everything except cancer. Green leafy vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, salads, apples and pears and citrus fruits each showed associations of their own; peppers were not analysed separately.
• Wang and colleagues (2014) pooled 16 cohorts with 833,234 participants and 56,423 deaths: each daily serving of vegetables was associated with a 5% lower risk of death from any cause, with a threshold at about five servings a day of fruit and vegetables combined, after which risk did not fall further.
• The PURE study (Miller and colleagues, 2017) followed 135,335 people in 18 countries across five continents, including regions the earlier studies had never covered. Higher fruit, vegetable and legume intake was associated with lower total and non-cardiovascular mortality, and the benefit was largely reached by three to four servings a day — a reassuring figure for people in lower-income settings, and a reminder that the first few servings matter most.

Why would a pepper be part of that? Not through any one compound. It is potassium, vitamin C, fibre, polyphenols and, most of all, what it replaces on the plate. The cohorts cannot single it out and this page will not pretend they do. A bell pepper is a vegetable serving, and the evidence that vegetable servings are associated with living longer is about as good as nutritional epidemiology gets.

Back to Table of Contents

Vitamin C, Potassium and Blood Pressure

Two of the pepper's nutrients have randomised-trial evidence on blood pressure — at supplement doses. It is worth knowing both the effect and the gap between the trial dose and the pepper.

Vitamin C. Juraschek and colleagues (2012) pooled 29 randomised trials of vitamin C supplementation (median 500 mg a day for eight weeks). Systolic blood pressure fell by 3.8 mmHg and diastolic by 1.5 mmHg overall; in people with hypertension the systolic fall was 4.9 mmHg. A raw red pepper supplies about 130 mg per 100 g, so a person eating one or two a day is at a quarter to a half of the median trial dose, from food. Whether food vitamin C reproduces the trial effect has not been tested directly. The cohort signal is in the same direction: in EPIC-Norfolk (Khaw and colleagues, 2001), each 20 micromol/L rise in blood vitamin C — about one extra daily serving of fruit or vegetables — was associated with roughly 20% lower mortality from all causes and from cardiovascular disease.

Potassium. Aburto and colleagues' 2013 review for the World Health Organization pooled 22 randomised trials and 11 cohorts: higher potassium intake lowered systolic blood pressure by about 3.5 mmHg and diastolic by about 2 mmHg in the trials, with the largest effect in people with hypertension, and was associated with a 24% lower risk of stroke in the cohorts, with no adverse effect on kidney function or blood lipids in people with normal kidneys. A red pepper's 211 mg per 100 g is a real contribution — two peppers a day are roughly a tenth of the 4,700 mg Daily Value — but a banana, a potato, beans or spinach carry more per serving. Peppers add to a high-potassium diet; they do not make one on their own.

People with advanced kidney disease or on potassium-sparing medication are told to watch potassium intake; a bell pepper is among the lower-potassium vegetables and usually fits, but that is a conversation for their renal dietitian rather than this page.

Back to Table of Contents

Cooking, Serving and Practical Amounts

For the outcomes on this page, cooking is mostly neutral. Energy density stays very low however a pepper is cooked, unless it is drowned in oil or stuffed with something calorie-dense; potassium and fibre survive cooking (potassium leaches into boiling water, so soups and stews keep it and boiled-and-drained peppers lose some). Vitamin C is the casualty of long wet cooking, as the vitamin C article details, and the carotenoids are the beneficiaries of cooking with fat, as the carotenoid article details.

Practical patterns that use the evidence above:

• A pepper before the meal. Half a large pepper in strips, or a pepper-and-tomato salad dressed with a spoon of olive oil, eaten first — the Rolls first-course pattern. Cheap, quick, and the best-tested weight strategy on the page.
• Peppers for half the volume of a stir-fry or curry, alongside onions, greens and a modest portion of brown rice, so that the plate's glycaemic load comes down without the plate shrinking.
• Roasted peppers in the fridge for the week — low-calorie, potassium-retaining, and their carotenoids more available than raw.
• Not a diet food to be eaten plain. Whole-food fat (olive oil, avocado, nuts, cheese in moderation) makes peppers more filling and unlocks their carotenoids without materially raising the energy density of the meal. The fat-free-dressing habit is a mistake on every count.

A reasonable amount, if weight or blood pressure is the goal: one to two peppers a day, as part of the four to five vegetable servings the cohorts consistently reward, rather than as a substitute for them.

Back to Table of Contents

Who Gets the Most From This

People trying to lose weight without being hungry. The energy-density trials are the clearest evidence on the page, and a bell pepper is a textbook low-energy-density food that is sweet, crunchy and eaten raw without preparation.

People with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes managing their plate. Not because the pepper lowers glucose, but because it is a large, satisfying, near-zero-glycaemic-load food that can take up the room otherwise given to refined starch.

People with raised blood pressure. Through potassium, vitamin C and displacement of salty processed food, within a diet that also carries the higher-potassium foods.

Anyone eating fewer than three vegetable servings a day. PURE and the mortality meta-analyses agree that the first three or four servings carry most of the benefit. A pepper is one of the easiest of them to add.

Who should be careful: people with fructose malabsorption or on a strict low-FODMAP protocol may find that large servings of ripe red or yellow peppers, which are sweeter than green, cause symptoms — green peppers are generally the better-tolerated choice, and the safety article covers this alongside the allergy and nightshade questions.

Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

Author names, titles and journals are plain text; only the PMID or DOI is a link. Every identifier below was checked against PubMed before publication.

1. Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, et al. (2017). Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality — a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. International Journal of Epidemiology. — PubMed PMID: 28338764
2. Wang X, Ouyang Y, Liu J, et al. (2014). Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. — PubMed PMID: 25073782
3. Miller V, Mente A, Dehghan M, et al. (2017). Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. — PubMed PMID: 28864331
4. Carter P, Gray LJ, Troughton J, Khunti K, Davies MJ (2010). Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. — PubMed PMID: 20724400
5. Cooper AJ, Forouhi NG, Ye Z, et al. (2012). Fruit and vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes: EPIC-InterAct prospective study and meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. — PubMed PMID: 22854878
6. Li M, Fan Y, Zhang X, Hou W, Tang Z (2014). Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ Open. — PubMed PMID: 25377009
7. Wang PY, Fang JC, Gao ZH, Zhang C, Xie SY (2016). Higher intake of fruits, vegetables or their fiber reduces the risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Diabetes Investigation. — PubMed PMID: 26816602
8. Rolls BJ, Ello-Martin JA, Tohill BC (2004). What can intervention studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and weight management? Nutrition Reviews. — PubMed PMID: 14995052
9. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS (2004). Salad and satiety: energy density and portion size of a first-course salad affect energy intake at lunch. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. — PubMed PMID: 15389416
10. Ello-Martin JA, Roe LS, Ledikwe JH, Beach AM, Rolls BJ (2007). Dietary energy density in the treatment of obesity: a year-long trial comparing 2 weight-loss diets. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. — PubMed PMID: 17556681
11. Bertoia ML, Mukamal KJ, Cahill LE, et al. (2015). Changes in intake of fruits and vegetables and weight change in United States men and women followed for up to 24 years: analysis from three prospective cohort studies. PLoS Medicine. — PubMed PMID: 26394033
12. Reinbach HC, Smeets A, Martinussen T, Møller P, Westerterp-Plantenga MS (2009). Effects of capsaicin, green tea and CH-19 sweet pepper on appetite and energy intake in humans in negative and positive energy balance. Clinical Nutrition. — PubMed PMID: 19345452
13. Snitker S, Fujishima Y, Shen H, et al. (2009). Effects of novel capsinoid treatment on fatness and energy metabolism in humans: possible pharmacogenetic implications. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. — PubMed PMID: 19056576 (purified capsinoids, not the vegetable; weight result null)
14. Ahuja KD, Robertson IK, Geraghty DP, Ball MJ (2006). Effects of chili consumption on postprandial glucose, insulin, and energy metabolism. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. — PubMed PMID: 16825682 (cayenne chilli; does not apply to sweet peppers)
15. Juraschek SP, Guallar E, Appel LJ, Miller ER 3rd (2012). Effects of vitamin C supplementation on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. — PubMed PMID: 22492364
16. Aburto NJ, Hanson S, Gutierrez H, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP (2013). Effect of increased potassium intake on cardiovascular risk factors and disease: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ. — PubMed PMID: 23558164
17. Khaw KT, Bingham S, Welch A, et al. (2001). Relation between plasma ascorbic acid and mortality in men and women in EPIC-Norfolk prospective study: a prospective population study. Lancet. — PubMed PMID: 11247548
18. Sun T, Xu Z, Wu CT, Janes M, Prinyawiwatkul W, No HK (2007). Antioxidant activities of different colored sweet bell peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). Journal of Food Science. — PubMed PMID: 17995862
19. Stewart C Jr, Kang BC, Liu K, et al. (2005). The Pun1 gene for pungency in pepper encodes a putative acyltransferase. The Plant Journal. — PubMed PMID: 15918882

PubMed Topic Searches

1. PubMed: human trials of sweet or bell peppers
2. PubMed: vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes in cohort studies
3. PubMed: energy density, satiety and vegetables

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

• All Food
• Bell Peppers
• Bell Pepper Benefits: What the Evidence Actually Shows
• Bell Peppers: Nutrient Profile
• Bell Pepper Vitamin C: Red Versus Green
• Bell Pepper Carotenoids, Capsanthin, and Eye Health
• Bell Peppers: Nightshades, Allergy, Pesticides, and Safety
• Type 2 Diabetes
• Hypertension
• Potassium
• Vitamin C
• Spinach
• Tomatoes

Back to Table of Contents

Featured Videos