Erythema Migrans — The Lyme Rash Guide

Erythema Migrans — The Lyme Rash Guide — scientific infographic poster

Table of Contents

  1. What EM Is — and Why It Matters Most
  2. Classic Bullseye vs. Other Forms
  3. Timing — When It Appears and How Fast It Grows
  4. What It Feels Like
  5. Where It Appears — the "Missed Rash" Problem
  6. Photographing and Measuring the Rash
  7. Common Look-Alikes
  8. Multiple EM Lesions — Early Disseminated Disease
  9. Why the Guideline Treats the Rash as the Diagnosis
  10. When the Guideline Calls for Clinical Diagnosis Without Testing
  11. What Happens If EM Is Missed
  12. Common Questions at a Clinic Visit — What the Evidence Says
  13. After Antibiotics Begin
  14. Key Research Papers
  15. Connections
  16. Featured Videos

What EM Is — and Why It Matters Most

Erythema migrans (EM) is the expanding skin rash that appears at the site of a tick bite that transmitted Borrelia burgdorferi. It is the most common manifestation of early Lyme disease. The CDC states that EM occurs in approximately 70–80% of infected people, beginning 3 to 30 days after the bite. The 2020 IDSA/AAN/ACR guideline recommends that a person with potential tick exposure in a Lyme-endemic area who has one or more skin lesions compatible with EM be diagnosed clinically rather than by laboratory testing.

Because the rash is on the skin, it is often the first sign of infection that people notice themselves. The guideline’s listed regimens for EM are short oral courses — 10 days of doxycycline, or 14 days of amoxicillin or cefuroxime axetil — and in a randomized trial of 180 patients with EM, 10 days of doxycycline worked as well as 20 days. Untreated, the infection can spread and later cause Lyme arthritis, carditis, facial palsy, or neuroborreliosis.

The rash is caused by the bacteria migrating outward through the skin from the bite site. As spirochetes spread radially through the dermis, the immune system follows, creating an expanding ring of inflammation. That is literally what erythema migrans means: "migrating redness."

Classic Bullseye vs. Other Forms

Everybody has seen the stock photo — a round red ring with a pale center and a dark dot in the middle. That classic bullseye is the familiar image, but in the United States it is not the most common form, and EM is not pathognomonic: other rashes can look similar.

A 2007 JAMA analysis of 53 studies (8,493 patients) found central clearing in only 19% of EM lesions in Lyme-endemic areas of the United States (95% CI 11–32%), against 79% in Europe and 80% in non-endemic U.S. areas. In a U.S. vaccine-trial cohort of 118 patients whose EM was confirmed by culture or PCR, early lesions commonly showed homogeneous or central redness rather than a red ring with partial central clearing. Forms described in these studies and in the CDC’s image gallery include:

EM on darker skin. A 2026 analysis of the dermatology resources used at 50 top U.S. medical schools notes that cutaneous Lyme disease presents differently on light and dark skin, and found that only 3 of 47 EM images (6.4%) in 16 resources showed dark skin. Black patients are less often diagnosed at the rash stage: in a multicenter pediatric study, Black children with Lyme disease were less likely to have an EM diagnosed (adjusted odds ratio 0.34) and more likely to have a swollen joint (3.68); in a Maryland specialty clinic, the median time to appropriate antibiotic treatment for Black patients with EM was 26 days, against 4 days for White patients, and two of the Black patients whose rashes the study illustrates had first been diagnosed with an allergic reaction and with cellulitis. A 2000 Maryland surveillance study suggested that failure to recognize early EM in African Americans may explain their higher rates of late manifestations.

Size and growth carry more weight than shape. The CDC’s surveillance case definition describes EM as a lesion that begins as a red macule or papule and expands over days to weeks to form a large round lesion, often with partial central clearing, and requires a single primary lesion of at least 5 cm (2 inches) across; the CDC notes that this definition is for surveillance and is not intended for making a clinical diagnosis. The 2007 JAMA analysis concluded that no single element of the history or examination is highly sensitive on its own.

Timing — When It Appears and How Fast It Grows

The CDC states that EM begins at the site of the bite 3 to 30 days after the tick bite, with an average of about 7 days. A small bump or redness that appears immediately at a tick bite and resembles a mosquito bite is common; the CDC notes that this irritation generally goes away in 1–2 days and is not a sign of Lyme disease. EM takes days to develop.

The CDC describes EM as expanding gradually over several days and reaching up to 12 inches (30 cm) or more across. In a Slovenian study of patients with a single EM, lesion diameter grew by a median of about 1.2–1.5 cm per day, and a review notes that EM in Europe expands more slowly than in the United States. That continued outward growth is one of the most useful diagnostic features. In two New York studies, lesions measured an average of about 16 cm across when evaluated (range 6–73 cm in one of them), so lesions of 15 cm or more are common by the time they are seen.

A plot of rash diameter against days since a tick bite: the redness that appears at a bite within hours stays below the 5 cm line and generally goes away in 1 to 2 days, while erythema migrans appears 3 to 30 days after the bite, on average about 7 days, and grows roughly 1 to 2 cm a day past the 5 cm line, often reaching 15 cm or more by the time it is seen. EM GROWS · A BITE REACTION FADES rash diameter against days since the tick bite often 15 cm or more when seen 5 cm (2 inches) and growing 2 cm a day 1 cm a day erythema migrans bite reaction gone in 1–2 days 5 cm 15 cm rash diameter → bite 3 7 30 days since the tick bite → EM appears 3–30 days after, average about 7 SIZE AND GROWTH, NOT SHAPE a rash within hours is not EM CDC: redness at a bite right away is common and is not a sign of Lyme disease that bite reaction fades CDC: the irritation generally goes away within 1–2 days EM keeps getting bigger roughly 1–2 cm a day in one European study — that outward march is the diagnostic clue CDC case definition: a primary lesion of 5 cm or more that expands over days to weeks (for surveillance) curve shapes are illustrative · EM growth drawn from the average onset day · the times, sizes and rates are the page’s

Many people never saw the tick. The CDC notes that nymphal ticks, which pose a particularly high risk because of their abundance and small size, are approximately the size of a poppy seed; that a tick generally must be attached for more than 24 hours before the Lyme bacterium can be transmitted; and that patients are often unaware of a tick bite before getting sick. In a New York study only 19.8% of patients with EM-like lesions recalled a tick bite, and in a culture-confirmed series 25% had noticed a bite at the site of the rash. Not remembering a bite does not rule out Lyme.

What It Feels Like

EM is usually painless. The CDC describes it as possibly warm to the touch but rarely itchy or painful. Lesions on the back or other hard-to-see places can go unnoticed by the person who has them.

That largely painless quality helps distinguish EM from several look-alikes:

The 2007 JAMA analysis concluded that recognizing EM means combining several features of the examination with the epidemiological context — such as hiking, gardening, or time in grass in a Lyme-endemic area a week or so earlier — rather than relying on any single sign.

Many patients also have a mild flu-like illness. In a series of 79 U.S. patients with culture-confirmed EM, 68% had systemic symptoms — fatigue (54%), joint pain (44%), muscle aches (44%), headache (42%), fever or chills (39%) — and 23% had localized swollen lymph nodes. The 2007 JAMA analysis found fever and headache frequently reported and nausea and vomiting rare, and the U.S. vaccine-trial cohort described the typical presentation as EM with nonspecific flu-like symptoms.

Where It Appears — the "Missed Rash" Problem

Ticks often attach in warm, tucked-away skin, so EM can appear in places that are hard to see on one’s own body. The CDC notes that it may appear on any area of the body; locations often described include:

This is the "missed rash" problem. A review of Lyme borreliosis reports that EM is the presenting manifestation in about 80% of U.S. patients; about 18% have nonspecific summer symptoms without a recognized EM, and the remaining 2–3% first present with a later manifestation such as facial palsy or Lyme arthritis. Lesions on the scalp, back, buttocks, and the backs of the knees can go unnoticed unless someone else looks.

Photographing and Measuring the Rash

Because growth over time is central to recognizing EM, a dated photographic record shows a clinician change that a single look cannot. Features that make such photographs useful:

  1. Daily photographs. The same spot, once per day, documents expansion over time.
  2. A scale reference. A ruler, a coin (a U.S. quarter is about 24 mm across, a dime about 18 mm), or a standard payment card (about 85 mm long) next to the rash. Without scale, size cannot be judged from a photo.
  3. A pen line at the border. An outer edge traced on one day shows on the next whether the rash has grown past it — documented expansion.
  4. Even natural light. Daylight near a window shows color more truly than a phone flash, which can distort red tones.
  5. A wide shot and a close-up. Wide for body location; close-up for texture and border detail.
  6. A photograph of any tick found, on a white background with a coin for scale, from which its species can be identified later.

A series showing measurable outward expansion documents the feature the CDC’s case definition centers on: a lesion that expands over days to weeks.

Common Look-Alikes

Misdiagnosis runs in both directions. In a case series from a Connecticut referral center, EM was missed in 5 patients because of atypical presentations, and 8 patients with EM-like eruptions were wrongly diagnosed with EM; at a university Lyme disease clinic, 38% of 146 referred children had been overdiagnosed with Lyme disease and 8% underdiagnosed. Conditions commonly confused with EM:

Multiple EM Lesions — Early Disseminated Disease

Several EM patches scattered across the body — one on the back, one on the thigh, one on the arm — are a sign of early disseminated Lyme disease. The first (primary) lesion forms at the bite. Within days to weeks, U.S. strains of B. burgdorferi commonly spread from the bite site to other skin sites, each of which develops its own EM lesion.

How often this happens depends on the study: in pooled U.S. studies 81% of patients had a single lesion, so roughly one in five had several; a culture-confirmed New York series found multiple lesions in 18%, a prospective New York study in 26.7%, and an early 1983 series of 314 patients in almost half. The 2020 guideline applies the same EM treatment durations to solitary and multiple EM (see Antibiotic Treatment Protocols). Neurologic involvement, facial palsy, heart-rhythm changes, and arthritis are later manifestations that, a review reports, treatment of EM prevents.

Why the Guideline Treats the Rash as the Diagnosis

The 2020 IDSA/AAN/ACR Lyme guidelines (Lantos et al.) state: in patients with potential tick exposure in a Lyme disease endemic area who have one or more skin lesions compatible with erythema migrans, the panel recommends clinical diagnosis rather than laboratory testing.

Two reasons are usually given. First, in that setting a compatible expanding lesion is the most common and most recognizable feature of early Lyme disease. Second, blood tests at this stage are insensitive, because antibodies take weeks to develop. The guideline notes that as few as 20% of untreated patients with a microbiologically confirmed single EM are seropositive by conventional two-tier testing (an ELISA followed by a Western blot) on a sample taken within a week, and that results are often falsely negative in EM patients tested less than 2 weeks after the rash appears. In a prospective study, only about one-third of 76 EM patients had positive results at the first visit, and almost two-thirds 3–4 weeks later. A negative result during the rash stage does not rule out Lyme disease.

Testing, and when it becomes informative, is covered in Lyme Testing Explained.

When the Guideline Calls for Clinical Diagnosis Without Testing

The guideline’s clinical-diagnosis recommendation, read together with the CDC’s description of the rash, covers a person with all of the following:

For lesions that are suggestive of, but atypical for, EM, the guideline instead suggests antibody testing on an acute-phase blood sample, followed by a convalescent-phase sample if the first result is negative.

For EM, the guideline recommends oral doxycycline for 10 days (adults: 100 mg twice daily or 200 mg once daily), or amoxicillin or cefuroxime axetil for 14 days, rather than longer courses; for patients unable to take both doxycycline and beta-lactam antibiotics, the preferred second-line drug is azithromycin (7 days in the United States, range 5–10). Children receive weight-based doses, and the guideline notes a growing consensus that doxycycline is safe in young children for courses of at least up to 14 days. Doxycycline has traditionally been avoided in pregnancy, and the guideline describes uncertainty about its safety there. See Antibiotic Treatment Protocols for the full dosing table.

Serology becomes far more sensitive later, weeks or months after the rash. In the same prospective study, all 44 patients with neurologic, heart, or joint involvement had positive results on one of the two test systems, and 42 had IgG responses on two-tier testing. At the EM stage, by contrast, a negative test is common in true infection.

What Happens If EM Is Missed

Even without antibiotics, EM typically improves or resolves within weeks. Fading does not mean the infection has cleared: in a study carried out before the cause of Lyme disease was known, about 60% of untreated EM patients in the northeastern United States went on to develop arthritis, an average of 6 months later (range 4 days to 2 years). Without treatment, the infection can progress through these stages:

A review reports that antibiotic treatment of EM shortens its course and prevents these later manifestations, and the U.S. vaccine-trial cohort found the clinical outcome excellent when antibiotics were given soon after symptoms began.

Common Questions at a Clinic Visit — What the Evidence Says

Questions that commonly come up when a possible EM is seen in a clinic, and what the guideline and studies say about each:

Is a blood test needed before treatment? The 2020 guideline recommends clinical diagnosis rather than laboratory testing for patients with potential tick exposure in an endemic area and one or more lesions compatible with EM. Two-tier serology is negative in most patients during the first week — the guideline notes that as few as 20% are seropositive on a sample taken within a week.

Could it be a spider bite? EM is rarely painful and keeps expanding over days; recluse bites usually progress to a necrotic ulcer, and most lesions that emergency-department patients attribute to spider bites are diagnosed as skin infections. Dated photographs with a scale show whether a lesion is growing.

What if the exposure was outside the local area? EM begins 3 to 30 days after the bite (CDC), so it can appear after a person has returned from an endemic area; the guideline’s clinical-diagnosis recommendation is framed around potential tick exposure in an endemic area, wherever that exposure took place.

What does a negative test in the first week mean? The guideline notes that results are often falsely negative in EM patients tested less than 2 weeks after the rash appears; in a prospective study, about one-third of EM patients were positive at the first visit and almost two-thirds 3–4 weeks later.

Decisions about a specific rash and its treatment belong with a clinician.

After Antibiotics Begin

The rash fades gradually rather than overnight. In a 1983 trial of 108 adults with early Lyme disease, EM and its associated symptoms resolved in a mean of 5.4 and 5.7 days with penicillin or tetracycline, against 9.2 days with erythromycin.

The guideline’s durations are for full courses — 10 days of doxycycline, or 14 days of amoxicillin or cefuroxime axetil — and the rash often clears before a course ends. New symptoms during or after treatment, such as facial droop, knee swelling, heart palpitations, or severe headache, are among the disseminated manifestations described above, and the rash resolving does not by itself mean the infection has resolved. For those manifestations the guideline lists other regimens: for meningitis, cranial neuropathy, or radiculoneuropathy, IV ceftriaxone, cefotaxime or penicillin G, or oral doxycycline; for patients hospitalized with Lyme carditis, it suggests starting with IV ceftriaxone rather than oral antibiotics until there is clinical improvement; and for arthritis with little or no response to a first oral course, a 2- to 4-week course of IV ceftriaxone rather than a second oral course.

Doxycycline labeling describes several practical points: drinking fluids liberally with the dose reduces the risk of esophageal irritation and ulceration; an exaggerated sunburn reaction (photosensitivity) can occur with sun or ultraviolet exposure; and absorption is reduced by antacids containing aluminum, calcium, or magnesium, by iron-containing preparations, and by bismuth subsalicylate. The same labeling states that doxycycline absorption is not markedly influenced by food or milk. Cat's Claw extract was one of seven botanicals active against non-growing B. burgdorferi in a laboratory (test-tube) study, although its minimum inhibitory concentration against growing bacteria was high; evidence in people with Lyme disease is lacking, and the guideline’s treatments for EM are antibiotics.

Key Research Papers

  1. Lantos PM, Rumbaugh J, Bockenstedt LK, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the IDSA, AAN, and ACR: 2020 Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Lyme Disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(1):e1–e48. — doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1215
  2. Shapiro ED. Clinical practice: Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1724–1731. — doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1314325
  3. Feder HM Jr, Johnson BJB, O'Connell S, et al. A Critical Appraisal of "Chronic Lyme Disease." N Engl J Med. 2007;357(14):1422–1430. — doi:10.1056/NEJMra072023
  4. Smith RP, Schoen RT, Rahn DW, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcome of Early Lyme Disease in Patients with Microbiologically Confirmed Erythema Migrans. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(6):421–428. (image atlas of classic and atypical EM). — doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-6-200203190-00005
  5. Tibbles CD, Edlow JA. Does this patient have erythema migrans? JAMA. 2007;297(23):2617–2627. — PubMed PMID: 17579230
  6. Nadelman RB, Nowakowski J, Forseter G, et al. The clinical spectrum of early Lyme borreliosis in patients with culture-confirmed erythema migrans. Am J Med. 1996;100(5):502–508. — PubMed PMID: 8644761
  7. Wormser GP, Masters E, Nowakowski J, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of patients from Missouri and New York with erythema migrans-like skin lesions. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(7):958–965. — PubMed PMID: 16142659
  8. Steere AC, McHugh G, Damle N, Sikand VK. Prospective study of serologic tests for Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(2):188–195. — PubMed PMID: 18532885
  9. Wormser GP, Ramanathan R, Nowakowski J, et al. Duration of antibiotic therapy for early Lyme disease. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(9):697–704. — PubMed PMID: 12729423
  10. Steere AC, Strle F, Wormser GP, et al. Lyme borreliosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16090. — PubMed PMID: 27976670
  11. Maraspin V, Ogrinc K, Rojko T, et al. Characteristics of spirochetemic patients with a solitary erythema migrans skin lesion in Europe. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250198. (EM spreading rate from the full text.) — PubMed PMID: 33886635
  12. Hunt KM, Michelson KA, Balamuth F, et al. Racial differences in the diagnosis of Lyme disease in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(6):1129–1131. — PubMed PMID: 36314085
  13. Starke SJ, Rebman AW, Miller J, et al. Time to diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease by patient race. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2347184. — PubMed PMID: 38085545
  14. Baffoe-Mensah N, Lipoff JB, Forke CM. Skin tone representation of early Lyme disease in medical education resources: gaps and implications for equity. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2026;13:23821205251407778. — PubMed PMID: 41551939
  15. Fix AD, Peña CA, Strickland GT. Racial differences in reported Lyme disease incidence. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(8):756–759. — PubMed PMID: 11052554
  16. Feder HM Jr, Whitaker DL. Misdiagnosis of erythema migrans. Am J Med. 1995;99(4):412–419. — PubMed PMID: 7573098
  17. Feder HM Jr, Hunt MS. Pitfalls in the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease in children. JAMA. 1995;274(1):66–68. — PubMed PMID: 7791260
  18. Suchard JR. "Spider bite" lesions are usually diagnosed as skin and soft-tissue infections. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(5):473–481. — PubMed PMID: 19939602
  19. Diaz JH, Leblanc KE. Common spider bites. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(6):869–873. — PubMed PMID: 17390599
  20. Steere AC, Hutchinson GJ, Rahn DW, et al. Treatment of the early manifestations of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(1):22–26. — PubMed PMID: 6407378
  21. Steere AC, Bartenhagen NH, Craft JE, et al. The early clinical manifestations of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(1):76–82. — PubMed PMID: 6859726
  22. Feng J, Leone J, Schweig S, Zhang Y. Evaluation of natural and botanical medicines for activity against growing and non-growing forms of B. burgdorferi. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:6. (Laboratory study.) — PubMed PMID: 32154254
  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Signs and Symptoms of Untreated Lyme Disease. — cdc.gov/lyme/signs-symptoms
  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How Lyme Disease Spreads. — cdc.gov/lyme/causes
  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About Southern Tick-Associated Rash Illness. — cdc.gov/stari/about
  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Lyme Disease (Borrelia burgdorferi) 2022 Case Definition. — ndc.services.cdc.gov/case-definitions/lyme-disease-2022
  27. Doxycycline hyclate prescribing information (Precautions: Information for Patients; Drug Interactions). DailyMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine. — dailymed.nlm.nih.gov

PubMed Topic Searches

For deeper reading, the following PubMed topic searches return current peer-reviewed work on EM recognition, differential diagnosis, and early Lyme management:

  1. PubMed: Erythema migrans and Lyme disease diagnosis
  2. PubMed: Atypical erythema migrans presentations
  3. PubMed: STARI vs. erythema migrans
  4. PubMed: Erythema migrans on skin of color
  5. PubMed: Multiple erythema migrans and early disseminated Lyme
  6. PubMed: Doxycycline duration in early Lyme disease
  7. PubMed: Serology sensitivity in early Lyme infection
  8. PubMed: Jarisch–Herxheimer reaction in Lyme treatment

Back to Table of Contents

Connections

Back to Table of Contents