Manuka Honey and the MGO / UMF Rating System

Manuka and MGO Rating — scientific infographic poster

Manuka honey is the only honey in commercial production whose antibacterial potency is high enough and chemically distinct enough to support a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-cleared medical device and a multi-billion-dollar global premium market. The dominant active compound is methylglyoxal (MGO), a small alpha-oxoaldehyde present at 50 to over 1,200 mg/kg in authentic Manuka and at only 1-10 mg/kg in ordinary honey — up to 100-fold higher than conventional honeys in the measurements of Mavric and colleagues (2008). Three competing label systems (MGO mg/kg, UMF Unique Manuka Factor, and NPA Non-Peroxide Activity) all measure essentially the same thing, but the proliferation of proprietary activity ratings not tied to measured methylglyoxal has made the Manuka shelf one of the most confusing in the food and supplement category. This page walks through the chemistry, the rating systems, the New Zealand MPI scientific definition that distinguishes real Manuka from fraud, and the MGO strengths used for different applications.


Table of Contents

  1. Where Manuka Comes From: Leptospermum scoparium
  2. The DHA-to-MGO Conversion in the Honey Jar
  3. Mechanism: How MGO Kills Bacteria
  4. The Three Rating Systems (MGO, UMF, NPA)
  5. The New Zealand MPI Scientific Definition
  6. MGO Strengths Used for Different Applications
  7. Fraud and Watered-Down Manuka
  8. Australian vs New Zealand Manuka
  9. Cautions
  10. Key Research Papers
  11. Connections
  12. Featured Videos

Where Manuka Comes From: Leptospermum scoparium

Manuka honey is the product of European honey bees (Apis mellifera) foraging on the nectar of Leptospermum scoparium, a small flowering shrub in the Myrtaceae family native to New Zealand and southeastern Australia. The plant is known as manuka or tea tree (not to be confused with Melaleuca alternifolia, the Australian tea tree from which tea tree oil is extracted). It grows abundantly on hillsides, in regenerating clearcut forest, and in scrub margins across both islands of New Zealand and parts of Tasmania, Victoria, and New South Wales.

The flowering window is narrow — typically 2 to 6 weeks in mid to late summer (December-February in the Southern Hemisphere). Beekeepers truck their hives into manuka stands for the duration of the bloom and pull them out as soon as the manuka is finished, before the bees can backfill the same combs with nectar from other plants. The intensity of manuka flowering in any given year is weather-dependent and unpredictable, which is the primary supply constraint that keeps prices high.

The nectar itself is not what is bactericidal. The active antibacterial precursor in nectar is dihydroxyacetone (DHA), a simple three-carbon ketose. DHA concentration in fresh manuka nectar varies dramatically by individual plant genetics, year, and location — this is why two jars of honest, authentic Manuka can have vastly different MGO ratings.

Back to Table of Contents

The DHA-to-MGO Conversion in the Honey Jar

The Adams 2009 paper (Carbohydrate Research) established the precise chemical pathway that distinguishes Manuka from all other honeys. The bees collect manuka nectar, transport it to the hive, and process it normally — reducing water content, adding enzymes, sealing the comb. Fresh-harvested Manuka honey contains high DHA but only modest MGO. Over the next 6 to 12 months in the jar at ambient temperature, DHA undergoes spontaneous non-enzymatic dehydration to methylglyoxal:

Dihydroxyacetone (DHA) → Methylglyoxal (MGO) + H2O

This is a slow chemical process — not a fermentation, not enzymatic, simply a temperature-dependent dehydration reaction in a highly concentrated acidic sugar matrix. The conversion accelerates at warmer storage temperatures (37°C produces near-complete conversion in weeks; 4°C nearly halts it). Commercial Manuka producers typically warm-store fresh honey at controlled elevated temperatures (around 27-37°C) for several months to drive the conversion before bottling. The final MGO level is essentially fixed by the starting DHA concentration in the nectar — you cannot make a 100+ MGO honey into a 500+ by storing it longer.

This explains several otherwise puzzling features of the Manuka market:

Back to Table of Contents

Mechanism: How MGO Kills Bacteria

Methylglyoxal is a reactive electrophile — one of the most reactive small molecules in human biology. It is also produced endogenously as a side-reaction of glycolysis (which is why every aerobic organism has a glyoxalase detoxification system to scavenge it). At the concentrations present in even modestly-rated Manuka (100+ mg/kg = 100+ ppm), MGO produces sustained, broad-spectrum bactericidal activity through several overlapping mechanisms:

An important note on resistance: extensive in vitro work has failed to produce stable MGO-resistant mutants of clinically important bacteria. The proposed reason is that MGO acts through multiple non-specific protein and DNA targets simultaneously, leaving no single target for resistance mutations to address. This is in contrast to most antibiotics that target a single enzyme or pathway. The practical implication: Manuka and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Manuka and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Manuka and Enterococcus, Manuka and ESBL-producing E. coli all show consistent in-vitro and in-vivo kill curves even when the same organisms are resistant to most pharmacy antibiotics. See the Wound Healing page for the topical applications this enables.

Back to Table of Contents

The Three Rating Systems (MGO, UMF, NPA)

Three rating systems coexist on the Manuka shelf. They measure essentially the same property in different ways:

The minimum MGO levels in the UMF Honey Association grading table:

Some products use proprietary activity ratings that are not standardized scientific measurements and are not tied to measured methylglyoxal. If a jar does not show one of the three real ratings (MGO, UMF, or NPA), there is no way to compare its potency against anything else.

Back to Table of Contents

The New Zealand MPI Scientific Definition

Authentic monofloral Manuka honey was for years defined only by pollen content (melissopalynology), which was easy to fake and easy to dispute. In 2018, the New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) introduced a science-based regulatory definition that all honey exported from New Zealand and labeled "Manuka" must meet. The MPI definition requires five tests:

  1. 3-phenyllactic acid ≥ 400 mg/kg (monofloral) or ≥ 20 mg/kg (multifloral)
  2. 2'-methoxyacetophenone ≥ 5 mg/kg
  3. 2-methoxybenzoic acid ≥ 1 mg/kg
  4. 4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid ≥ 1 mg/kg
  5. DNA from Leptospermum scoparium — less than Cq 36 in a qPCR assay

All five tests must pass for "monofloral Manuka" certification. The thresholds were calibrated against known authentic Manuka samples and are difficult to fake by spiking with synthetic DHA, syrup adulteration, or pollen contamination. The MPI label on a jar (typically as an export certificate number or a "Made in New Zealand" mark backed by MPI testing) is the strongest single signal of authenticity available to consumers.

Australian Manuka honey (from Tasmanian and Victorian Leptospermum scoparium as well as several closely related Australian Leptospermum species) is not covered by the MPI definition. The Australian Manuka Honey Association (AMHA) maintains a parallel standard, but the New Zealand industry contests the use of the word "Manuka" by Australian producers in international markets. From a chemical and clinical-efficacy standpoint, both sources produce high-MGO honey.

Back to Table of Contents

MGO Strengths Used for Different Applications

The general pattern: lower MGO grades are sold for oral use, higher MGO grades for topical wound use.

Back to Table of Contents

Fraud and Watered-Down Manuka

The Manuka market has historically been plagued by fraud. Global sales of products labeled "Manuka" routinely exceed the entire New Zealand annual harvest by 3-to-1 or more — meaning the majority of jars on global shelves at any given time are partly or wholly counterfeit. Features that distinguish authentic product:

For a deeper discussion of raw vs pasteurized labeling and other honey label terms, see the separate page in this Benefits hub.

Back to Table of Contents

Australian vs New Zealand Manuka

Australian Leptospermum honey is chemically equivalent to New Zealand Manuka in terms of MGO content and antibacterial activity. The dispute is about the word "Manuka" itself, which has Maori linguistic and cultural roots in New Zealand and which the New Zealand industry has sought to protect as a geographical indication (analogous to "Champagne" or "Roquefort" in Europe).

From a clinical/therapeutic standpoint, an MGO-400 honey from Tasmania or Victoria is interchangeable with an MGO-400 honey from the Coromandel Peninsula. From a fraud-defense standpoint, the New Zealand product currently has the more developed regulatory framework (MPI five-test definition + UMF certification), and the Australian framework (AMHA) is newer. Honey labeled "Manuka" from countries with no Leptospermum trees cannot be genuine Manuka.

Back to Table of Contents

Cautions

Back to Table of Contents

Key Research Papers

  1. Mavric E, Wittmann S, Barth G, Henle T (2008). Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 52(4):483-9 — PubMed PMID: 18210383
  2. Adams CJ, Manley-Harris M, Molan PC (2009). The origin of methylglyoxal in New Zealand manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey. Carbohydrate Research. 344(8):1050-3 — PubMed PMID: 19368902
  3. Adams CJ et al. (2008). Isolation by HPLC and characterisation of the bioactive fraction of New Zealand manuka honey. Carbohydrate Research — PubMed PMID: 18194804
  4. Allen KL, Molan PC, Reid GM (1991). A survey of the antibacterial activity of some New Zealand honeys. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 43(12):817-22 — PubMed PMID: 1687577
  5. Molan PC (1992). The antibacterial activity of honey: the nature of the antibacterial activity. Bee World. PubMed: Molan 1992
  6. Atrott J, Henle T (2009). Methylglyoxal in Manuka honey — correlation with antibacterial properties. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. PubMed: Atrott-Henle 2009
  7. Stephens JM et al. (2010). Phenolic compounds and methylglyoxal in some New Zealand manuka and kanuka honeys. Food Chemistry. PubMed: Stephens 2010
  8. Maeda Y et al. (2008). Antibacterial activity of honey against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 14(2):77-82 — PubMed PMID: 18396250
  9. Maddocks SE et al. (2012). Manuka honey inhibits the development of Streptococcus pyogenes biofilms and causes reduced expression of two fibronectin binding proteins. Microbiology. 158(Pt 3):781-790 — PubMed PMID: 22294681
  10. Carter DA et al. (2016). Therapeutic Manuka Honey: No Longer So Alternative (review). Frontiers in Microbiology — PubMed PMID: 27148246
  11. Roberts AEL, Maddocks SE, Cooper RA (2015). Manuka honey reduces the motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PubMed PMID: 25404649
  12. Alandejani T, Marsan J, Ferris W, Slinger R, Chan F (2009). Effectiveness of honey on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 141(1):114-8 — PubMed PMID: 19559969
  13. Breyer V, Frischmann M, Bidmon C, Schemm A, Schiebel K, Pischetsrieder M (2008). Analysis and biological relevance of advanced glycation end-products of DNA in eukaryotic cells. FEBS Journal. 275(5):914-25 — PubMed PMID: 18215162
  14. Cokcetin NN et al. (2016). The antibacterial activity of Australian Leptospermum honey correlates with methylglyoxal levels. PLOS ONE — PubMed PMID: 28030589

PubMed Topic Searches

  1. PubMed: MGO and Manuka antibacterial
  2. PubMed: Manuka and MRSA wound
  3. PubMed: Manuka and biofilms
  4. PubMed: Leptospermum nectar DHA
  5. PubMed: UMF rating

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents