Gallstone Pain: What Trials Found on Surgery Versus Watchful Waiting

Removing the gallbladder is the standard answer to gallstone pain, and it is one of the most common elective operations in the United Kingdom's National Health Service. Until recently, only two small randomized trials had tested it against simply watching and waiting. A larger trial published in 2023 found no difference in bodily pain over 18 months between the two groups, and two other kinds of result sit beside that finding. Over the long term, people randomized to surgery had fewer gallstone attacks and complications in the pooled trials, and a large share of people still report abdominal pain after the operation. This page goes through the numbers, trial by trial. For what gallstones are and how they cause pain, see the main Gallstones page.

Table of Contents

  1. Silent Stones and Painful Stones
  2. How Often the Pain Returns Without Surgery
  3. The C-GALL Trial
  4. The 14-Year Randomized Trials
  5. The SECURE Trial
  6. What the Pooled Analyses Report
  7. Pain After Gallbladder Removal
  8. Features Linked With Relief After Surgery
  9. Complication Rates on Each Path
  10. Treating an Attack: The Pain-Relief Trials
  11. What the Trials Report on Costs
  12. What the Guidelines State
  13. Stones Found by Chance
  14. Limits of the Evidence
  15. Who the Trials Left Out, and Signs Hospitals Treat as Urgent
  16. Key Research Papers
  17. Connections
  18. Featured Videos

Silent Stones and Painful Stones

The word "gallstones" covers two quite different situations, and the research treats them separately.

Trials of surgery against waiting study a narrower group within the second category: people with "uncomplicated" symptomatic stones. That means pain, without a stone blocking the bile duct, without jaundice and without pancreatitis. The trials draw the line a little differently: C-GALL counted people electively referred after biliary colic or acute cholecystitis, while SECURE treated cholecystitis as a complication and left it out. Whether people with these complications benefit from surgery is a separate question, and the trials on this page do not answer it.

The operation itself is called a cholecystectomy, the removal of the gallbladder. It is normally done laparoscopically, through small keyhole cuts. "Conservative management" or "observation" in these trials means no planned operation. In the C-GALL trial it was care by the patient and their general practitioner, which might include dietary advice and pain management, with surgery if needed (Innes 2024). Participants also received a leaflet on what to do if symptoms flared up (Ahmed 2023).

How Often the Pain Returns Without Surgery

A person who has had one gallstone attack is more likely to have another than a person with silent stones, but many have no further attacks for long stretches. Several studies have followed people who were not operated on.

These sources do not fully agree, and part of the reason is design. Population screening can find people with milder disease than a surgical clinic sees. The Italian study relied on questionnaires, and the placebo group was made up of people who had chosen a non-surgical route.

The C-GALL Trial

C-GALL is a direct test of surgery against conservative management in uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones. It took place at 20 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Of 2,667 people assessed, 434 were randomized between 2016 and 2019, half to each group (Ahmed 2023). Their mean age was 50 to 51 years and 79% were women.

The main measure was bodily pain over 18 months, scored on a standard 36-question health survey (Short Form-36), on a scale where the general population averages 50.

That last point matters when reading the headline result. A general pain score did not separate the groups, while a questionnaire built for gallstone problems did. The plain-language summary of the trial says that participants in the surgery group reported fewer ongoing problems related to their gallstone disease or after surgery.

How many people actually had each treatment

Random assignment did not fix what happened next. By 24 months, 64 people (29.5%) in the conservative group and 153 (70.5%) in the surgery group had been operated on (Innes 2024). Among the 153 conservative-group participants with no operation by 24 months, 131 were not on a waiting list and 15 were. Of the 64 people assigned to surgery who had not had it, 33 had declined (Ahmed 2023). Among those operated on, median time to surgery was 4.7 months in the surgery group and 9.0 months in the conservative group (Innes 2024). The trial's sensitivity analyses suggested the waiting list was unlikely to bias the result, but the authors note that it may limit how well the findings apply in countries with shorter waits.

The authors conclude that in the short term, up to 18 months, laparoscopic surgery was no more effective than conservative management. They call for longer follow-up and for work to identify which people benefit most from an operation.

The 14-Year Randomized Trials

Before C-GALL, two small trials from one research group in Norway were the main randomized evidence. They have the longest follow-up of any trial on this page.

Uncomplicated symptomatic stones

Of 338 people considered, 137 were randomized to cholecystectomy (68) or observation (69). After a median of 67 months, 35 of the 69 in the observation group had had their gallbladders removed, and 8 of those assigned to surgery had not. Gallstone complications occurred in 3 people in the observation group and 1 in the operation group. The authors concluded at that point that watchful waiting carried a low risk of complications (Vetrhus 2002).

At 14 years the same trial reported no difference between groups in symptomatic events or major complications (p = 0.298). By then 50.7% of the observation group and 88.2% of the surgery group had been operated on. Virtually no operations took place after 5 years, and no clear escalation in disease severity was seen. The surgery group completed its assigned treatment significantly more often (p < 0.001). The authors' conclusion had shifted: they described cholecystectomy as the preferred treatment, with conservative management an alternative in the elderly (Schmidt 2011, Digestive Surgery).

Acute cholecystitis

The companion trial randomized 64 people who had already had an episode of acute cholecystitis, a gallbladder infection or inflammation. After a median of 67 months, gallstone complications or emergency admissions for pain occurred in 36% of the observation group and 19% of the operation group (Vetrhus 2003). At 14 years, 11 of the 33 people in the observation group (33%) had a new gallstone event, 8 (24.2%) had recurrent cholecystitis, and 11 (33%) had been operated on. The groups did not differ significantly in recurrent disease or complications, and long-term mortality was equal (Schmidt 2011, acute cholecystitis follow-up).

The SECURE Trial

SECURE, in 24 Dutch hospitals, asked a different question: does applying strict criteria for who gets surgery change results? It enrolled 1,067 people with abdominal pain and stones or sludge on ultrasound. One group had usual care, where the surgeon decided. In the other, surgery was advised only if a person met all five criteria: severe attacks, pain lasting 15 to 30 minutes or longer, pain in the upper middle or upper right abdomen, pain radiating to the back, and a positive response to simple painkillers (van Dijk 2019).

SECURE did not include a true no-surgery group, so it cannot compare an operation with waiting. Its results describe pain after surgery and show that strict symptom criteria produced a significant but small drop in operations. The authors called for better selection criteria and for "rethinking laparoscopic cholecystectomy as treatment" to improve what patients report.

What the Pooled Analyses Report

Several reviews combine the trials, and they include different trials under the same heading. Their results favor surgery on gallstone events. On surgical harms, some favor waiting and some find no significant difference.

A relative risk of 0.40 means 40% of the rate in the comparison group; 3.63 means about 3.6 times the rate. Those figures can sound large for events that are uncommon, and the reviews' abstracts mostly give relative rather than absolute numbers. The two most recent reviews also disagree on bile duct stones, which shows how much depends on which trials are counted.

Pain After Gallbladder Removal

Surgery removes the stones and the organ where they form. It does not always remove the pain, and several prospective studies have tried to measure how often this happens.

"Pain-free" and "better" are different results. In one Dutch cohort, 59.2% reported no pain at 24 weeks while about 90% reported general improvement and a positive result of surgery (Wennmacker 2017). In another study, pain was cured or improved in about 90% and two-thirds had complete symptom relief (Schmidt 2012).

New symptoms

In the 820-person analysis, the most common new symptoms at 6 months were frequent bowel movements (9.6%), bowel urgency (8.5%) and diarrhea (8.4%). Flatulence (17.8%) and restricted eating (14.5%) were the symptoms that most often persisted (Thunnissen 2023).

Features Linked With Relief After Surgery

Researchers have looked for features that separate people likely to gain from those who are not. These are links found in groups, and they do not predict the result for any one person.

A 2023 review concluded that strategies for selecting people for surgery based on symptoms alone "are exhausted" and called for studies of objective markers (Shabanzadeh 2023).

Complication Rates on Each Path

The risks of the operation

The risks inside the trials

By 18 months in C-GALL, 32 people (15%) in the conservative group and 44 (20%) in the surgery group had a complication (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 1.14), not a statistically significant difference. The kinds differed. Complications before surgery, mostly cholecystitis or biliary colic, affected 25 people (12%) in the conservative group and 11 (5%) in the surgery group. Complications during surgery, mostly bile or stone spillage, affected 9 (4%) and 24 (11%). One cardiovascular death occurred in the surgery group. Further treatment was needed by 5% and 6% (Ahmed 2023).

In the older trial, 16 of 222 people who had a cholecystectomy had a major complication and 10 a minor one (Vetrhus 2002). In SECURE, gallstone complications affected about 7 to 8% of each arm and surgical complications about 21 to 22% of those operated, at 12 months (van Dijk 2019).

The risks of waiting

Treating an Attack: The Pain-Relief Trials

Choosing not to operate means some people will face further attacks, so the trials of pain relief bear on the question. A 2016 Cochrane review collected 12 randomized trials with 828 people, all admitted to emergency departments with acute biliary pain (Fraquelli 2016).

Only one of the 12 trials was at low risk of bias, and none measured quality of life.

What the Trials Report on Costs

These figures describe costs to health systems and societies, not what an individual pays.

What the Guidelines State

Guideline wording is reported here as a fact about the guideline. All three below were published before the C-GALL results appeared in December 2023.

Of these three, the Danish society lists observation as an option, while the other two keep surgery as the standard for symptomatic stones. The 2019 SECURE paper describes international guidelines as advising surgery for symptomatic, uncomplicated stones, and the C-GALL authors write that a discussion of conservative management belongs in the decision and consent process.

Stones Found by Chance

A Cochrane search through 2006 found no randomized trial of surgery against no surgery for silent stones (Gurusamy 2007). What is known comes from following people over time.

The Japanese guideline's commentary gives rates for silent stones of 0.3% for acute cholecystitis, 0.2% for obstructive jaundice and 0.04 to 1.5% for pancreatitis (Fujita 2023).

Preventive surgery

A 1983 decision analysis, using the operation death rates of that time, calculated that preventive surgery slightly shortened survival: on average 4 days of life lost for a 30-year-old man and 18 days for a 50-year-old man (Ransohoff 1983). A 2023 systematic review concluded that most evidence points to the safety and feasibility of follow-up for silent stones, while the authors favored preventive surgery after heart transplantation and in people with very small stones (microlithiasis) and low surgical risk, on limited evidence (Alves 2023).

Gallbladder cancer

Cancer risk is part of the discussion about silent stones. Cohort data link the two: in 396,720 South Koreans, people with gallstones had a higher rate of gallbladder cancer death than people without them (hazard ratio 7.35, 95% confidence interval 2.60 to 20.8). This rested on only 20 such deaths among all participants, and cholecystectomy was not significantly linked with cancer death from the liver and bile ducts (Ryu 2016). The Japanese guideline reports the incidence of gallbladder cancer from silent stones as rare, at 0 to 0.5%. It names stones larger than 3 cm, polyps larger than 10 mm, porcelain gallbladder, thickened gallbladder walls and stone-filled gallbladders as high-risk groups (Fujita 2023). There is more on the Gallbladder Cancer page.

Limits of the Evidence

Who the Trials Left Out, and Signs Hospitals Treat as Urgent

None of the waiting data above applies to everyone with stones. C-GALL excluded people with stones in the common bile duct or evidence of past ones, a history of acute pancreatitis, obstructive jaundice, a gallbladder full of pus with sepsis, a perforated gallbladder, suspected gallbladder cancer or hemolytic disease, as well as people who were pregnant or medically unfit for surgery (Ahmed 2023).

These complications behave differently from uncomplicated colic. The signs hospitals treat as urgent are severe abdominal pain lasting several hours, abdominal pain with fever or chills, yellowing of the skin or eyes, dark urine or pale stools, and persistent vomiting. They can signal a blocked duct, infection or pancreatitis, and they are described on the main Gallstones page and the pages for acute cholecystitis, cholangitis and pancreatitis.

Key Research Papers

  1. Innes K, Ahmed I, Hudson J, Hernández R, Gillies K, Bruce R, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 2024;28(26):1-151. PubMed PMID: 38943314
  2. Fujita N, Yasuda I, Endo I, Isayama H, Iwashita T, Ueki T, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2023;58(9):801-833. PubMed PMID: 37452855
  3. Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Conte D, Colli A. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs for biliary colic. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;9(9):CD006390. PubMed PMID: 27610712
  4. Ahmed I, Hudson J, Innes K, Hernández R, Gillies K, Bruce R, et al. Effectiveness of conservative management versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the prevention of recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease (C-GALL trial): pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2023;383:e075383. PubMed PMID: 38084426
  5. Thistle JL, Cleary PA, Lachin JM, Tyor MP, Hersh T. The natural history of cholelithiasis: the National Cooperative Gallstone Study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1984;101(2):171-5. PubMed PMID: 6742647
  6. Festi D, Reggiani ML, Attili AF, Loria P, Pazzi P, Scaioli E, et al. Natural history of gallstone disease: Expectant management or active treatment? Results from a population-based cohort study. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2010;25(4):719-24. PubMed PMID: 20492328
  7. Shabanzadeh DM. Incidence of gallstone disease and complications. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2018;34(2):81-89. PubMed PMID: 29256915
  8. Vetrhus M, Søreide O, Solhaug JH, Nesvik I, Søndenaa K. Symptomatic, non-complicated gallbladder stone disease. Operation or observation? A randomized clinical study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002;37(7):834-9. PubMed PMID: 12190099
  9. Schmidt M, Søndenaa K, Vetrhus M, Berhane T, Eide GE. A randomized controlled study of uncomplicated gallstone disease with a 14-year follow-up showed that operation was the preferred treatment. Digestive Surgery. 2011;28(4):270-6. PubMed PMID: 21757915
  10. Vetrhus M, Søreide O, Nesvik I, Søndenaa K. Acute cholecystitis: delayed surgery or observation. A randomized clinical trial. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2003;38(9):985-90. PubMed PMID: 14531537
  11. Schmidt M, Søndenaa K, Vetrhus M, Berhane T, Eide GE. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of observation versus surgery for acute cholecystitis: non-operative management is an option in some patients. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011;46(10):1257-62. PubMed PMID: 21736531
  12. van Dijk AH, Wennmacker SZ, de Reuver PR, Latenstein CSS, Buyne O, Donkervoort SC, et al. Restrictive strategy versus usual care for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain (SECURE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10188):2322-2330. PubMed PMID: 31036336
  13. Comes DJ, Wennmacker SZ, Latenstein CSS, van der Bilt J, Buyne O, Donkervoort SC, et al. Restrictive Strategy vs Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Abdominal Pain and Gallstones: 5-Year Follow-Up of the SECURE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surgery. 2024;159(11):1235-1243. PubMed PMID: 39167382
  14. Brazzelli M, Cruickshank M, Kilonzo M, Ahmed I, Stewart F, McNamee P, et al. Systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of cholecystectomy versus observation/conservative management for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis. Surgical Endoscopy. 2015;29(3):637-47. PubMed PMID: 25119541
  15. Bagepally BS, Haridoss M, Sasidharan A, Jagadeesh KV, Oswal NK. Systematic review and meta-analysis of gallstone disease treatment outcomes in early cholecystectomy versus conservative management/delayed cholecystectomy. BMJ Open Gastroenterology. 2021;8(1):e000675. PubMed PMID: 34261757
  16. Ghose K, Waheed A, Khan S, Losier D, Heshma AVC, Bhatia A, et al. Conservative Management Versus Early Cholecystectomy for Gallstone Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JGH Open. 2025;9(8):e70253. PubMed PMID: 40809895
  17. Gad MM, Ayad Q, Elgamal MM, Moubarak ES, Ziada AF, Beddor A, et al. Cholecystectomy versus conservative management for patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones and cholecystitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surgery. 2026;26(1):381. PubMed PMID: 42265664
  18. Thunnissen FM, Baars C, Arts R, Latenstein CSS, Drenth JPH, van Laarhoven CJHM, et al. Persistent and new-onset symptoms after cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: A post hoc analysis of 2 prospective clinical trials. Surgery. 2023;174(4):781-786. PubMed PMID: 37541808
  19. Lee H, Askar A, Makanji D, Ranjha K, Karki BB, Courcol J, et al. The incidence of post cholecystectomy pain (PCP) syndrome at 12 months following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective evaluation in 200 patients. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 2024;24(1). PubMed PMID: 37770380
  20. Vetrhus M, Berhane T, Søreide O, Søndenaa K. Pain persists in many patients five years after removal of the gallbladder: observations from two randomized controlled trials of symptomatic, noncomplicated gallstone disease and acute cholecystitis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2005;9(6):826-31. PubMed PMID: 15985239
  21. Lamberts MP, Lugtenberg M, Rovers MM, Roukema AJ, Drenth JP, Westert GP, et al. Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness. Surgical Endoscopy. 2013;27(3):709-18. PubMed PMID: 23052498
  22. Shabanzadeh DM. The Symptomatic Outcomes of Cholecystectomy for Gallstones. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(5):1897. PubMed PMID: 36902684
  23. Nam C, Lee JS, Kim JS, Lee TY, Yoon YC. Clinical perspectives on post-cholecystectomy syndrome: a narrative review. Annals of Medicine. 2025;57(1):2496408. PubMed PMID: 40304725
  24. Wennmacker S, Lamberts M, Gerritsen J, Roukema JA, Westert G, Drenth J, et al. Consistency of patient-reported outcomes after cholecystectomy and their implications on current surgical practice: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017;31(1):215-224. PubMed PMID: 27194258
  25. Schmidt M, Søndenaa K, Dumot JA, Rosenblatt S, Hausken T, Ramnefjell M, et al. Post-cholecystectomy symptoms were caused by persistence of a functional gastrointestinal disorder. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;18(12):1365-72. PubMed PMID: 22493550
  26. Thistle JL, Longstreth GF, Romero Y, Arora AS, Simonson JA, Diehl NN, et al. Factors that predict relief from upper abdominal pain after cholecystectomy. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2011;9(10):891-6. PubMed PMID: 21699805
  27. Latenstein CSS, Hannink G, van der Bilt JDW, Donkervoort SC, Eijsbouts QAJ, Heisterkamp J, et al. A Clinical Decision Tool for Selection of Patients With Symptomatic Cholelithiasis for Cholecystectomy Based on Reduction of Pain and a Pain-Free State Following Surgery. JAMA Surgery. 2021;156(10):e213706. PubMed PMID: 34379080
  28. Comes DJ, Latenstein CSS, van der Bilt JDW, Donkervoort SC, Heisterkamp J, Nieuwenhuijs VB, et al. Development and validation of a clinical decision tool for predicting long-term pain reduction following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: a prospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery. 2025;111(8):5205-5214. PubMed PMID: 40440684
  29. Waage A, Nilsson M. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Archives of Surgery. 2006;141(12):1207-13. PubMed PMID: 17178963
  30. Sandblom G, Videhult P, Crona Guterstam Y, Svenner A, Sadr-Azodi O. Mortality after a cholecystectomy: a population-based study. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(3):239-43. PubMed PMID: 25363135
  31. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;2013(6):CD007196. PubMed PMID: 23813478
  32. Parmar AD, Sheffield KM, Adhikari D, Davee RA, Vargas GM, Tamirisa NP, et al. PREOP-Gallstones: A Prognostic Nomogram for the Management of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis in Older Patients. Annals of Surgery. 2015;261(6):1184-90. PubMed PMID: 25072449
  33. Helenius L, Linder F, Osterman E. Relapse in gallstone disease after non-operative management of acute cholecystitis: a population-based study. BMJ Open Gastroenterology. 2025;12(1):e001680. PubMed PMID: 40101979
  34. Hernández RA, Ahmed I, Edwards K, Hudson J, Gillies K, Bruce R, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: economic evaluation based on the C-GALL trial. British Journal of Surgery. 2024;112(1):znae293. PubMed PMID: 39831722
  35. Latenstein CSS, Wennmacker SZ, van Dijk AH, Drenth JPH, Westert GP, van Laarhoven CJHM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Abdominal Pain (SECURE-trial). Annals of Surgery. 2022;276(2):e93-e101. PubMed PMID: 33065642
  36. Haridoss M, Kumar S, Natarajan M, Sasidharan A, Rajsekar K, Oswal NK, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared to conservative management in people presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis in India. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2023;23(2):215-224. PubMed PMID: 36527392
  37. Shabanzadeh DM, Christensen DW, Ewertsen C, Friis-Andersen H, Helgstrand F, Nannestad Jørgensen L, et al. National clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease: 2021 recommendations from the Danish Surgical Society. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2022;111(3):11-30. PubMed PMID: 36000716
  38. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K. Cholecystectomy versus no cholecystectomy in patients with silent gallstones. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;2007(1):CD006230. PubMed PMID: 17253585
  39. Morris-Stiff G, Sarvepalli S, Hu B, Gupta N, Lal P, Burke CA, et al. The Natural History of Asymptomatic Gallstones: A Longitudinal Study and Prediction Model. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2023;21(2):319-327.e4. PubMed PMID: 35513234
  40. Alzoubi M, Omar Saleh A, Omari FA, Shatnawi K, Hyari B, Qashou A, et al. Asymptomatic gallstones: Cumulative incidence proportion, incidence rate, and risk factors for symptoms development: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2026;21(3):e0345462. PubMed PMID: 41886405
  41. Schmidt M, Hausken T, Glambek I, Schleer C, Eide GE, Søndenaa K. A 24-year controlled follow-up of patients with silent gallstones showed no long-term risk of symptoms or adverse events leading to cholecystectomy. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011;46(7-8):949-54. PubMed PMID: 21501110
  42. Ransohoff DF, Gracie WA, Wolfenson LB, Neuhauser D. Prophylactic cholecystectomy or expectant management for silent gallstones. A decision analysis to assess survival. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1983;99(2):199-204. PubMed PMID: 6881778
  43. Alves JR, Klock DM, Ronzani FG, Santos SLD, Amico EC. ASYMPTOMATIC CHOLELITHIASIS: EXPECTANT OR CHOLECYSTECTOMY. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva. 2023;36:e1747. PubMed PMID: 37466567
  44. Ryu S, Chang Y, Yun KE, Jung HS, Shin JH, Shin H. Gallstones and the Risk of Gallbladder Cancer Mortality: A Cohort Study. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2016;111(10):1476-1487. PubMed PMID: 27575712

PubMed Topic Searches

  1. PubMed: gallstones, cholecystectomy versus conservative management
  2. PubMed: pain and symptoms after cholecystectomy
  3. PubMed: natural history of silent gallstones
  4. PubMed: pain relief in biliary colic

Connections