Beets: History and Origins

History — scientific infographic poster

The beet most of us picture — a heavy, dark-crimson globe pulled from the soil — is a surprisingly recent thing. For most of its long history the beet was a leaf, not a root: a salt-tolerant seaside plant whose ancestors grew wild along the shores of the Mediterranean and the Atlantic, gathered first for their greens. The swollen, sweet, blood-red taproot we now treat as the whole point of the plant does not appear clearly in the written and pictorial record until the sixteenth century. This article traces what the historical evidence actually supports: the wild sea-beet ancestor and where it grew; the earliest mentions in ancient Mesopotamia, Greece, and Rome; how the round root finally took shape in Renaissance Europe; the eighteenth-century discovery that beets were full of ordinary sugar; and how a wartime blockade under Napoleon turned that laboratory curiosity into one of the world's great industrial crops. Beets were never invented by anyone — like every food, the plant is the product of nature and of generations of growers — so where a claim is firm we say so, and where it is folklore, a single ancient text, or still argued among scholars, we say that too.


Table of Contents

  1. The Wild Sea Beet: A Plant of the Shoreline
  2. Ancient Mentions: Mesopotamia, Greece, and Rome
  3. A Leaf Crop First: Chard and Spinach Beet
  4. The Birth of the Round Root: Renaissance Europe
  5. Sugar in the Beet: Marggraf, Achard, and Napoleon
  6. Spread and Culinary Traditions
  7. From Folk Tonic to Modern Research
  8. Genes Redraw the Beet Family Tree
  9. Key Research Papers
  10. Connections
  11. Featured Videos

The Wild Sea Beet: A Plant of the Shoreline

Every beet on earth — the dark salad beetroot, the pale sugar beet, the rainbow-stemmed chard, the cattle-feed mangel — descends from a single wild plant, the sea beet, known botanically as Beta vulgaris subspecies maritima. It is a tough, sprawling, salt-tolerant herb that grows wild along coastlines and in disturbed ground, and its natural range is wide: the shores of the Mediterranean, up the Atlantic coast of Europe as far as Scandinavia, and eastward through the Middle East into India, Iran, and the Caucasus. This is a plant built for hard places — sand, salt spray, and stony soil — and that hardiness is part of why people across so many regions came to know it.

Botanically the beet sits in the family Amaranthaceae (older books place it in the Chenopodiaceae, the goosefoot family), which makes it a relative not of the carrot or the turnip but of spinach, chard, and quinoa. One feature of the wild sea beet matters a great deal for the story that follows: its root contains extra rings of growth tissue, called supernumerary cambia. In most of its wild forms the root stays thin and woody, but that unusual internal anatomy gave later growers something to work with — the raw material from which, after many centuries of selection, a fat storage root could eventually be coaxed.

The honest summary is that the beet is native to a broad arid-and-coastal belt of the Old World, not to any single country, and that its earliest human use was as a wild gathered green. Where it was first deliberately cultivated is generally placed in the Mediterranean region, but the wild plant's sheer geographic spread means several ancient cultures could have come to know it independently.

Back to Table of Contents

Ancient Mentions: Mesopotamia, Greece, and Rome

The beet has a genuinely ancient paper trail, though it is a modest one. The earliest reasonably secure written mention is usually traced to Mesopotamia in roughly the eighth century BC; the botanists Daniel Zohary and Maria Hopf, in their standard reference on the domestication of Old World plants, note that the beet is "linguistically well identified" in records from this period. A frequently repeated claim that beets grew in the Hanging Gardens of Babylon around 800 BC is open to doubt — the Hanging Gardens themselves may never have existed in the form later writers described — but the broader point stands: people in the ancient Near East knew the plant.

In the classical Mediterranean, beets appear in both medical and culinary writing, and here a crucial detail is easy to miss: the ancients were almost always talking about the leaves, not the round root we know today. The Greek physician Dioscorides, writing in the first century AD, described pale and dark forms of beet and recommended them for a range of ailments — the white kind to loosen the bowels, the dark kind to bind them, with further uses for earache and for scalp complaints. Roman writers likewise valued the plant mostly as a pot-herb and a gentle medicine, used as a mild laxative or in the treatment of fevers, rather than as a substantial vegetable in its own right.

Beets also turn up in the most famous of Roman cookery collections, the recipe book known as De re coquinaria that travels under the name of Apicius. The name points to Marcus Gavius Apicius, a Roman gourmet of the first century AD, but the surviving text is a later compilation assembled toward the end of the Roman era, so it is best read as a Roman culinary tradition bearing his name rather than the work of one author. Its beet recipes include beets sliced with leeks, crushed coriander and cumin, and raisin wine, boiled down and served with oil and vinegar; others cook beets with mustard or pickle them in oil and vinegar. Goldman and Janick, who quote these recipes, do not say which part of the plant they used. They report that wild forms were eaten in antiquity mainly for their leaves, with roots used medicinally, and that in this period the small root was boiled and cooked before eating. The clear thread through all of this is that classical antiquity prized the beet as a leaf and a remedy, and that the heavy sweet root of the modern garden was not yet on the table.

Beets also appear in other ancient writings. Goldman and Janick report that the beet is referred to in the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the first five books of the Hebrew Bible made in Egypt in the third century BC, and in several tractates of the Talmud; one talmudic recipe recommends celebrating a festive day with a dish of beets, a large fish, and heads of garlic. The first illustrated version of Dioscorides, the Juliana Anicia Codex of AD 512, shows a beet with a non-spherical root.

Back to Table of Contents

A Leaf Crop First: Chard and Spinach Beet

Because the wild sea beet was gathered for its greens, the first crops people bred from it were leaf crops. Selecting the plants with the largest, most tender foliage and the broadest, fleshiest leaf-stalks gradually produced what we now call chard (also Swiss chard, leaf beet, or silverbeet) and the closely related spinach beet. These are not separate species but cultivated forms of the very same plant, Beta vulgaris — a beet bred for its top rather than its bottom. The leaf-beet group has a long pedigree, with its roots in selections made in the Mediterranean world well before the swollen-rooted forms existed.

This is why the beet's closest kitchen relatives are leafy: chard is, quite literally, a beet, and spinach belongs to the same plant family. For most of recorded history a "beet" in the garden or on the plate would have meant these greens and their thick midribs, simmered as a pot-herb. The familiar globe beetroot is a latecomer that branched off from this older leafy lineage once growers began, much later, to push the plant's selection in an entirely different direction — downward, into the root.

Back to Table of Contents

The Birth of the Round Root: Renaissance Europe

The most striking fact in the beet's history is how late the beetroot itself arrives. According to a detailed study of the plant's images and texts by the horticultural historians Irwin Goldman and Jules Janick, swollen-rooted forms "with a more substantial, spherical root do not appear to be documented until the early 16th century." The same authors add that selection for swollen roots may have taken place centuries earlier, although no images show such roots before that time. The University of Oxford's Plants 400 profile gives an earlier date, saying beetroots started to appear about 500 BCE, with their precise origin unknown, so the sources differ. Earlier forms had thin, often conical roots; the substantial, rounded, deep-red root we now take for granted is essentially a Renaissance European development, refined over the following centuries.

The evidence for this is pictorial as much as textual. Goldman and Janick point to the first colored illustration of a swollen-rooted table beet in the frescoes of the Villa Farnesina in Rome, painted around 1515–1517; to Luigi Squalermo, whose De simplicibus of 1561 described a beet from Greece with bright red, round roots like a turnip; and to later sixteenth-century herbals such as that of Jacques Dalechamps (1587), which show the rounder root becoming established. The conical form did not vanish quickly: conical roots still appear in a seventeenth-century market painting by Franz Snijders, various spherical forms in the work of the American painter James Peale in 1826, a complete array of root types in the Benary catalog of 1876, and modern spherical roots in a 1936 painting by a Russian artist. Goldman and Janick conclude that conical roots were gradually replaced by spherical ones over the past five centuries. The domestication of the storage root, in other words, happened after the plant had spread well beyond the Mediterranean — largely in Europe, and largely in the modern era rather than in antiquity.

It is worth saying plainly that this corrects a common impression. Beets are genuinely ancient as a cultivated plant, but the blood-red root — the thing a modern cook means by "a beet" — is only a few centuries old. Those rounded European garden beets gave us today's table beetroot. The older account also has them giving rise, as growers selected for other traits, to the pale fodder beets and, eventually, the sugar beet that would change the plant's economic fortunes entirely; newer genetic work, described below, questions that line of descent.

Back to Table of Contents

Sugar in the Beet: Marggraf, Achard, and Napoleon

By the eighteenth century the European beet had been bred into fat-rooted garden and fodder forms, and people had long noticed that beets taste sweet. The decisive step came in 1747, when the Prussian chemist Andreas Sigismund Marggraf, working at the Berlin Academy of Sciences, showed that the sweetness was not merely beet-flavoured but was actual sucrose — the same sugar then obtained only from tropical sugar cane. Using alcohol to extract and crystallise it, he demonstrated that beet sugar and cane sugar were chemically the same substance, finding it in his beets at concentrations of only around 1.3 to 1.6 percent. This was the genuine discovery in the beet's story: a named chemist, a verifiable date, and a specific finding. Marggraf treated it, accurately enough for his time, as a laboratory result with no obvious commercial future.

Turning that finding into an industry fell to Marggraf's pupil, the chemist Franz Karl Achard. Beginning in the 1780s, Achard set about selectively breeding beets to raise their sugar content well above the levels Marggraf had measured, working in particular with a white Silesian fodder beet. In 1801–1802, with the backing of King Frederick William III of Prussia, he opened what is generally credited as the world's first beet-sugar factory at Cunern (Kunern) in Silesia — today Konary, in Poland. The technology was crude and barely profitable, and it might have languished there.

What rescued it was war. During the Napoleonic Wars, the British naval blockade and Napoleon's answering Continental System choked off cane sugar imports to continental Europe. Cut off from Caribbean sugar, France threw its weight behind the home-grown alternative: Napoleon promoted the crop directly, dedicating tens of thousands of hectares to sugar beet and supporting schools and factories to develop it. The result was explosive — the number of French beet-sugar works grew from a handful to several hundred within a few years around 1811–1813. When the blockade lifted and cheap cane sugar returned, beet sugar had nonetheless put down permanent roots in European agriculture. Within a century of the first breeding efforts, according to Goldman and Janick, sucrose concentrations "more than quadrupled," and more than 275 million tons of sugar beet were produced worldwide in 2019. Today the sugar beet is one of the world's major sugar crops. It was long thought to descend directly from those Renaissance-era European root beets, but a 2026 genetic study reports that garden beet and sugar beet are actually distantly related.

Back to Table of Contents

Spread and Culinary Traditions

As the rounded red root spread through Europe from the sixteenth century onward, it settled deeply into regional cooking — above all in the colder lands where it stored well through winter. The most famous dish is borscht, the beet soup of Ukraine and the wider region of Eastern Europe, served hot or cold and often finished with sour cream; in 2022 UNESCO inscribed the culture of Ukrainian borscht cooking on its list of intangible cultural heritage in need of urgent safeguarding. Pickled beets, beet relishes, and fermented preparations such as beet kvass became staples of Eastern and Central European tables, prized partly because pickling and fermentation kept the harvest edible long past autumn.

The beet travelled with Europeans to the Americas and beyond as a garden and field crop, and its uses multiplied: a sweet salad root, a source of betanin used as a natural red food colouring, a livestock feed in its mangel form, and an industrial sugar source in its sugar-beet form. Different cultures emphasised different parts — the root in much of Europe, but the leaves and stalks (as chard) all around the Mediterranean and in parts of Asia — so that a single species came to occupy several quite distinct culinary niches. By the modern era the beet had completed an unlikely journey: from a wild seaside green, to an ancient leaf crop, to a Renaissance garden root, to a global vegetable, dye, fodder, and sweetener all at once.

Back to Table of Contents

From Folk Tonic to Modern Research

Running quietly through all of this is the beet's reputation as a healthful food. The ancient medical uses recorded by Dioscorides and the Romans were modest and specific — a mild laxative, a remedy for minor complaints — and beet juice later acquired a folk reputation as a "blood tonic," encouraged no doubt by its deep red colour. These are best understood as history, not as medical advice: a long tradition of use tells us a plant was valued and worth investigating, not that any particular health claim has been proven.

What is striking is that modern science has, in part, circled back to the beet. Researchers have shown that the root is unusually rich in dietary nitrate, which the body converts into nitric oxide — a molecule that relaxes blood vessels. A widely cited 2008 study in the journal Hypertension, by Andrew Webb and colleagues, found that drinking beetroot juice lowered blood pressure in healthy volunteers, helping to launch a large body of contemporary research into beets and cardiovascular and exercise performance. That work, and the evidence behind it, is covered in detail on the companion Beets Benefits articles and on the main Beets page; this history is concerned only with how the beet came to be grown and eaten in the first place. The thread from a wild shoreline green, to a Renaissance garden root, to a juice studied in a modern laboratory is unbroken — and following it honestly is the point of knowing the history at all.

Back to Table of Contents

Genes Redraw the Beet Family Tree

The garden beet has traditionally been considered the ancestor of the sugar beet, but DNA studies now point elsewhere. A 2026 study in BMC Plant Biology measured 15 root traits in 622 plants from 74 garden beet and 7 sugar beet accessions (seed collections). Garden beets with conical roots grouped with the sugar beet, while those with globular roots, along with some other shapes such as cylindrical, formed a separate group, and DNA analysis supported the split. The authors conclude that the globular garden beet is likely a distinct lineage, and they favor the idea that it and the sugar beet both arose from a genetically mixed population that was the common ancestor of root-type beets. They present this as a favored hypothesis rather than a settled fact.

A 2025 analysis in iScience used a machine-learning method on hundreds of sequenced beets and found DNA variants that told wild plants from domesticated ones at a mean accuracy of 98.4%. The genes tied to those variants are involved in sugar storage and transport, resistance to nematodes (microscopic root worms), and root growth.

Goldman and Janick also place the other crop types differently from the older account: mangel is likely derived from crosses between table beet and chard, and fodder beet may have a more recent origin, from crosses between mangel and sugar beet.

Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

The list below combines peer-reviewed sources on the history, domestication, and botany of Beta vulgaris with reputable food-history references and curated PubMed topic-search links. Historical primary sources (the writings of Dioscorides and the Roman recipe collection bearing the name of Apicius) are named in the article as historical sources rather than as modern citations. Author names, titles, and journals are given as plain text; only the stable DOI, PMID, or archive link is hyperlinked, and each opens in a new tab.

  1. Goldman IL, Janick J. Evolution of root morphology in table beet: historical and iconographic. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:689926. — doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.689926 (also — PubMed PMID: 34447400)
  2. Webb AJ, Patel N, Loukogeorgakis S, et al. Acute blood pressure lowering, vasoprotective, and antiplatelet properties of dietary nitrate via bioconversion to nitrite. Hypertension. 2008;51(3):784-790. — doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.103523 (also — PubMed PMID: 18250365)
  3. Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E. Domestication of Plants in the Old World (4th ed.) Oxford University Press; 2012. — Standard reference identifying the eighth-century-BC Mesopotamian written record of the beet.
  4. Frese L, Desprez B, Ziegler D. Potential of genetic resources and breeding strategies for base-broadening in Beta. In: Broadening the Genetic Base of Crop Production. CABI; 2001. — On the wild Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima gene pool and crop relationships.
  5. Hayakawa R, Taniguchi E, Oishi M, Nishimura S, Matsuhira H, Narihiro T, Kuroda Y, Kubo T, Kitazaki K. Globular garden beet represents a distinct lineage in the domestication of Beta vulgaris. BMC Plant Biology. 2026;26(1):216. — PubMed PMID: 41491682
  6. Sandell FL, Rupprecht C, Himmelbauer H, Dohm JC. Variation analysis using random forests reveals domestication patterns and breeding trends in sugar beet. iScience. 2025;28(8):112835. — PubMed PMID: 40740499

PubMed Topic Searches

  1. PubMed: sugar beet history and sucrose

External Authoritative Resources

  1. Encyclopaedic overview — Beta vulgaris
  2. University of Oxford, Plants 400 — Beta (beet) profile
  3. The Sugar Association — the story of sugar beets

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents