Omaveloxolone: The First Approved Drug for Friedreich Ataxia


Omaveloxolone is a capsule taken once a day. On February 28, 2023 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it as the first treatment for Friedreich ataxia, an inherited disease that slowly damages the spinal cord, the nerves and the heart. The European Union followed on February 9, 2024. Both approvals cover people aged 16 years and older.

The drug does not replace the protein that is missing in the disease, frataxin. It acts on a defence system that cells use against oxidative stress. The approval rests mainly on one placebo-controlled trial of 103 people, called MOXIe, in which people on the drug scored 2.4 points better on an ataxia rating scale after 48 weeks than people on placebo. The longer-term figures come from people who kept taking the drug in an open follow-up study, compared with untreated people from a natural-history study. That comparison was not a randomized trial.

The disease itself, its genetics, symptoms and heart care, is described on the Friedreich's Ataxia page. This page goes further into the drug: how it is thought to work, what each trial found, what the label says about safety, and what is still unknown.


Table of Contents

  1. Omaveloxolone at a Glance
  2. Frataxin Loss and a Weakened Antioxidant Defence
  3. How Omaveloxolone Switches On Nrf2
  4. MOXIe Part 1: Finding the Dose
  5. MOXIe Part 2: The 48-Week Placebo-Controlled Trial
  6. The High-Arched-Foot (Pes Cavus) Subgroup
  7. The Open-Label Extension and the 3-Year Matched Comparison
  8. Results Since Approval
  9. The Approvals, the Label and the Dose
  10. Liver Enzymes, a Heart-Strain Marker and Cholesterol
  11. Side Effects and How Often They Occurred
  12. Drug Interactions, Food and Hormonal Contraception
  13. Pregnancy, Breastfeeding and Animal Findings
  14. Other Diseases Where It Was Tested
  15. What Is Not Known
  16. Regulatory Documents
  17. Key Research Papers
  18. Connections
  19. Featured Videos

Omaveloxolone at a Glance

Frataxin Loss and a Weakened Antioxidant Defence

In Friedreich ataxia a repeat expansion in the FXN gene lowers the amount of frataxin, a protein inside mitochondria, the energy-producing parts of the cell. The disease page explains how that leads to iron building up in mitochondria and to damage from reactive oxygen. Large sensory nerve cells, the spinal cord and the heart muscle are hit hardest.

Cells normally answer oxidative stress by switching on a set of protective genes. The master switch for that answer is a protein called nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). When a cell is under oxidative strain, Nrf2 moves into the cell nucleus and turns on genes for antioxidant enzymes.

Several laboratory studies found that this switch is itself weakened in Friedreich ataxia:

The European Medicines Agency's public summary puts it plainly: Nrf2 levels and activity appear to be reduced in patients with Friedreich's ataxia. That is the reasoning behind the drug. If the cell's own antioxidant switch is stuck, a drug that pushes it back on might slow the damage, even though the missing frataxin is still missing.

How Omaveloxolone Switches On Nrf2

Inside a resting cell, Nrf2 is constantly tagged for destruction and broken down. A 2023 drug profile in the journal Drugs states that omaveloxolone may activate the Nrf2 pathway by blocking that tagging (ubiquitination) and breakdown, so more Nrf2 survives to reach the nucleus.

The U.S. label is careful on this point. It states that the precise mechanism by which omaveloxolone works in Friedreich ataxia is unknown, and that the drug has been shown to activate the Nrf2 pathway in laboratory tests and in animals and humans. The MOXIe part 1 report also describes it as a suppressor of NF-kB, a switch for inflammation.

Laboratory findings that support the idea:

Not every animal result has been positive. A 2025 study of an inducible Friedreich ataxia mouse found no benefit from omaveloxolone or from another Nrf2-inducing drug, dimethyl fumarate, on any of several movement, gait and sensation tests, although male mice showed more decline and somewhat better response. A second 2025 study in mice with severe frataxin-deficient heart disease is described under Other Diseases Where It Was Tested.

MOXIe Part 1: Finding the Dose

MOXIe began as a dose-finding study. Sixty-nine people with Friedreich ataxia were randomized 3 to 1 to omaveloxolone or placebo, in groups of eight, at doses from 2.5 to 300 mg a day, for 12 weeks. The results were published in 2019.

The authors chose 150 mg a day for the next stage. The pes cavus finding shaped how part 2 was designed and analysed.

MOXIe Part 2: The 48-Week Placebo-Controlled Trial

Part 2 was an international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at 11 institutions in the United States, Europe and Australia (registered as NCT02255435). The authors call it a registrational phase 2 trial, meaning it was designed to support approval. It was published in 2021 in the Annals of Neurology.

Who took part

People aged 16 to 40 with genetically confirmed Friedreich ataxia and an ataxia score between 20 and 80 could join. Of 155 people screened, 103 were randomized: 51 to omaveloxolone 150 mg a day and 52 to placebo. According to the label, they also had to be able to complete an exercise test and have a heart pumping fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction) of at least 40%. The mean age was 24, 53% were male and 97% were White. The full paper reports that 92% could still walk.

The rating scale

The ataxia scale scores four areas: speech and swallowing, arm and hand coordination, leg coordination, and upright stability. The maximum score is 99, and a lower score means less impairment. In untreated people the score rises over time as the disease progresses.

The main result

The pre-planned main analysis covered the 82 people without pes cavus who had at least one follow-up visit: 40 on the drug and 42 on placebo. After 48 weeks:

The label gives the same analysis as minus 1.56 and minus 2.41 points (p = 0.0138), a rounding difference. The full paper reports that the drug improved all four parts of the scale, with the largest effect on upright stability, and that the placebo group's upright stability worsened steadily.

Other measures

The secondary outcomes were tested in a fixed order, and the first one in line, the patient's own impression of change, did not differ significantly between the groups. Under the trial's statistical rules, that meant none of the secondary measures counted as significant, including the clinician's impression of change, a peg-board hand test, a timed 25-foot walk, falls, exercise capacity and an activities-of-daily-living score. The authors note that the trial was not powered for these. In a later count of individual responders, more people on the drug improved, and fewer worsened, on the ataxia score, the daily-living score and the patient impression.

Things that complicate the picture

The High-Arched-Foot (Pes Cavus) Subgroup

Pes cavus is a high-arched foot that cannot flatten, common in Friedreich ataxia. Because part 1 had shown a weaker response in people with it, part 2 handled them separately:

The authors wrote that, as in part 1, the drug improved the ataxia score less in people with pes cavus, and that the repeat of the finding suggests it is real, although the reason is not obvious. They raised several possibilities: fixed foot deformity that does not easily reverse, a subgroup affected in other ways, or simply that people with pes cavus, as defined in the trial, were a more severely affected group.

The European Medicines Agency's summary explains the exclusion from the main analysis by the lack of a standard way to grade pes cavus severity and its possible effect on the score. The agency nevertheless considered that the benefits also applied to these patients and to those with more severe disease who had been excluded from the trial.

The Open-Label Extension and the 3-Year Matched Comparison

After part 1 or part 2, participants could take omaveloxolone in an open-label extension, where everyone knew they were on the drug.

The delayed-start analysis (2023)

This compared people who had been on the drug from the start of part 2 with people who switched from placebo to the drug in the extension. The question was whether the late starters would catch up. Among those in the extension, the gap between groups at the end of part 2 was 2.17 points. After 72 weeks in the extension it was 2.91 points, so the late starters did not close the gap. People who had been on the drug since part 2 showed no worsening of their ataxia score, measured from their extension starting point, through 144 weeks. The authors read this as a lasting effect on the course of the disease.

The 3-year propensity-matched comparison (2024): not randomized

Here people in the extension were compared with untreated people from the Friedreich ataxia Clinical Outcome Measures Study, a long-running natural-history study. Each treated person was paired with an untreated person who was similar in sex, age, age at onset, starting ataxia score and walking score.

This was not a randomized comparison. The FDA label describes it as a post hoc, exploratory analysis to be interpreted cautiously, because data collected outside a controlled study may be affected by confounding, meaning hidden differences between the groups. Two of its authors were employees of the developer, as its conflict-of-interest statement records.

Results Since Approval

The drug became available in the United States in July 2023, according to a clinic in Philadelphia that reported its first year. Smaller clinic reports and reviews have followed.

The Approvals, the Label and the Dose

The FDA approval notice of February 28, 2023 describes the drug as the first treatment for Friedreich ataxia, based on the 48-week trial and the open-label extension. It notes that 9 of the participants (18%) were younger than 18. This page reads the label version effective April 6, 2026, through openFDA.

The dose as the label gives it

Why food and applesauce matter

Heart rhythm

A 2025 study in 30 healthy adults gave a single 450 mg dose, three times the approved dose, with a high-fat meal. It found no clinically significant lengthening of the QT interval, the part of the heart tracing that some drugs prolong. The label reports the same result.

Monitoring the label sets out

The label states that liver enzymes, bilirubin, the heart-strain marker and blood lipids are measured before the drug is started and during treatment. Details follow in the next section.

Liver Enzymes, a Heart-Strain Marker and Cholesterol

Liver enzymes

The most frequent laboratory change is a rise in two liver enzymes, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). According to the label, in the main trial:

The trial paper adds that 15 people on the drug (29%) and none on placebo reached 3 times the normal limit for ALT, and that 12 of those 15 were back to normal within 4 weeks of stopping. The authors suggested that the rises may reflect Nrf2 switching on the genes for these enzymes rather than liver damage, since the drug and a related compound raised the enzymes' gene activity in cells.

The label sets out testing of ALT, AST and total bilirubin before starting, every month for the first 3 months and from time to time after that. It instructs stopping the drug at once if the enzymes rise above 5 times normal, or above 3 times normal with signs of liver dysfunction such as raised bilirubin, and allows a restart with closer testing once the values settle. A 2025 review based on the views of four Friedreich ataxia specialists and a liver specialist proposed, for routine clinic follow-up, pausing treatment at 3 times normal even without other signs, then restarting with step-by-step dose increases and testing every 2 weeks for about 3 months.

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)

B-type natriuretic peptide is released by a strained heart. According to the label, 14% of people on the drug had a rise from their starting value to above 100 pg/mL, against 4% on placebo, and 4% on the drug had a level above 200 pg/mL. People with values above 200 pg/mL, or with significant heart disease other than mild to moderate Friedreich-related heart muscle disease, were kept out of the trial. The label states that it is unclear whether the rises came from the drug or from the heart disease that is part of Friedreich ataxia, and that raised values may indicate heart failure.

The label lists signs of fluid overload that it says call for a check of this marker and of heart function: sudden weight gain of 3 pounds or more in a day or 5 pounds or more in a week, swelling of the legs or feet, palpitations, and shortness of breath. It states that managing fluid overload and heart failure may require stopping the drug. In the Philadelphia first-year series the marker was generally unchanged.

Cholesterol

According to the label, in the main trial:

A 2026 study from Vienna followed 17 adults for a year after starting the drug. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol rose by 35 to 50 mg/dL and apolipoprotein B by 20 to 25 mg/dL, and stayed up, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides stayed stable. The authors described a lasting shift toward a more artery-clogging lipid profile and called for further study of long-term heart and blood-vessel risk. Cholesterol rises were also among the reports in the FDA's adverse event database.

Side Effects and How Often They Occurred

The label lists the side effects that occurred in at least 10% of people on omaveloxolone in the main trial, and more often than on placebo:

Other findings:

Drug Interactions, Food and Hormonal Contraception

The liver enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) breaks down most of the drug. That makes it sensitive to other medicines that block or speed up this enzyme. A 2025 report described two interaction studies in healthy volunteers.

Medicines that raise or lower omaveloxolone

Medicines that omaveloxolone lowers

Omaveloxolone itself mildly speeds up two drug-processing enzymes. It lowered exposure to midazolam by about 45%, repaglinide by about 35% and rosuvastatin by about 30%, according to the label. It made no important difference to digoxin or metformin.

Hormonal contraception

Because it speeds up the breakdown of other medicines, omaveloxolone may make hormonal contraceptives less effective. The label advises against using it together with combined hormonal contraceptives (pill, patch or ring), implants and progestin-only pills. It describes switching to, or adding, a non-hormonal method, such as a non-hormonal intrauterine device or condoms, during treatment and for 28 days after stopping.

Pregnancy, Breastfeeding and Animal Findings

Other Diseases Where It Was Tested

Laboratory and animal studies have also tested the drug in many other conditions. Those results come from cells and animals, and the drug is approved only for Friedreich ataxia.

What Is Not Known

Regulatory Documents

  1. U.S. National Library of Medicine, DailyMed. Omaveloxolone capsules: prescribing information (read through the openFDA label record effective April 6, 2026, November 2026). DailyMed label
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Drugs@FDA. New Drug Application 216718: original approval February 28, 2023, priority review, new molecular entity. Drugs@FDA record
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves first treatment for Friedreich's ataxia. February 28, 2023. FDA approval notice
  4. European Medicines Agency. Omaveloxolone: European public assessment report, medicine overview and product information. Marketing authorisation issued February 9, 2024. EMA assessment report page
  5. ClinicalTrials.gov. MOXIe, NCT02255435. NCT02255435
  6. ClinicalTrials.gov. Phase 3 study in children and teens aged 2 to 15, NCT06953583. NCT06953583
  7. ClinicalTrials.gov. Long-term safety study, NCT06623890. NCT06623890

Key Research Papers

  1. Lynch DR, Chin MP, Delatycki MB, Subramony SH, Corti M, Hoyle JC, Boesch S, Nachbauer W, Mariotti C, Mathews KD, Giunti P, Wilmot G, Zesiewicz T, Perlman S, Goldsberry A, O'Grady M, Meyer CJ. Safety and Efficacy of Omaveloxolone in Friedreich Ataxia (MOXIe Study). Ann Neurol. 2021;89(2):212-225. PubMed PMID: 33068037
  2. Lynch DR, Farmer J, Hauser L, Blair IA, Wang QQ, Mesaros C, Snyder N, Boesch S, Chin M, Delatycki MB, Giunti P, Goldsberry A, Hoyle C, McBride MG, Nachbauer W, O'Grady M, Perlman S, Subramony SH, Wilmot GR, Zesiewicz T, Meyer C. Safety, pharmacodynamics, and potential benefit of omaveloxolone in Friedreich ataxia. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(1):15-26. PubMed PMID: 30656180
  3. Lynch DR, Chin MP, Boesch S, Delatycki MB, Giunti P, Goldsberry A, Hoyle JC, Mariotti C, Mathews KD, Nachbauer W, O'Grady M, Perlman S, Subramony SH, Wilmot G, Zesiewicz T, Meyer CJ. Efficacy of Omaveloxolone in Friedreich's Ataxia: Delayed-Start Analysis of the MOXIe Extension. Mov Disord. 2023;38(2):313-320. PubMed PMID: 36444905
  4. Lynch DR, Goldsberry A, Rummey C, Farmer J, Boesch S, Delatycki MB, Giunti P, Hoyle JC, Mariotti C, Mathews KD, Nachbauer W, Perlman S, Subramony SH, Wilmot G, Zesiewicz T, Weissfeld L, Meyer C. Propensity matched comparison of omaveloxolone treatment to Friedreich ataxia natural history data. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024;11(1):4-16. PubMed PMID: 37691319
  5. Zahir H, Murai M, Wu L, Valentine M, Hynes SM. Effect of a Supratherapeutic Dose of Omaveloxolone on the Corrected QT Interval in Healthy Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Three-Way Crossover Study. Clin Transl Sci. 2025;18(2):e70139. PubMed PMID: 39976332
  6. Zahir H, Murai M, Wu L, Valentine M, Hynes S. Clinical Assessment of the Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Omaveloxolone in Healthy Adult Participants. J Clin Pharmacol. 2025;65(6):715-730. PubMed PMID: 39920097
  7. Hynes SM, Goldsberry A, Henneghan PD, Murai M, Shinde A, Wells JA, Wu L, Wu T, Zahir H, Khan S. Relative Bioavailability of Omaveloxolone When Capsules Are Sprinkled Over and Mixed in Applesauce Compared With Administration as Intact Omaveloxolone Capsules: A Phase 1, Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Crossover Study in Healthy Adults. J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;64(10):1304-1311. PubMed PMID: 38837775
  8. Pepin XJH, Hynes SM, Zahir H, Walker D, Semmens LQ, Suarez-Sharp S. Understanding the mechanisms of food effect on omaveloxolone pharmacokinetics through physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024;13(10):1771-1783. PubMed PMID: 39219492
  9. Gunther K, Profeta V, Keita M, Park C, Wells M, Sharma S, Schadt K, Lynch DR. Safety Monitoring of Omaveloxolone in Friedreich Ataxia: Results from One Year of Clinical Treatment. Neurol Ther. 2025;14(3):1105-1114. PubMed PMID: 40304846
  10. Perlman S, Anheim M, Boesch S, Lewis JH, Lynch DR. Managing Aminotransferase Elevations in Patients with Friedreich Ataxia Treated with Omaveloxolone: A Review and Expert Opinion on Use Considerations. Neurol Ther. 2025;14(4):1209-1227. PubMed PMID: 40455368
  11. Buchinger D, Scherer T, Dalos D, Milenkovic I. Impact of Omaveloxolone on Serum Lipids in Patients with Friedreich Ataxia: A 1-Year Real-World Analysis. CNS Drugs. 2026;40(9):1285-1294. PubMed PMID: 42371397
  12. Lima SM, Caltagirone M, Messina C, Quartetti U, Rini N, D'Amico F, Brighina F, Di Stefano V. Early experience on omaveloxolone in adult patients with Friedreich's ataxia: a real-world observational study. J Neurol. 2025;272(11):742. PubMed PMID: 41176519
  13. Di Stefano V, Lima SM, Campo S, Mancuso P, Quartetti U, Rini N, Brighina F, Labate A. Reduction of interleukin-6 levels in patients with Friedreich's Ataxia treated with omaveloxolone. J Neurol Sci. 2026;491:126204. PubMed PMID: 42849276
  14. Gallo S, Artusi CA, Ledda C, Budicin S, Imbalzano G, Buzzelli C, Scaglia E, Donetto F, Montanaro E, Romagnolo A, Zibetti M, Rizzone MG, Bozzali M, Lopiano L. Efficacy and Safety of Omaveloxolone in Friedreich Ataxia: Real-World Data from an Advanced Disease Cohort. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2026 (online ahead of print). PubMed PMID: 42953992
  15. Ali A, Cheema WA, Nisar F, Reyaz U, Saad M, Talha M, Sarfraz S, Butt A, Shamoon M, Abdullah A, Shabbir MA, Talha M, Azam H, Abdullah M, Anwaar A. Slowing the curve: a single-arm meta-analysis of mFARS outcomes following omaveloxolone treatment in Friedreich ataxia. BMJ Neurol Open. 2026;8(1):e001670. PubMed PMID: 42206098
  16. Lyons S, Kearney M, Fahey MC, Janjal P, Pandolfo M, Patton P. Pharmacological treatments for Friedreich ataxia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2026;5(5):CD007791. PubMed PMID: 42117563
  17. Liu H, Fan D, Tao H, Shen Z, Yao K. Characteristics of Adverse Events and Clinical Risks of Omaveloxolone Based on FAERS Data. Cerebellum. 2025;24(4):119. PubMed PMID: 40533692
  18. Lee A. Omaveloxolone: First Approval. Drugs. 2023;83(8):725-729. PubMed PMID: 37155124
  19. Abeti R, Baccaro A, Esteras N, Giunti P. Novel Nrf2-Inducer Prevents Mitochondrial Defects and Oxidative Stress in Friedreich's Ataxia Models. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:188. PubMed PMID: 30065630
  20. Paupe V, Dassa EP, Goncalves S, Auchère F, Lönn M, Holmgren A, Rustin P. Impaired nuclear Nrf2 translocation undermines the oxidative stress response in Friedreich ataxia. PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4253. PubMed PMID: 19158945
  21. D'Oria V, Petrini S, Travaglini L, Priori C, Piermarini E, Petrillo S, Carletti B, Bertini E, Piemonte F. Frataxin deficiency leads to reduced expression and impaired translocation of NF-E2-related factor (Nrf2) in cultured motor neurons. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(4):7853-65. PubMed PMID: 23574943
  22. Salinas L, Figueroa F, Montgomery CB, Thai PN, Chiamvimonvat N, Cortopassi G, Dedkova EN. Omaveloxolone, But Not Dimethyl Fumarate, Improves Cardiac Function in Friedreich's Ataxia Mice With Severe Cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14(12):e038505. PubMed PMID: 40501183
  23. Montgomery CB, Salinas L, Cox GP, Adcock LE, Chang T, Figueroa F, Cortopassi G, Dedkova EN. Robust behavioral assessment of the inducible Friedreich's ataxia mouse does not show improvement with NRF2 induction. Dis Model Mech. 2025;18(3):dmm052128. PubMed PMID: 40017373
  24. Madsen KL, Buch AE, Cohen BH, Falk MJ, Goldsberry A, Goldstein A, Karaa A, Koenig MK, Muraresku CC, Meyer C, O'Grady M, Scaglia F, Shieh PB, Vockley J, Zolkipli-Cunningham Z, Haller RG, Vissing J. Safety and efficacy of omaveloxolone in patients with mitochondrial myopathy: MOTOR trial. Neurology. 2020;94(7):e687-e698. PubMed PMID: 31896620
  25. Creelan BC, Gabrilovich DI, Gray JE, Williams CC, Tanvetyanon T, Haura EB, Weber JS, Gibney GT, Markowitz J, Proksch JW, Reisman SA, McKee MD, Chin MP, Meyer CJ, Antonia SJ. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of oral omaveloxolone (RTA 408), a synthetic triterpenoid, in a first-in-human trial of patients with advanced solid tumors. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:4239-4250. PubMed PMID: 28919776
  26. Pilotto F, Chellapandi DM, Puccio H. Omaveloxolone: a groundbreaking milestone as the first FDA-approved drug for Friedreich ataxia. Trends Mol Med. 2024;30(2):117-125. PubMed PMID: 38272714
  27. Umrao A, Pahuja M, Chatterjee NS. Safety and efficacy of omaveloxolone v/s placebo for the treatment of Friedreich's ataxia in patients aged more than 16 years: a systematic review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024;19(1):495. PubMed PMID: 39736600

PubMed Topic Searches

  1. PubMed: omaveloxolone Friedreich ataxia
  2. PubMed: omaveloxolone safety and liver enzymes
  3. PubMed: Nrf2 in Friedreich ataxia

Connections