Nattokinase for Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis

Stroke Prevention — scientific infographic poster

The case for nattokinase in stroke prevention rests on three converging lines of evidence: a rat artery-injury study (Suzuki 2003) and one small randomized comparison with a statin (Ren 2017) showing reduced artery-wall thickening and carotid plaque size; large Japanese prospective epidemiologic cohorts (the Takayama study and the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study) linking higher natto consumption with lower cardiovascular mortality, and in the Takayama study lower stroke mortality; and a sustained-fibrinolysis mechanism that addresses one of the principal contributors to ischemic stroke (thrombus formation on atherosclerotic plaques). Against these, the largest and longest nattokinase trial so far (NAPS, 2021) found no effect on artery-wall thickening over a median of 3 years in healthy older adults. Since 2021 a separate controversy has emerged around claims that nattokinase can dissolve "spike protein clots" in post-COVID and post-vaccine patients — some practitioners and commentators have promoted high-dose nattokinase protocols for this indication, while mainstream regulatory and academic positions remain skeptical of both the underlying premise (the existence and clinical relevance of large amounts of persistent spike-protein-driven fibrinaloid microclots in symptomatic post-acute patients) and of the intervention. This deep-dive presents both the supportive evidence and the unresolved controversies honestly, and sets out what the research reports for primary and secondary stroke prevention.


Table of Contents

  1. The Suzuki 2003 Rat Artery-Injury Study
  2. The Ren 2017 Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Trial
  3. Japanese Natto-Consumption Longevity Epidemiology
  4. The Takayama Study and the JPHC Cohort
  5. Ischemic vs. Hemorrhagic Stroke — Mechanism and Risk
  6. The Post-COVID Spike-Protein-Fibrin Controversy
  7. Practitioner Protocol Claims (Contested)
  8. The Regulatory and Academic Counter-Position
  9. Where the Honest Uncertainty Lies
  10. Primary vs. Secondary Stroke Prevention — What the Research Reports
  11. Cautions, Bleeding Risk, and Hemorrhagic Stroke Contraindication
  12. Key Research Papers
  13. Connections
  14. Featured Videos

The Suzuki 2003 Rat Artery-Injury Study

The Suzuki 2003 paper in Life Sciences is the foundational animal study linking natto to atherosclerosis-relevant changes. It was done entirely in rats; it had no human component.

The Suzuki paper established, in an animal model, the proof-of-principle that dietary natto extract affects atherosclerosis-relevant endpoints. The authors suggested the effects may partly be due to nattokinase, which showed enhanced clot breakdown (fibrinolysis) near the vessel wall. The paper is small, exploratory, and far from definitive — but it set the agenda for the subsequent two decades of nattokinase atherosclerosis research.

Back to Table of Contents

The Ren 2017 Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Trial

The Ren 2017 trial published in Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (the National Medical Journal of China) is a randomized clinical study comparing nattokinase with a statin for carotid atherosclerosis. Design and results:

Results:

The Ren trial is notable as the first head-to-head trial comparing nattokinase to a statin for an atherosclerosis endpoint. The result was a positive signal favoring nattokinase over simvastatin for the plaque-burden endpoint, though replication in larger populations is needed before this can be considered established. The mechanism proposed includes plaque-fibrin dissolution (reducing intra-plaque fibrin accumulation), reduced low-density lipoprotein oxidation, and improved endothelial function.

It is important to interpret this trial with appropriate caution — the population was Chinese, the trial was relatively small, and the imaging-based endpoint (CIMT, plaque size) is a surrogate marker for clinical events rather than the events themselves. It is also not the largest trial. The Nattokinase Atherothrombotic Prevention Study (NAPS, Hodis 2021), a double-blind trial, gave 265 people of median age 65 with no cardiovascular disease either 2,000 FU of nattokinase a day or a matching placebo. After a median of 3 years, the yearly rate of change in carotid intima-media thickness and carotid artery stiffness did not differ between the groups, and nattokinase had no significant effect on blood pressure or on any laboratory measure, including clotting, clot-breakdown and inflammation markers. The authors concluded that nattokinase had a null effect on the progression of early atherosclerosis in healthy people at low cardiovascular risk.

Back to Table of Contents

Japanese Natto-Consumption Longevity Epidemiology

Japan has one of the world's longest life expectancies and one of the lowest age-adjusted cardiovascular and stroke mortality rates among developed countries. This has been observed for decades and is partially attributed to genetic factors, partially to traditional dietary patterns including high fish/omega-3 intake and lower red meat consumption, and partially to lifestyle factors. In recent decades, attention has focused on whether traditional fermented foods including natto contribute to this cardiovascular longevity, on the theory that:

  1. Natto is uniquely high in two cardiovascular-relevant bioactive compounds: nattokinase (fibrinolytic enzyme) and vitamin K2 menaquinone-7 (which regulates arterial calcification via matrix Gla protein, see the vitamin K2 connection deep-dive)
  2. Regional variation within Japan in natto consumption — eastern Japan eats much more natto than western Japan — corresponds to regional variation in cardiovascular event rates
  3. Prospective cohort studies within Japan can quantify the association between natto consumption and cardiovascular endpoints while controlling for other dietary and lifestyle variables

The principal studies are the Takayama Study, the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (JPHC), and the Kaneki 2001 paper on circulating vitamin K2 differences. The two cohort studies are described in more detail below.

Back to Table of Contents

The Takayama Study and the JPHC Cohort

The Takayama Study (Nagata 2017) is a prospective cohort of 13,355 Japanese men and 15,724 women from Takayama City, followed from 1992 onward with detailed dietary questionnaires at baseline and outcome ascertainment through national death registries. Key findings on natto consumption:

The JPHC Study (Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study; Katagiri 2020, BMJ) followed 92,915 Japanese adults aged 45 to 74 for 14.8 years. Total soy intake was not linked to total mortality, but people eating the most fermented soy (natto and miso) had about 10% lower death rates from all causes than those eating the least (hazard ratio 0.90 in men, 0.89 in women), and natto was linked to lower cardiovascular death in both men and women. The authors cautioned that the link with fermented soy might be weakened by confounding they could not adjust for.

These prospective observational data are reasonably strong epidemiologic evidence for a natto-cardiovascular protection association in the Japanese population. They do NOT prove causation — observational data never can, and unmeasured confounding by socioeconomic, regional-cultural, or healthy-eater-bias variables cannot be fully excluded. But the consistency of the findings across multiple cohorts, the dose-response relationship, and the biological plausibility based on the nattokinase + vitamin K2 dual mechanism makes the inference of causal contribution reasonable.

It is important to note that the protective effect documented in these cohorts is from natto-the-food (which delivers both nattokinase AND vitamin K2 MK-7 AND fermented soy peptides AND fiber AND other unidentified bioactives), not from isolated nattokinase supplements. Whether isolated nattokinase capsule supplementation produces the same magnitude of cardiovascular benefit in Western populations who do not eat natto as a daily food is not directly addressed by these data.

Back to Table of Contents

Ischemic vs. Hemorrhagic Stroke — Mechanism and Risk

The distinction between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke is crucial for any discussion of nattokinase in stroke prevention because the two stroke subtypes have fundamentally different pathophysiology and the intervention has opposite effects on each:

A bar split into ischemic stroke, about 87% of US strokes and caused by a clot, where nattokinase’s clot-dissolving action is protective, and hemorrhagic stroke, about 13% and caused by a ruptured vessel, where the same action is harmful and a past bleed rules it out for good. ONE ENZYME, TWO KINDS OF STROKE share of all strokes in the US · what dissolving fibrin does to each ischemic stroke · ~87% hemorrhagic · ~13% a clot blocks an artery to the brain a vessel ruptures protective breaking down fibrin works against the clot that causes it HARMFUL weakens the body’s ability to clot off the rupture past intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage: never use it poorly controlled blood pressure raises hemorrhagic risk — treat the pressure first cerebral aneurysm or AVM: not unless definitively treated OPPOSITE EFFECTS the common kind is a clot so the enzyme mostly helps the rarer kind is a bleed and there it does damage natto the food, in Japan tracks with less stroke overall that does not carry over to high-dose capsules in people with hypertension or fragile brain vessels.

The clinical implication drawn from the mechanism: nattokinase works in the protective direction for the dominant ischemic stroke subtype and is regarded as contraindicated after a hemorrhagic stroke — a personal history of intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage is listed as a permanent contraindication. People with poorly controlled hypertension are at elevated risk of hemorrhagic stroke. A case report of a brain bleed in a man taking nattokinase with aspirin is described under Cautions below.

The Japanese natto-consumption epidemiology shows reduction in both ischemic AND overall stroke mortality, which suggests that the population-level protective effect (mediated by the food natto in its long-term dietary context) outweighs any potential hemorrhagic-stroke risk in healthy adults. These food data do not tell us about high-dose isolated nattokinase supplements in people with hypertension or fragile brain blood vessels.

For more on stroke mechanisms and risk assessment, see our pages on Hypertension and Atherosclerosis.

Back to Table of Contents

The Post-COVID Spike-Protein-Fibrin Controversy

Since 2021 a substantial parallel discussion has emerged around the use of nattokinase for what is variously called "post-COVID syndrome," "long COVID," "post-vaccine syndrome," "spike-protein-induced illness," or "microclot disease." This discussion has played out largely outside the conventional medical literature, in podcasts, integrative-medicine practices, telemedicine clinics, and supplement industry promotional materials, with periodic crossover into mainstream attention via specific advocates.

The clinical premise of the discussion, as articulated by its principal advocates, is roughly:

  1. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been demonstrated (in some published reports, notably the Pretorius and Kell laboratory at Stellenbosch University) to bind fibrinogen and induce the formation of unusually resistant "fibrinaloid microclots" in plasma
  2. These microclots may persist in symptomatic post-acute COVID and post-vaccination patients and contribute to symptoms including fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, exercise intolerance, and microvascular ischemic phenomena
  3. Standard fibrinolytic mechanisms (endogenous plasmin) may be ineffective at clearing these unusual fibrinaloid structures
  4. High-dose orally-administered nattokinase, possibly in combination with other proteolytic enzymes (serrapeptase, lumbrokinase) and antiplatelet agents, may dissolve these microclots and improve symptoms

This is a contested set of claims at multiple levels. The advocates' position is presented in this section; the regulatory/academic counter-position is presented in the section after this. The honest summary is that some elements of the underlying scientific framework have peer-reviewed support, other elements are speculative, and the specific therapeutic recommendation (high-dose nattokinase for these patients) does not yet have randomized controlled trial evidence either supporting or refuting it.

Back to Table of Contents

Practitioner Protocol Claims (Contested)

Several physicians and integrative-medicine practitioners have published or promoted specific nattokinase-containing protocols for post-COVID or post-vaccination symptomatology. These include:

The arguments offered in support of these protocols include the Pretorius laboratory's published findings on spike-protein-fibrinogen interaction and microclot formation, case-series reports of symptomatic improvement in patients treated with these protocols, and the established fibrinolytic mechanism of nattokinase. The arguments are biologically coherent in the sense that "if persistent microclots exist and contribute to symptoms, and if oral nattokinase can dissolve them, then nattokinase treatment should help."

The honest framing is that neither premise is established at the level of evidence that would normally precede a confident clinical recommendation. The Pretorius microclot work is real but contested; the clinical significance of the laboratory finding is not yet established; the efficacy of oral nattokinase for clearing such structures is plausible but not demonstrated in controlled trials.

For more on one practitioner's broader detox protocol framework, see Detox and Recovery.

Back to Table of Contents

The Regulatory and Academic Counter-Position

The mainstream regulatory and academic position on nattokinase for post-COVID or post-vaccination indications is generally skeptical. The principal points of skepticism include:

The mainstream position is therefore that nattokinase for post-COVID or post-vaccination indications is an unproven intervention based on partially-validated underlying premises, and that the safety profile is generally acceptable in healthy adults but has real bleeding risks, particularly in combination protocols.

Back to Table of Contents

Where the Honest Uncertainty Lies

The post-COVID-microclot-nattokinase controversy remains open because the underlying scientific questions are genuinely unresolved. The honest summary of what is and isn't established:

What appears reasonably established:

What remains genuinely uncertain:

What is clearly unsupported:

Back to Table of Contents

Primary vs. Secondary Stroke Prevention — What the Research Reports

On the question of where nattokinase sits in stroke prevention, the evidence lines up much as it does for cardiovascular prevention generally:

A 2026 randomized, double-blind trial from China (Zhang 2026) gave 120 people with narrowed brain or neck arteries but no symptoms (asymptomatic intracranial or carotid stenosis; average age 58) either 8,000 FU of nattokinase a day or a placebo for 6 months; 88 took the capsules as required and completed follow-up. Overall memory-and-thinking scores (the Montreal Cognitive Assessment) did not differ between the groups. In an exploratory analysis, one sub-score — visuospatial function, the ability to judge shapes and space — declined less often in the nattokinase group.

The profile usually described for nattokinase use in prevention: a 50–70 year old with a family history of cardiovascular disease and one or two modifiable risk factors (mildly elevated blood pressure (BP), mildly elevated lipids, modest weight excess), no established cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, normal coagulation, not on any anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication, already making lifestyle changes, who wants an additional layer of pro-fibrinolytic and pro-cardiovascular support. The doses given in human trials were 2,000 FU/day for a median of 3 years (NAPS, healthy older adults, no effect on carotid wall thickening), 6,000 FU/day for 26 weeks (Ren 2017, compared with simvastatin) and 8,000 FU/day for 6 months (Zhang 2026, people with artery narrowing).

Back to Table of Contents

Cautions, Bleeding Risk, and Hemorrhagic Stroke Contraindication

For more on related cardiovascular and cerebrovascular considerations, see Hypertension, Atherosclerosis, and Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

  1. Suzuki Y et al. (2003). Dietary supplementation of fermented soybean, natto, suppresses intimal thickening and modulates the lysis of mural thrombi after endothelial injury in rat femoral artery. Life Sciences. — PubMed PMID: 12850244
  2. Ren NN et al. (2017). A clinical study on the effect of nattokinase on carotid artery atherosclerosis and hyperlipidaemia. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. — PubMed PMID: 28763875
  3. Nagata C et al. (2017). Dietary soy and natto intake and cardiovascular disease mortality in Japanese adults: the Takayama study. Am J Clin Nutr. — PubMed PMID: 27927636
  4. Katagiri R et al. (2020). Association of soy and fermented soy product intake with total and cause specific mortality: prospective cohort study. BMJ. — PubMed PMID: 31996350
  5. Hodis HN et al. (2021). Nattokinase atherothrombotic prevention study: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. — PubMed PMID: 33843667
  6. Zhang K et al. (2026). Nattokinase supplementation for cognitive enhancement in asymptomatic intracranial/carotid stenosis: A randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. — PubMed PMID: 41325794
  7. Chang YY et al. (2008). Cerebellar hemorrhage provoked by combined use of nattokinase and aspirin in a patient with cerebral microbleeds. Intern Med. — PubMed PMID: 18310985
  8. Chen H et al. (2018). Nattokinase: a promising alternative in prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Biomark Insights. — PubMed PMID: 30013308
  9. Pretorius E et al. (2021). Persistent clotting protein pathology in long COVID/post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Cardiovasc Diabetol. — PubMed PMID: 34425843
  10. Grobbelaar LM et al. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 induces fibrin(ogen) resistant to fibrinolysis. Biosci Rep. — PubMed PMID: 34328172
  11. Kell DB, Pretorius E (2022). The potential role of ischaemia-reperfusion injury in chronic, relapsing diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Long COVID, and ME/CFS: evidence, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications. Biochem J. — PubMed PMID: 36043493
  12. Tanikawa T et al. (2022). Degradative Effect of Nattokinase on Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2. Molecules. — PubMed PMID: 36080170
  13. Hulscher N et al. (2023). Clinical Approach to Post-acute Sequelae After COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination. Cureus. — PubMed PMID: 38024037

PubMed Topic Searches

  1. PubMed: Nattokinase stroke prevention
  2. PubMed: Nattokinase atherosclerosis
  3. PubMed: Japanese natto longevity epidemiology
  4. PubMed: Microclot / long-COVID research
  5. PubMed: Takayama/JACC natto cohort data

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents